Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

sampleSizeOfOne

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    19,608

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by sampleSizeOfOne

  1. sampleSizeOfOne
    I have no idea how it's implemented, but things are usually more efficient if there is an order, and this sounds like the result of choosing an order as a default behavior at a low level of implementation when one has no idea how it will get used. I expect somewhere there is a way to specify the order when people care. So if you are bored and want to look under the hood at the programatic process, i'm sure there's a point where you could trivially tell it to sort differently just before displaying it, and it will? (been almost 2 decades since i collected a vaguely programming related pay check, so i got no specific, direct or current wisdom to impart... and nominally i was by edumacation on the theoretical side, so what do i know. Anyone know yet for sure if P=NP or not? Or can i continue my rip van winkle life style?) Now i'm curious how it handled the roster changes over the past few weeks. Was it able to include the recent work of pitchers now available but who pitched recently for other teams? Or pitchers who'd pitched recently for us but now on other teams? But i'm too lazy to do more than ponder in a long winded post... Sorry. But i digress... Happy Culpepper day!
  2. sampleSizeOfOne
    Do look at perspicuity.com when you get a chance. There might be one or two others worth referencing there as well. Sometimes i wish he were more prolific, but i imagine that could involve lowering the standards or quality of the work, which is a hard thing to consider.
  3. sampleSizeOfOne
    I also approve this here "most making"
  4. sampleSizeOfOne
    Works for me. (sorry for paying attention to details that don't actually matter.)
  5. sampleSizeOfOne
    (perspicuity.com, if you are unfamiliar with the works of Craig Swanson... i was once involved with a show where they got him to design the poster is how i heard of him)
  6. sampleSizeOfOne
    Is that why we're chasing them?
  7. sampleSizeOfOne
    Reverse alphabetical order based on first name?
  8. sampleSizeOfOne
    How'd you know?!
  9. sampleSizeOfOne
    12-11 red walk white off in the battle of the socks. For a red sweep, i guess...
  10. sampleSizeOfOne
    11-11 going to 13th.
  11. sampleSizeOfOne
    That's right! I remember i figured out what these numbers mean last weekish? (and was embarrassed it took me so long) Likewise i finally parsed the username! (again, i shoulda gotten it at first glance)
  12. sampleSizeOfOne
    10-10 top of the 12th....
  13. sampleSizeOfOne
    Thanks! Alas i'm not espnified. (for some reason "kinda funny lookin'" came to mind)
  14. sampleSizeOfOne
    It's not over until we decide it's Ober!
  15. sampleSizeOfOne
    Please elaborate... If you don't mind...
  16. sampleSizeOfOne
    Me too.
  17. sampleSizeOfOne
    Pretty sure one can both hug and hit. The latter has to happen in the batter's box to count.
  18. sampleSizeOfOne
    Cue for a Kit Kat Commercial?
  19. sampleSizeOfOne
    Reeeeeeeeaaaaaaaallllyyy? What if just disappears like Shoeless Joe?
  20. sampleSizeOfOne
    So... you're saying regression might be our friend?
  21. sampleSizeOfOne
    Clarification is appreciated. Sorry for asking a compound question. I suppose i'd also be content with his triumphant absence, The last couple games haven't fit that general description. I am too lazy to pay attention, so it follows i won't do the leg work to establish a statistical correlation between Buxton's playing and triumph. But i hope that is the case on a sufficiently large sample size. But for today (and consistent with my username) i hope we win.
  22. sampleSizeOfOne
    Confused (am i) What aren't the same thing? And i'm not seening an answer to my question. Though i perhaps should mention i'll give partial credit for Buxton's next non-triumphant return. I do admit to being less interested in that.
  23. sampleSizeOfOne
    Ober's got this! I haven't been paying attention... How long until Buxton's triumphant return?
  24. sampleSizeOfOne
    Wait... How'd you know?! We didn't tell anyone about that.... You weren't the one she told it to, we you?
  25. sampleSizeOfOne
    The last line of your most eloquent Twins Daily haiku is too long.
×
×
  • Create New...