I am pretty flabbergasted reading these posts. Look, supposedly the rebuilding 2013 could at least have been about figuring out who other than Mauer is a legitimate player for the future Twins when Sano, Buxton, and Rosario (as a second baseman, in particular) are ready to play. You can say that Dozier clearly passed the test and that Arcia is a very likely candidate to pass that test given a season beyond his semi-rookie year. Florimon has passed the defensive test and currently has value there. Now, what's left out of 2013? Hicks was an abomination in April. That word abomination ONLY applies to his performance in April. In my view, there is no way the Twins shouldn't start him on opening day in CF. He can't bat seventh against righties. Plouffe and Parmelee! I'll be a monkey's uncle. What a damn platoon opportunity for two players who actually were on the roster together most of this year and who could share RF together. This need not be a straight platoon, but it still can work very effectively in maximizing PAs for players in positions where they are most able to contribute. And thus I don't understand how it is crazy to consider have a roster for 2014 that maximizes the abilities of the . . . . . roster for 2014. If Parmelee is traded somehow, OK, but that is doubtful. In any event when you have such a platoon you are then able, in game, to bring in the other guy to pinch hit! Am I explaining the obvious? Yes. Is this necessary to explain the obvious? Apparently so.