In honesty, I'm not that bothered by the notion of Kirilloff starting with a few weeks in St. Paul. I mean, I'm annoyed by the notion employers taking advantage of employees, but I think there's legitimate baseball reasons to do it. This is written without knowing the rest of the roster, and it assumes health on the part of everyone, but: It is true that he hasn't had any AAA at bats. If he's going to stumble a bit in going up a level, I'd rather it be on the east side of the river. It gives a couple weeks to explore whether Arraez can play a passable left field. Or Cave, if he's shown anything in camp. It gives opportunity to pick an opportunity for success for Kirilloff. Rather than opening day against opening day pitchers, and if buys the time they want, they could use the mid-April trip to Los Angeles and Oakland, for example. That's about as low-profile as one could get.Not saying I'd go that route. Just saying that it's defensible. It also does fit the pattern of this FO not tending to assume that a rookie will be a rookie at season start. It's for that reason that I think we'll still at least one, and perhaps two additional starting bats signed, with the idea that opportunities will arise for Kirilloff, Rooker, Larnach, Lewis, etc., when there are injuries and they've demonstrated that they are on top of their game in AAA.