Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,375
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Some pretty big assumptions in there....Polanco and Vargas among them. You left off Santana, Nolasco, and all the RP...... edit: I see you re-did the math.....from 24 to 27..... 27 is young in your mind? Just to be clear, you think having an average age of 27 is young for a baseball team?
  2. Tulo would be here next year, and after......for most of us, trading for him was for next year also, I think we've been fairly clear on that. Indeed, if you aren't going to try to win, why acquire Jepsen? Why not trade off Pelfrey, Duensing, Fien, Boyer (or just cut them)?
  3. Still waiting for an answer the very good question posted earlier....... "What results would have shown the deadline (non)-Moves to be the wrong decision."
  4. That nerve thing is interesting. IMO, that's why guys should be brought up earlier, rather than later. Get the nerves out of the way BEFORE you are counting on them to be a key piece (like, while rebuilding and not contending).......or, put them in the bullpen first, then move them to start. Or, call them up to only play 2 games a week, and ease in. I don't think we have any idea if the pressure did in Vargas and Arcia. Most national people I read said Vargas isn't a MLB player talent wise, and Arcia has a 100 ops+......I think there are other issues with those two.
  5. I thought I read over and over they tried to change Burdi, to give him more control. I have no idea it is true or false, I just took it at face value. If not, then they clearly were wrong to draft a RP that high.....if so, they were wrong to make changes. Either way, I'm still waiting for one of these "close to the majors" RP they've drafted to even be good in AAA as a RP.....or is that AA?
  6. Proving what about their approach at the deadline? We can agree that they won't make the playoffs probably, while still disagreeing they did the right things at the deadline, can't we?
  7. You can't trade guys that bust.....if you wait to see who has value, you can't trade the other guys.
  8. I really think Turner needs half a year to adjust......let's hope that trend continues. IMO, they should not have tried to change what worked with Burdi......indeed, the "progress" from all the RP makes me question their entire approach to coaching RP in the minors.
  9. Again, you don't have to fix every hole to fix one hole......Tulo went for pennies on the dollar, that's a national consensus. He isn't a 1 year rental. Again, it's a straw man to suggest that anyone here suggested they try to fix EVERY hole. No one here is arguing that. The OP is arguing that not really doing anything, other than giving up assets for 1 player we ALL agree won't move the needle was a good idea.....
  10. ya, don't agree at all. Standing in place, and not calling up Duffey to the bullpen, or Berrios is not good thinking, imo. Trading for a mediocre RP? Not a good decision, if that is all you do. Keeping Duensing and Boyer on the roster is a good decision? Keeping 13 pitchers, and not having Arcia up is a good decision? we won't agree on this. Straddling the fence is never a good strategy. How are they launching for next year, with one of the older rosters in baseball, exactly? May starting yesterday would have been better than Duffey......they decided not to have him ready for that.......they decided that.
  11. He is up, not still in the minors. Not hiding him at all, he is up. So, I hope they really think Duffey is better right now, not that they are afraid for an elite prospect.
  12. Let's hope note.......unless not winning next year isn't the top priority, Buxton should be up.
  13. so, you think if he does poorly in his first start, they'll move May or Berrios in? What it likely means is that Milone is still hurt, nothing more or less.
  14. I hope it isn't the latter, that they are afraid.....the Yankees are starting their 21 YO phenom, not protecting him. Other teams have called up their phenoms, and aren't protecting them. If it really is fear, well, I'm tired of what looks like fear. So, I hope it isn't that latter....
  15. Fair....I'd rather Duffey was in the pen, and May / Berrios were starting....but fair. It's not a horrible decision at all, just not the one I'd make.
  16. I'm not ignoring anything. This team is neither going all in to compete, or building for the future. They are standing in place, like they always do during the season. Here is what has happened in the time Ryan has been GM, that he's accountable for.....that matters past this year: Hughes Santana Nolasco Suzuki May Meyer In 3-4 years, he's added 2-3 players that are good when they matter, and 2-4 that are bad. What exactly should make me excited about that? You can say they aren't ignoring their weaknesses, but I can only judge based on the fact that Nunez has DH'd recently, they added a mediocre bullpen arm, and finally cut Santana after 3 months of being awful. I can only judge on actions, since I can't see the process. I don't see that as really doing much of anything, either for this year, or next year. That's my opinion, not a fact.....but I doubt I'm the only one with that opinion.
  17. And if Duffey starts 2-3 games, and not one?
  18. Oh, I didn't for a moment believe they were going to play games in the fall that mattered the last two years, I put zero credibility into his baseball comments. Like I said, I thought it was Ryan. I guess this year we can finally judge him on his comments. They are coming close to not playing meaningful games this fall.....
  19. Good luck to Mr. Duffey. It's an exciting moment for him. Frankly, I wanted him up here as a RP more than a month ago, so I'm glad he's in MN now.
  20. It's funny, but there are actually studies about this on the internet. the projections are usually good, not great, like, much better than random stuff a GM says in the paper, or posters here post...... Hope is not a strategy. Positive outlooks on bad situations is not a strategy. Plenty of research on this as well, also available for free on the internet. Businesses don't succeed by hoping and ignoring their weaknesses. They succeed by acknowledging them and eliminating them.
  21. I think the answer is: sort of. Dozier and Plouffe will hit again. Mauer and Hunter? they are old and bad. Suzuki is just bad. So, no, I don't think they'll hit again in a way that helps a team relative to their peers. That's 1/3 of your lineup you are giving away. Then there is SS, a position that is at best suspect......44% of your lineup given away......and Hicks with his splits, and Rosario with his "patience"......ya, good luck. And, it isn't hard, as pointed out above, to cut Boyer and Duensing at this point. But, we see it clearly last year and this year, this team doesn't understand, imo, that if you are rebuilding, you play the young guys sooner rather than later.
  22. Last year also, while Terry was out, he said it after the first game or so......
  23. btw, I'm not asking Terry Ryan when they should go all in.....I'm asking the people here who said not this year....when?
  24. Perhaps it was St. peter that said it in previous years.....and I found one from him for sure that said it in 2014 (St. Peter that is). I'll just concede this is the first year Terry said they should contend late in the season.
×
×
  • Create New...