Other than money......I don't get how a proven MLB is more risky than a draft pick that has never played in the majors. I am responding to this from Seth: I think any free agent signing is risky and probably won't end well, so I woudln't go out and get an established one. Isn't a draft pick risky, and super LIKELY not to end well? As for the question, do they NEED and ACE? No, but as constructed on offense and defense right now, an ACE would help this team a lot. This is not the Blue Jays offense, or the Royals defense or bullpen...... I see a zero percent chance an ace signs here as a FA this year. So either Berrios becomes one, or they trade for one, or they don't have one again for many years....