Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    46,867

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    330

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    It would really help the Twins run prevention if Buxton can hit at all next near, and stay healthy.....really help. Twins win today, 5-2. book it. like, all your money.....
  2. Mike Sixel
    I'll be shocked if he pitches less than 140 innings next year, if healthy. Shocked. the 20% increase thing is a terrible piece of bad science.....
  3. Mike Sixel
    Uh.....it was 2400 per customer, in fees alone, for those that incurred fees. That doesn't count any issues with credit scores changing, or anything else. if someone stole $2400 from you, would you want them prosecuted? should it matter, really? They committed fraud, and as I said, heads should roll up the chain more than they have.
  4. Mike Sixel
    I too would probably mostly use Rogers against lefties, and not against really good righty HR hitters....
  5. Mike Sixel
    Opening an account in someone's name is fraud. Every employee, supervisor and others should face prosecution, imo.
  6. Mike Sixel
    How much time? This is year 4 or 5, depending on what you think was the "start" of the rebuild.
  7. Mike Sixel
    Why? I mean, i agree, if healthy, he should play 3B next year......but why is it wrong/bad/evil to be a DH at 23, if it turns out he can't field?
  8. Mike Sixel
    i'm curious how you know what is going on in his mind. Hitting behind a runner for a productive out is stupid baseball, btw.
  9. Mike Sixel
    I consider a lot of it answeredish*..... Hughes? hurt most likely May? ok, that's open Gibson? Mediocre/bad Santana? Pretty good Duffey? Either not a starter, or needs to go to 2 pitches Santiago? Not here next year, probably Berrios? big question mark Meija? Won't start the year here, but will pitch in MN, probably like a number 5 Hmmmm....looking at that list, I see 3 guys that will likely start here next year. Ok, ya, that's a big question. My bad. *probably not an actual word, and "answered" is an exaggeration.....
  10. Mike Sixel
    I have always agreed with you that lower revenue teams don't do this. I have disagreed that they shouldn't ever do it, though in this post, we seem to be agreeing that IF there is a premier FA SP, they should try to sign him (even knowing the last 1-2 years will probably stink relative to the contract). I think AZ has a much bigger tv deal, so I agree, I'm not sure they are like the Twins. Clearly, rightly or wrongly, lower revenue teams agree with your general stance, that they should not go in for big time FAs (though the Cards have re-signed their own players to big deals, or tried to).
  11. Mike Sixel
    Can Phil Hughes and Glen Perkins be counted on as factors going forward? No. Anything you get from them is a bonus, but counting on either to be healthy would be foolish, imo. I guess I don't understand two things about Sano. 1. The sample size on defense is tiny. He hasn't played 3B hardly at all for 2 years. If he's healthy, why not play him there next year? 2. Why is it wrong/bad/evil to just make him a DH, if it turns out he's awful at fielding? Which relievers can be counted on? Pretty much none of them other than Pressley.....which is a real bummer. to me, the biggest questions are: Can Sano field? Can Buxton hit? Can Berrios pitch? What do you do with Polanco/Dozier? Other than that, the other stuff pales, imo.
  12. Mike Sixel
    They didn't, and the Royals lost for over 30 years......I too would rather add the FAs when the team is good, and they need to fill one hole....but, I guess, since it is an entertainment business that somewhat relies on butts in seats....at some point, they need to try to speed up the process, imo. I do agree, the Twins can't buy a team like the Yankees used to. No place have I advocated that that. Had they signed a big time FA 5 years ago, to a 6 year deal......would they be hamstrung right now? How about 4 years ago? Nope. edit: I think I was clear, best, not most expensive. And, I was clear, you'd have to be lucky to do that. No place have I ever stated they should sign the most expensive FA every year. No place.
  13. Mike Sixel
    Wow, there's a lot in this post.....I especially like the polite way it is posted... Where did I say the following: 1. FA contracts are good the whole length of the contract 2. Teams should sign players that are under performing 3. Teams should sign many mediocre players at the same position, rather than 1 good player 4. They should never trade prospects for proven players to get over the hump No place, in the history of this site, did I post those things. But, it was an excellent straw man post.
  14. Mike Sixel
    Thanks for the link, I'll have to check it out when I get home!
  15. Mike Sixel
    I don't think it is fair to say "he had a bigger payroll before, so he can't work here"....which I don't THINK anyone is saying...... We just don't know what he'd do with a smaller payroll as a constraint.
  16. Mike Sixel
    There are some awesome points in this post, and it was very polite. Thank you. I agree with pretty much all of that, really. The one part I don't agree with....is that not signing FAs is part of why bad teams are bad. They have decided (probably correctly) that they should wait 3-5 years to be good....and will build slowly thru the draft (and, for teams not named the Twins, Cubans or expensive Japanese players) and thru the international amateur lines. I have no issue with that decision at all. It is generally the correct decision. OTOH......If a bad team signs the best FA every year for three years......it is certainly possible to speed up the process, though you'd have to be very lucky/skilled, to pick the right player(s). Frankly, imo, a bad team should sign highly variable players to low/mid 1 year make good deals, and then when they work, trade them......but I am sympathetic to those that believe you can speed up the process by signing legit FAs. I am more sympathetic to your stance, though.
  17. Mike Sixel
    I don't think anyone is arguing that signing 1 player is going to fix the world.....I think some are arguing that NOT signing expensive FAs is cutting off one way to acquire players. For me, if the team is bad, and they have lots of money, I don't see the general harm in signing a FA. He probably won't turn the team around, but unless he is blocking a young player......it probably isn't an issue for most teams to sign high priced players. Now, it can later create salary constraints, but that's about planning and resource allocation and being willing to trade players and lots of stuff.....Nothing about having Mauer on this roster prevents them from spending more money. It is how the money is spent that matters. I don't expect everyone to agree with this, btw. But, it is where I sit.
  18. Mike Sixel
    It would definitely be a change. I just don't know enough about how a GM decides what to do to know what to say about most of the candidates. Also, all the moves have to be looked at in context. What I like about what AA did at the end was that he saw NYY and BOS were not their normal powerhouses, and he struck when he had the chance. The Jays were the best AL team last year, they just happened to lose in the tourney. They look like about the 2nd or 3rd best team this year in the AL. It's hard to argue with the outcomes at the end of his tenure.
  19. Mike Sixel
    Bah, he didn't even hit a HR last night, did he? Bum.
  20. Mike Sixel
    Thanks for the work on this! I really like Granite and Wade a lot....(well, I like others also, but for some reason I wanted to type that).
  21. Mike Sixel
    You'd rather give up players than money? The team has plenty of revenue, when winning, to have a payroll north of $115 to 125MM....
  22. Mike Sixel
    This is a "reward" for how they did, not how they are going to do in the future, isn't it?
  23. Mike Sixel
    if you won't give Grienke that contract....you won't give any 32 YO FA that contract. I think you are not in line with the current market, frankly. That is the market.
  24. Mike Sixel
    Some great seasons, but Gonsalves clearly had the best. Congrats to him and everyone on this list.
  25. Mike Sixel
    AZ thinking they were 1-2 players from being great was only one of their issues. I had no issue with the Grienke deal, it's just money....but the Miller deal was ridiculous. And, none of this even touches on them literally not knowing the rules for trades and other things. Not to mention their utter and complete hatred of advanced statistical analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...