If you put Martin in LF, you have a great defensive OF with him, Buxton, Kepler. With this staff, defense might matter....OTOH, I'm not sure that is the case with AK, Larnarch, or Arraez.
My opinion has nothing to do with "future all star" or not......But 24 year olds that strike out 100 times in A+ probably aren't even future regulars, not in a meaningful way. They can be, but how likely is it, really? I hope I'm wrong. I hope he's great. But I can't see how anyone can look at the age/stats and say he's more likely to contribute to a MLB team than Strotman or some others.
Age isn't irrelevant......Wallner was much older than his competition, and if he progresses at a normal rate won't be a contributor until he's 27 or later. It 100% makes him less of a prospect than a 19 year old playing at that level. I'm with Seth, Walner is outside the top 20 right now.
I don't understand how Strotman, who has had real success at higher levels in the minors, is behind Enlow at this point. Or, even, number 20 at this point.
I think you are really close to an epiphany in the first part of your reply....
More people are moving to Minnesota than out of it.... The data is freely available online.
The cavaco pick was awful when made. And Sabato is likely also.
When you say many believe Enlow will be a mid rotation starter.... Who is that? Because every outside ranker would have him in their top 100 then.....