Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,305
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    337

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Because Pineda isn't in rookie ball. He's getting older and breaking down. It couldn't be more different.
  2. How old was Polanco? Did he miss three years of playing a full season? Not even a little comparable.
  3. Playing Devils advocate, you don't know this for certain. It may be true it may not be true. To be clear, the substance is banned. Taking it is cheating.
  4. I doubt they sign one of those guys. They should not sign Pineda. When did he last play a full year? And he knowingly took a banned substance, screwing the team this year. Perez is a number five starter. Mid market teams should not pay that kind of player more than the minimum. The have to lock up Odorrizi. No way you go into the off season needing three pitchers. Good luck to the FO, they are going to need it. Of course, they chose this path last off season, by not acquiring any longer term players, I have no sympathy at all.
  5. He took a banned substance..... Does it matter why? He hurt the team. Does it matter why, other than to keep himself alive, is there a good reason?
  6. So now they probably won't re sign two of the free agents. And shouldn't sign Perez. Ouch. This is gonna hurt in the post season. And next year.
  7. Recency bias. He was great early, now bad. All we recall is the recent stuff. If the plan includes Perez next year, I'll be disappointed.
  8. which clearly they didn't feel he was doing....so why call him up now?
  9. except that whole pesky....no one wants to give up a draft pick thing..... which, really, would you not give up a first round pick for Pineda?
  10. Except that's not the option.....You need one of those guys to be the number 5, that still leaves two spots open. Cole and ? fill those?
  11. How do you propose getting 4 starters here, if you don't QO one or both of Pineda and Odo?
  12. There aren't going to be two better pitchers than Berrios going to any one team, let alone here. That's just not realistic, given history of all of MLB.
  13. I'm not sure I get promoting Harper. They've seen him. Isn't the goal to see the new pitchers?
  14. Keep one of Pineda or Odorrizi. Sign one of the five best free agents, they have plenty of money. Trade for someone, I couldn't list a specific name, but there will be a decent or good pitcher traded this off season. I can't guarantee it is better than this year, but you can't not sign anyone and go with four rookies. It also isn't realistic to expect them to sign three good free agents, as some have suggested. No team has ever done that. This front office chose to have this problem, by not singing anyone or trading for anyone, and it isn't an easy one to fix.
  15. Ridiculous straw man argument. Seriously, no one has suggested this.
  16. They don't really have an option. They need to keep one, if not two, of the three free agents. Having money, and actually signing free agents you want, doesn't always happen. They'll have to outbid lots of teams for the few really good free agent starters. And no, they aren't going into next year with three or four rookie starters to start the year. No serious playoff contender does that.
  17. Good luck to Gibson. Health issues suck. It also potentially explains this season. I expect Alcala and Hildeberger to be up after Rochester is done. Well, hope on Alcala.
  18. On the plus side, no one is stealing this coach for awhile....
  19. You will be lucky to get two thirds of a year from Pineda. Perez? So, basically the same rotation?
  20. It's clear the bullpen is a stars and scrubs group, or at least it was before all the DFA action. Now? The two new additions add depth and talent for sure. I have no idea if any of the less experienced players are good or not, just not enough data.
×
×
  • Create New...