Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    46,998

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    330

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    It was not a mistake to sign JD to "too much money" before....they were contending and signed a legit big time great player. It isn't their fault the pandemic happened. He was actually healthy most of the last few years, if slow. Fans constantly want them to spend money...they did, when they should have. At a position they needed help at.
  2. Mike Sixel
    It is a great tool, which is why I didn't just answer your question.
  3. Mike Sixel
    Roster resource on fangraphs has all your answers
  4. Mike Sixel
    I'll take the under on that...
  5. Mike Sixel
    There were. If the plan was to acquire expensive pitchers, they could have done that. If that wasn't the plan, why is it now the plan?
  6. Mike Sixel
    Why not just sign a pitcher and not deal prospects for one, if he's pricy? If he's not pricy, you didn't need to free up money. People really think they'll sign Story? To like a seven year deal? I'll be shocked.
  7. Mike Sixel
    Where exactly can they spend all this flexibility?
  8. Mike Sixel
    Why trade for Gray if you aren't trying to compete this year? If you are, where can they spend money at this point?
  9. Mike Sixel
    I think so. But there are random AAAA catchers out there, I think.
  10. Mike Sixel
    They just dealt from the future for a pitcher.... So ?
  11. Mike Sixel
  12. Mike Sixel
    What makes you think there is competition? If Urshela is here, he's the starter.
  13. Mike Sixel
    You think the two they got back are better than the two they gave up? I think Rortdvert is also in the deal.
  14. Mike Sixel
  15. Mike Sixel
    Everyone on this board is a better defensive catcher than Sanchez. And, they have no shortstop again. And urshela? I have no idea what they are doing. They are worse at catcher and still have no shortstop.
  16. Mike Sixel
    In not sure what this means? I said not doing anything in free agency indicated to me they weren't going for it this year. That they were playing for the future. Lots of other here have said the same thing. No one said they saved money for future years.
  17. Mike Sixel
    Agreed . If they are serious about this year, they need more.
  18. Mike Sixel
    I never said that. Not once. Nor implied it.
  19. Mike Sixel
    It isn't playing for the present.
  20. Mike Sixel
    This makes the trade yesterday make more sense. Apparently they are trying to win? The Bundy signing makes less and less sense though.
  21. Mike Sixel
    This. They spent free agency playing for the future.... Then the last two days are all about the present. Baffling.
  22. Mike Sixel
    Yes, he is, if you look at the totality of how he hits, not just one number, and compare him to other players. That said, I think he might hit for slightly more power this year, and it won't be a completely empty 271.
  23. Mike Sixel
    It's all about the prospect. If he's not good, the trade makes little sense. I agree. Not a huge fan of him already being on the forty man....
  24. Mike Sixel
    I'm confused about trading a real asset for short term help, on a team that refuses to have pitching. What's the point, other than losing an asset and taking up two forty man spots? That's backward.
  25. Mike Sixel
    Fair. I don't believe in his bat this year.
×
×
  • Create New...