Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    46,379

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    I'm guessing around tenth best hitting LF this year.
  2. Mike Sixel
    That was my thought as well. If Wallner starts at least 120 games a year, that's a regular
  3. Mike Sixel
    Yes.
  4. Mike Sixel
    Decisions like that are often less than rational.....
  5. Mike Sixel
    I agree with your disagree.
  6. Mike Sixel
    I'm beginning to suspect Keith has some doubts about this team....
  7. Mike Sixel
    Brett 2:02 Have Julien and Wallner shown enough that they can be trusted as regulars? Keith Law 2:02 I don't think so. Both look like platoon players, especially Wallner.
  8. Mike Sixel
    Jason 1:52 Brooks Lee has looked great in spring training. any chance he makes the opening day roster? move Julien to 1st and slide Lee to 2nd? Keith Law 1:52 Also would be very foolish.
  9. Mike Sixel
    Mike 1:43 None prospect question....but the Twins sure are betting a lot on a healthy Paddock and Descalfini after losing Gray. Is this really going to work (in the post season if they get there)? Keith Law 1:44 Paddack has never thrown 150 innings in a professional season, and he's only made 20 starts in a season twice (2019 and 2021). Banking on him as a starter is irrational.
  10. Mike Sixel
    Not a fan unless he's taking near nothing. They have so many holes without plans, and safety is not one of those. It's not like he was good last year.
  11. Mike Sixel
    Another position with a great player and options behind him. Exciting!
  12. Mike Sixel
    What's the question?
  13. Mike Sixel
    Agreed, after this year they should have a ton of money, but you can only buy so many good FAs .. I can't recall any team signing four to six good starters in one year
  14. Mike Sixel
    This is some seriously unrealistic stuff.
  15. Mike Sixel
    Sure, but they have so many holes, so many..... They lose at least three top picks over the next two years to trade up. How do they fill those ... They'll have zero picks besides QB this year before round four of they trade up. So, no real help this year should be expected, while losing Hunter and maybe Risner.... And they'll likely have no first or second next year either..... Trading JJ closes most of those holes. I'm not saying it's a good idea, I'm saying it's something they need to think about.
  16. Mike Sixel
    If they want one of the top 4 QBs, they are dealing with SD......and have to outbid a bunch of other teams. Is that worth it? Will they be bad enough next year w/o a real QB to pick high (I'm guessing no, given JJ and Addison and Hockenson). Therefore, I think they need to ....holds nose and ducks....deal JJ to get a QB this year. If you really think one of these 4 is a top 10-12 QB in the league for the coming years, then ya, trading JJ makes sense. But you better be right. And no, I don't know if I'd do this or not....
  17. Mike Sixel
    No way should MN do that, given the team and cap. They have zero DL and edge rushers on the roster that a team can build around. Zero.
  18. Mike Sixel
    Concur. I mean, later than a third round pick? Sure, I'd consider any starter for a 4th or later pick. Not that you can get him for that......
  19. Mike Sixel
    If you sort that last table inversely, twins are number one! https://blogs.fangraphs.com/accounting-for-free-agencys-biggest-gainers-and-losers/
  20. Mike Sixel
    Pretty solid? Those are all star numbers.
  21. Mike Sixel
    Mookie Betts says hi. But I agree, he's an exception. I think teams are often wrong in this.... But I understand why they act this way.
  22. Mike Sixel
    They'll be lucky to be even a 6 win team, IMO. No QB, No DL/Edge players. It's a barren wasteland outside WR/TE and sort of OL. I mostly blame the previous regime, but this one needs to be a lot better (as we've all said). Not trading Hunter was a massive blunder (they had to be offered more than a 4th round pick). They'll need to sign one good/very good DL and draft there also. They need a QB (hopefully a placeholder and a pick to take over late in the year). They need DBs and Edge like crazy. I see no quick fix, but they will be super flush with money in another off season, and it is fixable if they pick the right QB and 2- 3 other starters this year.
  23. Mike Sixel
    An exciting starter and good options behind him if there is an injury. What's not to love?
  24. Mike Sixel
    Seemed to be bad in the clubhouse the last few years
  25. Mike Sixel
    Just. Say. No.
×
×
  • Create New...