I'm sorry, but that makes no sense whatsoever, by any respected publication or scout or anyone in the baseball industry. I understand we all have our biases, but THAT is crazy... The truth is a Twins Top 15-20 prospect is the equivalent to a Braves Top 3-8 prospect. This is why... The WORST pitching framing catcher in MLB, and a backup catcher, one Ryan Doumit, yielded Sean Gilmartin, who for 2013 publications, beginning with Minorleagueball was their #5 prospect. John Sickels worked for Bill James, he's solid. Bill Ballew, for Baseball America, had Sean Gilmartin as the #4 Braves prospect going into 2013. Bleacherreport had Gilmartin as #8 overall among Braves prospects. Jason Parks of Baseball Prospectus, had Gilmart as #6 overall among Braves prospects. Fangraphs had him at #5 juts behind Lucas Sims entering 2013. Even the latest Baseball America rating of when Gilmartin was a Brave has him as #10. And I don't want to go Allen Iverson here, but "we're talkin about about a backup catcher, worst pitching framing in MLB, going to the NL (no DH). And he's horrible in in the OF too, for the Braves (#5 MLB, #4 BA, #8 BR, #6 BP, #5 Fangraphs) prospect. I don't think Gilmartin will amount to much, but who knows, he had (having) a good Spring Training. But the Braves, just not the same farm system league as the Twins. There's jr leagues and big leagues, the Braves have had a few great classes graduate with Heyward, Freeman, Kimbrel, and co, but this is 2014 and it's not the same type of impact talent there. Even the guy you name dropped, Jason Parks, has the Twins farm system as #1 for both impact talent AND depth. Meanwhile, he had the Braves at #24. It's not even close. Here's some other publications, and Keith Law, who you also named dropped, is here ranking the organizations: Organizational Rankings: Bleacher Report - Twins #1, Braves #21 The Sporting News - Twins #3, Braves #27 Prospect Digest - Twins #4, Braves #26 ESPN, Keith Law - Twins #2, Braves #22 Baseball Prospectus - Twins #1, Braves #24 Baseball America - Twins #3, Braves #26 So we actually have a Prospect who was in the Braves system, just as recent as 4 months ago (this past season) and who's now in the Twins system. And we have a number of major publications, scouts, etc. who've had a chance to place him in the Twins system with an appropriate ranking. And we have the disparaging difference in farm systems, yet a Twins top 10-15 prospect and Correia would yield a Braves Top 10-15 Prospect. Maybe on your Xbox or PS3 where you have "forced trades" initiated. Here's a another publication... The Twins #11 prospect is equivalent to the Braves #3 prospect. Twins 2 - Buxton 8 - Sano 35 - Meyer 61 - Stewart 68 - Pinto 84 - Thorpe 107 - Rosario 109 - Berrios 173 - Harrison 188 - Amaurys Minier 213 - Sean Gilmartin 262 - Trevor May 296 - Max Kepler Braves 47 - Sims 83 - Benthancourt 212 - La Stella 230 - J.R. Graham 267 - Salazar Aaron Gleeman, not an 'expert' or a professional scout, but definitely aware of major publication prospect ratings, has Gilmartin as #40 among Twins Prospects. Seth Stohs has Gilmartin somewhere around #19-#23 among Twins Prospects. The Publications go on and on. Maybe Gilmartin was at worst #10 among Braves Prospects...but, he's not ranked higher than (possibly) #19 among Twins Prospects. Baseball America's 2014 Prospect Handbook had Gilmartin as #10 among 2014 Braves Prospects. Gilmartin is a "45 Medium"...so if you glance over at Twins Prospects, again, just trying to put Twins-Braves Prospects on the same playing field...#14 (J. Pinto) and #15 (M. Tonkin) are "45 Medium" for the Twins...as are...#19 (Taylor Rogers)...then starting at #25 "45 High (risk)"...Travis Harrison, Niko Goodrum, Tyler Jones, Stuart Turner. And honestly, I wouldn't trade any of the Twins "45 Mediums" for Gilmartin.