Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Dman

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    6,117
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Dman

  1. I was one of the doubters. I really thought the Twins had reached with that pick. Happy to be wrong. I hope he ends up proving everyone wrong.
  2. Missed the extra year. That makes more sense.
  3. I am concerned about how this draft stacks up for the Twins. Arizona has like 7 or 8 picks in the first 100 picks so anybody who falls they can pick them up and find the money to sign them. So even if the Twins did find a way to save some money with their first round pick it will be hard to compete for talent with Arizona likely having more money to make deals. For this years draft I would like to see the Twins go with a high school arm with frontline starter potential at pick 13 and a high school bat with the later pick. I think most of the good arms will be off the board by the time they get their second pick however other teams might have a similar strategy and leave a 55 to 60 hitter on the board for us so it might be hard to choose a pitcher in our spot. Lot's of time left for players to rise and fall but we should be able to get a good player at 13 and hopefully grab some fallen players with Supplemental and second round picks.
  4. I don't know. If I am the Twins I might want to see that sub 3 ERA before giving out the money Nola and Severino got. Granted he is a good pitcher as it is and will likely get better, He keeps himself in great shape. Still there is risk that this is who he is and while that 40M extension won't hurt the Twins much I just think they would be looking at a slightly lower number given the info they have. That being said I guess whats a few Million to just get the deal done. We could use his arm for as long as we can keep him. Hard to say who will be successful in the minor's. Here's hoping they can find some common ground.
  5. Dman

    Bowdens top 100

    My Bad on Larnach. I thought he was under 800 for OPS. I must have read that wrong. I don't know why but he hasn't gotten much love in the top 100 or top 150 lists. Must not be as well rounded as some but given his numbers so far the bat looks legit.
  6. Dman

    Bowdens top 100

    Nice to see Bowden give Thorpe some love. Thorpe's K9 has been real good and his WHIP OK. Seems like he should be up there. I am not surprised that he didn't include Larnach as he hasn't been around long and didn't completely dominate while at A ball. Javier didn't play last year so not surprised he isn't on the list. Rooker still has contact issue's and his only real skill is his power. So kind of one dimensional and with his age and the K rate not really someone who would be on my list. The only glaring omission from TD that I see is Balazovic. I think the group underestimated how good of a year the young man had in A ball. He was quite young for the level and seemed to kind of dominate most of the time.
  7. Prospect ranking are subjective so not too surprised there would be variance. I would guess we would only have 3 to 4 players tops in the top 100. They would be Lewis, Kiriloff and Graterol, Possibly Larnach but with such limited at bats it is hard to say how he is viewed. I think about a dozen of our guys that could be in the top 200 need to have seasons where they prove their skills are translating. Some of those dozen players will fail to drastically improve, some will be injured and some will move up. Just have to wait and see what happens but I predict more Twins players in the top 200 next year.
  8. If Kepler improves his batting average to say even 260 I think the Twins will be hard pressed to move him. His defense is close to elite for a right fielder. He has enough power to stay there and K and walk percentage are decent and could get better. He just needs to bring that average up and suddenly he is a great player. Cave's K rate is not great and while his defense would play in right I'm not sure his arm does. Cave's BABIP was also high last year while Keplers was low. Cave is probably the closest replacement for Kepler but personally I think right now Kepler is better and if Kepler improves a little I think he is definitely the better all around player in right field. Wade could probably play good defense in right and he has always had a good OBP but he lacks the power that you typically want your right fielder to have. You could take the trade off but again if Kepler improves his BA a little he looks like the better player. Kiriloff can play right and his bat would would play there but he would be at his very best an average fielder in Right. Personally I think Kiriloff is better fit in left field or first base as he doesn't have great speed for the outfield. He can certainly play outfield but his defense there will likely never be near elite. If Kepler improves his BA, keeps his K rate down and Walk rate up, keeps slugging 20 to 25 home runs per year then he is going to be tough to replace. If he improves I predict he will be a Twin through the life of his contract. I don't see anyone in the system with the number of tools he has and the ceiling he has for that position. If he stays who he is then, Yes I agree with you the Twins have lots of options. Those options all have there flaws but if he can't hit that will be a problem.
  9. I totally agree with you. At first I was surprised as well and then I started to think more about it. Rooker's power is elite but but his K rate isn't good and he isn't a great defender either. Javier had a lost season. You could put him in the list but it seems premature at this point. Gonsalves\Gorden stock has fallen after flaws in their game being exposed. You would have to be a believer to put them in. Enlow didn't pitch many innings and his K rate wasn't great. He was young for the level but probably would need to see more to make the list. According to Fangraphs Thorpe only has average pitches so even with a great K9 they are not believers. Arraez has a great hit tool but defense is only OK. He might have made sense to make it but I guess he just didn't make the cut. They apparently aren't believers in Duran either. Balazovic Should have had the best case to make it. His K9 and WHIP are great. He was young for the level not sure what they don't like about the season he had as it was pretty elite. I guess there are lots of guys to choose from and they liked other guys better. In short although I believe as you stated we have plenty of solid talent on our farm. Some of these guys just haven't quite proven themselves elite enough to make the list.
  10. So Max truly is Max a Million now. Set for life way to beat the odds Max!
  11. We'll see how this plays out but I tend to agree with you. They might be willing to go year to year with Rosario knowing they have Kiriloff, Wade, and a bevy of outfielders waiting in the wings. Maybe he will end up being the odd man out and end up trade bait. Hard to say how the Twins will play it. I absolutely love watching Rosario play baseball. You never know what is going happen when is at the plate, in the field or on the bases. All you know is he is going to pick his spots to be aggressive. Maybe the Twins will find there way to extension with Rosario. I hope they will but I also wouldn't be surprised if they don't.
  12. I agree that if Kiroloff, Larnach, and Wade or Badoo step up then something is going to have give. However, If Max starts hitting as some scouts predict then he would be very tough to replace in right field. He is one of the best right fielders in Baseball right now and if hits like 270-280\330-350 and 20 or more homers per year it wouldn't make sense to move\trade him as he would be one of the best right fielders in baseball. That hit tool is still a question mark but we will get another season to see if he can break out. If he can't become a better hitter then he doesn't look too bad as a center fielder option so maybe then they trade him. Hard to say what the future holds but given what I have been reading my money is on Max improving this year.
  13. I guess I don't understand the logic there. If you have money to spend now wouldn't evenly spreading out the the contract give you greater cost certainty\stability for five years (i.e. Every Year I pay Max 7 Million). If I pay him 3 this year, 5 next year, and 8 the year after. etc. then in future years he keeps bumping my payroll number each future year. Leaving me fewer future dollars to improve the team. If I am a cheap owner then I get why you structure the higher numbers to the later years of the contract as you might trade the player before the entire contract is up thus avoiding paying the higher salaries at the end of the contract. As the player improves so does their trade value. So it gives you an opportunity to not have to pay those future dollars in the end. Granted there is no guarantee that it works out that way for the team but at least the opportunity is there to not have to pay those future years. That is the only reason I can see for structuring salaries with increasing values for future years. If someone else can enlighten me please do.
  14. Seems like a fair deal. Nice to have some cost control, and cost stability with the way they structured the contract. I am a little nervous about him being able to hit but right now there is less pressure on his hit tool because his defense is so good. If he can become a 270 hitter with 20 or more home runs per year this will be a good deal for the Twins. Nice thing about both extensions is if Kepler and Polanco improve we have them locked up through their prime years.
  15. Sometimes I hate how Law stunts my optimism on certain prospects but I have learned he is right more often than wrong. Duran is young and has a good fastball but like most young pitchers his secondaries are suspect. So I can see where Law is coming from. Also it isn't often that we are treated to a minor league no hitter for seven innings by one of our pitchers so I think seeing what we saw makes us more optimistic than most. We will just have to wait and see what happens. Law did not see Berrios being a top of the rotation starter this early either. It took a lot of development before Law came around on him. Duran has the fastball so a little development and he can be a top of the rotation piece as well. Just have to hope he can figure things out.
  16. IN=n the Fangraphs polling it looks like the three batter minimum is the only "New Rule" That fans don't seem to want. It was close to a 50/50 split. DH, 26 man roster and 20 second clock were close to 70% IIRC.
  17. I am totally with you. Everyone wants to see mighty Casey bat whether he hits a home run or strikes out. The raw emotion of that moment, the suspense, the glimmer of hope, beats a pitcher coming to bat. Yeah, yeah strategy and all that is fine for the mind-numbing numbers people but for shear excitement take the DH. Mighty Casey
  18. Three batter minimum seems unlikely to succeed. I am not totally against it as it creates a whole new strategy in the game but it takes certain strategies away as well. DH should have been done a long time ago. I hate the painful pitcher outs in the NL. The purists will get over it and the game will be better for it. 20 second clock, Yes please. I don't need to see guys walk around the mound shake their glove, twist the ball around, stare out in to space for a while and then finally pitch. Mound visits, don't really care one way or the other on this one, but if I had to choose less is more. 26 man how about a 27 man? With all the pitchers on the 25 man would be nice to have some space for platoon players etc. Anti tanking? I agree with the poster above. If the issue they are trying to resolve is FA salaries and not enough competition for players then they should really create a minimum spend for teams. Maybe they need spend to within 10 to 15 % of their net income or something like that. That way no team should be able to tank and make bank. Hope they make some changes soon.
  19. Very nice article. Sometimes you almost forget the human\emotional side of this game that player go through. All these minor league players are very talented just to get this far but it is so hard to be able to play with the best of the best (i.e MLB Baseball). Out of the thousands of guys drafted so few make it. Loved the honesty in Andro's answers. I think I would feel pretty much the same way if I were in his situation. I also love his attitude about being ready to compete and not give up on the dream. Real nice Story Seth. Thanks.
  20. That is an impressive season for a 19 year old in A ball. So far looks to be as good as advertised from the draft. A good season at high A and he'll be moving up a head of schedule. Speaking of A+ it looks like that will be the team to watch this year. With Graterol, Enlow, Duran, and possibly Balazovic you have four young pitchers that appear to have mid to front-line starter stuff. Nice to see some strong pitching candidates coming up through the system. Here's hoping that Enlow is a big part of wave two for the Twins.
  21. Kepler has been picked by many stat guys as a breakout candidate this year. His Defense in Right field was very good last year so the Twins need to know if he is a player on the rise or he is who he is. I predict a long leash for him this year as he doesn't hurt the team defensively and the only way to improve offensively is to get more at bats at the MLB level. Buxton is possibly the best defensive center fielder in baseball so he doesn't hurt the team there. Like Kepler he simply needs to improve his offensive production and I predict the Twins will stick with him all year unless he is absolutely lost at the plate. They have no one on the team that can replace what he brings defensively and if gets going offensively he is a perenial All Star so again I predict a long leash for Buc as the Twins need him to reach his potential for this team to make it to the next level. Rosario almost made the All Star team with his first half last year so I would say he is entrenched in left. So IMO the 4th outfielders identified in this article will be fourth outfielders barring injury to one of the players listed above.
  22. OK I think I am starting to better understand why the FO is keeping all the 4th outfielders. I always thought Reed and Granite were redundant but since Reed is a righty he might fit better as a mix and match for Rosario or Kepler who are left handed. The Twins don't want to give up on Granite after an injured\bad season because even if they don't like him long term in the fourth outfielder spot since he has an option, there is worse case, an opportunity for him to build better trade value for next year or best case prove he deserves the 4th outfielder spot. I really like what Cave was able to do last year and I think he proved he belongs in the Majors. That being said I don't know what his lefty, righty splits are but if they are worse than Reed when it comes to lefties and he has option years left I think the Twins might prefer Reed. IMO spring training is going to be important for all three guys. I think whoever looks best defensively and offensively will likely get the job. That being said I think Reed actually has the inside track as he has no options left. If he has a decent spring and proves himself worthy I think he remains on the 25 man to start the season. Should be a fun and interesting competition to watch this spring.
  23. I hated the Jeffers pick when the Twins made it because it seemed like a reach but what he did this past year in Short Season ball really changed my mind. I am a big fan of Jeffers bat. I can't remember any prospect that had OPS of 1.095 in the Appy league since I have been watching. I was very impressed by what he was able to do. Granted he came down some in Cedar Rapids but his numbers were still good. I think the Twins did well picking him when and where they did. I will be watching him this year expecting great things.
  24. Good point. Technically if they were willing to spend a little money they could have replaced his production via Free Agency. Unfortunately I don't think the arms they added are as good as what they lost in Pressley. So they didn't have to lose present opportunity if they didn't want to.
  25. I liked the trade as well. To me we gave up one year of control for potentially 6 years of a pitcher that could be as good in relief as Pressley was or might even be a starter if the third pitch comes around. As a bonus we also got a 4 to 5 tool center fielder who has been young for the level everywhere he has been so far and been successful so far. Granted you can never bank on prospects working out but the odds of the Twins replacing what they lost looks pretty good to me. Even if those prospects never work out they only lost one year of a reliever, but like I said I like our odds on this deal.
×
×
  • Create New...