Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

mluebker

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    434

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mluebker

  1. mluebker
    Or worse, he is.
  2. mluebker
    Or, to quote Groucho, “Outside of the improvement, you’ll never know the difference.”
  3. mluebker
    Judging by how the language of Falvey’s and Tom Pohlad’s quotes in the press release is virtually identical, that’s certainly what we’re supposed to think.
  4. mluebker
    I’d like more team building and less roster construction. Maybe this will lead to that.
  5. mluebker
    The mock trade article over on Sports Illustrated was more fun. https://www.si.com/mlb/padres/onsi/san-diego-padres-news/blockbuster-mock-trade-sends-byron-buxton-joe-ryan-san-diego-01kfs8b088f1
  6. mluebker
    “…the biggest question is whether the Twins should be targeting a groundball pitcher with the state of their infield.” No, they should be targeting infielders who are solid defenders.
  7. mluebker
    Sure, get him some exposure at 2B and 3B, but maybe not turn him into another utility guy because he can hit. If he looks good at shortstop, strive to make him the best shortstop he can be. The Twins could use one. (And ditto for Keaschall at second.)
  8. mluebker
    You’d think a pitcher—or catcher or pitching coach—would notice when a particular pitch is getting hammered and mention it. I’ve never thought pitching-to-contact—intentionally or otherwise—is a good idea unless you’ve got an air-tight defense out there. And I can’t recall the last time the Twins fielded anything close. Overall, I prefer the old strategy of missing bats as often as possible while staying in and around the strike zone. But you gotta have guys who can do that.
  9. mluebker
    I like a defensive upgrade, particularly behind the plate.
  10. mluebker
    I thought Killebrew was miscast at 3B but was happy enough to see him playing LF or 1B. I like Lemon in the line-up, but not so much in left field. That would have to be Bob Allison—longer career, pretty good power, and definitely a defensive upgrade.
  11. mluebker
    This article reminds me of waking up on a sunny morning, then looking to the northwest and seeing a dark, stormy sky. Might be able to enjoy an hour or two, but you know what’s coming because you’ve seen it so many times before.
  12. mluebker
    Like I said, I’d love to be wrong. And Shelton did the right thing by reaching out to Lewis first thing. So here’s hoping his managerial style and new coaching staff have a different enough approach to young players to start turning things around. Because we’re going to be seeing plenty of young players wearing Twins uniforms this year.
  13. mluebker
    Completely agree. I’d love to be wrong, but Royce Lewis has gone from future franchise player to “What do call it when someone keeps doing the same thing and keeps expecting different results?”
  14. mluebker
    Maybe Buxton was just good, not lucky. Maybe whoever developed his expected numbers for 2025 was just wrong. And yeah, I’ll admit I was one of those guys who didn’t think Buxton was ever going to have a season like that again. But that’s what’s great about having real ballplayers out there instead of hypothetical constructs from the spreadsheets that try to define them—they can surprise you like that.
  15. mluebker
    I'd rather have Clemens playing (or platooned at) first base for his defensive skills and occasional moments at the plate than either of those guys. And I'd rather have probably half the guys commenting here as the Twins GM. At least they're paying attention to what happens on the field.
  16. mluebker
    Stats never tell the whole story. Some guys come up with good underlying number and apparently high ceilings but never reach them. Others have to scrap their way into the line-up, work hard every day to stay there, and end up being of greater value to a team than the guy with more talent. I'm always going to prefer the latter.
  17. mluebker
    So, left-handed hitting outfielders and now first basemen who can’t field. You never know what some people want to collect. This improves the team how?
  18. mluebker
    Sorry, Morris belongs in the top slot. Without him there’s no 1991 World Championship. I value that way more than a lot of home runs over a handful of seasons that only make the playoffs.
  19. mluebker
    There seems to be a remarkable zeal this winter for lousy defenders who are streaky hitters. Maybe look harder for solid defenders who are streaky hitters? With a decent rotation, maybe they could hold other teams to few enough runs that even the streaky guys could put a few on the board and win some games.
  20. mluebker
    Yeah, that’s what this team needs to compete: even more sub-par defense in the infield and continuing musical chairs with the line-up.
  21. mluebker
    Ah, that’s a different issue. This generation of Pohlads don’t seem to be as astute with their money as Carl. So in that regard, you may be correct—even if they’re trying, they may NOT actually be making a profit, although it’s difficult to imagine they’re purposefully trying to lose money. If they were, one might expect them to actually spend enough of it to sign and put nine quality players on the field on a regular basis. But clearly that’s not on their to-list, either. So if they aren’t trying to lose money, and they obviously aren’t trying to put together a championship team, they’re picking some kind of middle position. That, I was inferring, was to at least make the team profitable. If they aren’t doing that, it’s hard to understand why they’re in the baseball business at all.
  22. mluebker
    If you think the Pohlads have been trying to put a team on the field that actually could win a pennant (much less a championship) for the past couple years, we’ve been watching different teams. The evidence is the team’s consistently mediocre performance—they aren’t even a wild card team anymore. The Pohlads seem more concerned about “the stadium experience” than the baseball being played there.
  23. mluebker
    Well, you can either believe your opinions and preconceptions or trust the evidence you see with your own eyes. I’m going with the latter.
  24. mluebker
    We hold these truths to be self-evident.
  25. mluebker
    With so little to build ON, they have to build "around."
×
×
  • Create New...