I think Ruesse knows a lot of about baseball and obviously has a lot of inside contacts, but I also wonder if he is at the point where he is talking to the same people and people who say what he wants to hear making it not the most objective stuff out there (although as a columnist he does not really need to be completely objective). I think he is kind of coasting that this point and might be looking for input that go with the narrative he wants to write. I am not sure he is doing a lot of extra digging at this stage of the game. I used to really think this about Souhan when heard him on the radio. He would talk about what he had heard, and I would not be surprised if he was not a favorite of a lot of people in the club house, so I would wonder how well rounded were his sources. Is it largely people who tend to lean to be cynical and sarcastic?