Just off the top of my head, wasn't Grady Little fired by the Dodgers only after Joe Torre stepped down from the Yankees job? Proven top managers hitting the market is pretty rare by itself. It seems more a sample size issue than one that proves the "ugliness" of such an action. How about we expand the sample by looking at other sports? I don't think anyone bats an eyelash when this happens in a major college sport (except, perhaps, if they were using public funds to buy out the departing coach... or if the attempted upgrade seems futile -- I'm looking at you, Golden Gophers ). In any case, it seems like a distinction without a difference to me. You're still talking about the same personnel business where TERRY RYAN of all people, one of the most universally respected men in the game, fires a man one month after saying he wouldn't. Circumstances change, not usually as suddenly or quickly as a manager opt-out, but they do change. (Heck, one could argue that the Twins may have "waited" to replace Gardy until Molitor was "available" in the sense that he was willing to return to the dugout full-time.) The definitive reasoning for firing Renteria is probably better than many managers receive upon their exit. Again, you can feel bad for Renteria (and I do) without any attributing anything "ugly" to Maddon or the Cubs. And you can also assert that it's an unwise use of resources for the Cubs too. But it's a real stretch to call anything "ugly" here in the sense of unethical or dishonorable.