That's assuming an unfair level of perfection/precision on the umpire, though. It isn't unreasonable, given the natural constraints in place (speed, vantage point, etc.), that in real-time West saw the second swing as greater, or meeting some additional criteria, as compared to the first. Offering the bat at two-strike pitches is playing with fire, and has been since time immemorial. It's a skill to avoid doing that, and to avoid those situations. Hunter getting burned after his second such offering does not seem like an unreasonable outcome to me, regardless of how you want to dissect the performance of West. How much validity does a football team's complaints carry, when they allow a close touchdown on second-and-goal from the 1, after a similar play resulted in no touchdown on first-and-goal from the 1, after they allowed the other team to reach first-and-goal on the 1 in the first place (we'll presume without the aid of a bad call)?