Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Otto von Ballpark

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    20,662
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Otto von Ballpark

  1. I know there are some Lynn skeptics here -- would any have preferred Arrieta? Just signed for 3 years, $75 mil with Philadelphia.
  2. Hughes' contract isn't part of my evaluation, but what they decide do with him is. Adding a couple veteran SP is a hair less attractive if they're not prepared to move on from Hughes, and Mejia gets sent to AAA unnecessarily. Not a huge deal, but could take it from an A to an A- in my book. But we'll see how it plays out.
  3. This is fair. I had them at C+/B- for the offseason after Odorizzi, and B after Morrison, and this definitely pushes them higher. I feel like I should stop short of a solid A until they Hughes decision is cleared up at the end of spring training. It's a tricky situation with the potential to nudge the grade either way.
  4. Good point. It has already been referenced how Bill Smith once had a good offseason of short term deals too. I think the current offseason/team/FO should turn out better, of course, but the question remains, how much so.
  5. 95. 3rd round, but our 4th pick. 75 is the Competitive Balance round, which is protected from forfeiture.
  6. Escobar! He even caught for one inning last year (and the pitcher was Chris Gimenez, no less).
  7. Looking at potential FA destinations, it's worth noting the teams who have already forfeited picks in the 2018 draft: Milwaukee, San Diego, Philadelphia, and Colorado. If they signed one of Lynn, Cobb, Arrieta, or Holland, here are the picks those teams would have to forfeit: Milwaukee: #125 San Diego: #83 Philadelphia: #79 Colorado: #96 Other teams with notably low forfeiture requirements: Miami: #88 Oakland: #84 Cincinnati: #81 As I mentioned in my edit to my previous post, the Twins are in a unique position. Like the 15 other revenue sharing recipients, we would have to forfeit our 3rd highest pick, but because we're not in the Competitive Balance Round A (between the 1st and 2nd rounds), and we're not receiving any comp picks ourselves, our 3rd highest pick falls in the Competitive Balance Round B (between the 2nd and 3rd rounds) and is thus protected. So our top pick subject to forfeiture is actually our 4th pick at #95 (albeit technically our "third rounder").
  8. FWIW, we only saved ~$400k from Leach. Enlow cost $1.25 mil over slot. Most of that came from Lewis going underslot by $1.05 mil. We picked 1, 35, 37, and 76 last year. This year, we've got 20, 60, 75, 95. I don't think another Enlow-style overslot signing is in the cards, regardless. This might be the year to forfeit our 3rd pick. EDIT: Actually our 3rd pick is in the Competitive Balance round, which is protected. So we'd be forfeiting our 4th pick, but 3rd rounder, at #95. Last year the slot was $564k.
  9. Aybar won't necessarily be in AAA, he can opt out of his contract if he doesn't make the MLB roster. Also, while Gordon should be in AAA, he's not on the 40-man roster yet, so I don't think he makes sense in a temporarily replacement role (not like Polanco a few years ago, who was already on the 40-man anyway). Honestly why do you prefer Vargas? He's got a career OPS+ of 102 -- I'm not even sure he's worth pinch-hitting for anyone in our regular lineup. Maybe Castro vs LHP? But Grossman is just as good of an option for that. And Escobar would be too, if he is on the bench. And hopefully Garver would be soon too...
  10. I don't think 2/20 is insulting. Moustakas just signed for 1/6.5. (Doogie Wolfson's first report of 2/12 could have been insulting, had it been true!) KC also apparently offered Neil Walker a minor league deal, which would be insulting too. 2/20 seems like it will be in the ballpark for Lynn, at this point. Maybe the second year is the stretch, but I could easily see him signing a one year deal for $10-14 mil any day now. I wonder if the Twins were willing to do that over a one year deal?
  11. Lynn is almost 31, if he's going to bet on himself, it would be a 1 year deal. (Or include an opt out after 1 year.)
  12. They could be including player benefits as part of payroll -- I know they are used for calculating luxury tax. Cot's estimates them at $14 mil per team for 2018, on top of $118 mil player salaries.
  13. Reserve Champion Beef Showman: note that Acuna spent most of last season at AA/AAA. And there aren't many Acuna's around the lower minors either, and even they fail to reach base 60+% percent of the time against a collection of minor league pitchers including many worse than Littell. Obviously it's not a perfect indicator, but frankly neither are the subjective evaluations that filter through the media. I think it's a decent barometer for fans to gauge spring roles, if not a bit of performance too.
  14. Ha, yeah, I was probably too hard on him. At first I was just needling him, but honestly I don't think it reads quite the way he intended either. Taking a look at the spring training save leaderboards for the last few years was a fun exercise, though! I should thank him for that.
  15. If that was your intent with the line "Zack Littell has had a very strong camp including a win and two saves among his outings", I'd suggest rephrasing it or adding this additional context. "Zack Littell has had a very strong camp, albeit against mostly minor league competition as evidenced by his late appearances in games."
  16. I don't think we've had enough top pitching prospects recently to make this determination.
  17. FWIW, B-Ref has Littell's first two outings (they haven't updated for the third one yet) with a 5.8 Opposition Quality score, which basically means he was facing sub-AA quality hitters. I guess that's what happens when you are racking up saves in spring training. https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=littel000zac
  18. Not to pick on you, Seth, but no one should ever reference spring training saves.
  19. Sounds like a recipe for another $100 million offer for Harper or Machado!
  20. Not anymore, they got rid of repeat QO's in the new CBA. Now a player can only get 1 in his career.
  21. Wouldn't he want a one-year deal to do that?
  22. Buxton will only have 3 years of arbitration before free agency (assuming he doesn't get sent down again ). Although obviously an extension signed now would also include one pre-arb season, like Dozier's deal, so it would cover 4 years total, at minimum.
  23. Responding to myself... The Phillies do indeed have a low payroll this year, relative to their historical levels, but they were one of the fastest movers on the market this winter in landing Carlos Santana, Tommy Hunter, and Pat Neshek. They have a lot of promising players breaking in all over their roster. I suspect they could still use a pitcher, and indeed they have been rumored in talks with the remaining SP, particularly Arrieta and Lynn. (And they spent $17 mil on Jeremy Hellickson last winter, so they're clearly not averse to some investment there.) But they have enough ready young SP, they could always add a Jaime Garcia type midseason. The White Sox could definitely use a CF but the FA market wasn't very strong at that position -- basically just Cain, who got a market deal from the Brewers. They probably should have gone after Gomez. But like Philly, they've got a lot of promising players breaking in right now, especially in the rotation.
  24. Just perusing Cot's, 12 teams have record opening day payrolls for 2018 right now, including the Twins. Another 11 have top ~4 highest payroll in their franchise history (i.e. KCR). Another 5 are basically coming off record payrolls within the last 3 years (OAK, TEX, DET, NYY, and LAD), and while they have all cut payroll for 2018, they are not currently "low" by market expectations (except perhaps due to the luxury tax for NYY/LAD). That basically leaves the Phillies and the White Sox. I guess both could stand to spend more in 2018 given their market, but both have spent pretty recently and also have well-respected baseball operations departments, so they get some benefit of the doubt if they don't want to spend quite yet coming off 66/67 win seasons.
×
×
  • Create New...