Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

AlwaysinModeration

Verified Member
  • Posts

    3,727
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by AlwaysinModeration

  1. This is just me, but I'd like to see Trevor's mom see her son win a World Series ring. As a father of kids in little league now, I particularly like the reminisces back to Plouffe's childhood games. It's hard to imagine the long road ahead for the few who would eventually make it to the Show. And even for someone as talented as Plouffe, it has been a long and winding and certainly not inevitable road. Thanks for writing this piece, Trevor's mom, and happy Mother's Day! (And glad you are a breast cancer survivor!)
  2. Thou shalt not covet thy opposing team's impending free agents, or at least contact them until after the end of season tournament concludes.
  3. "...dominat...esque?" "...dominat...ey?" "...dominat....ish?"
  4. Parmelee, Plouffe, and Dozier. All guys who have had stretches of excellence at AAA. Plouffe and Dozier are showing signs of turning into useful assets for the majors team. I think Parmelee could join them. The three would form a nice core to have the young guys (Sano, Buxton, Rosario) join in the years ahead. In my opinion.
  5. Some kind of California math? Please, show your work. Well, the Twins have been .500 nine different times this season, and they usually field nine baseball players in each game, and 9x9=81wins.
  6. Twins are on pace for...81 wins!
  7. Looking forward to keeping tabs on Buxton again.
  8. I vote crarko gets a vote.
  9. After today, Danny Santana is on pace to be on the roster for 11 games, and on pace for zero starts, and zero plate appearances. But hey, he is taking some practice reps in the OF!
  10. Hey, the Twins hitters are learning a new patient approach....maybe Gardy can learn a new trick too?
  11. Well put, Chief, in terms of arguing that a Drew signing was warranted. While I agree the Twins had the opportunity to sign Drew and passed, I think the team's good start had opened the window back open at least a crack. I am not completely convinced Drew is a great solution. But what bothers me about the Twins' approach (and the shoulder-shrugging "hang on another month or wait until next year" posters on this thread and site) is that the Twins have financial room to add a player, have a position of clear need, and yet aren't trying to do anything about it. My understanding of the role of the front office is to take/set a budget, and piece by piece, marginal upgrade by marginal upgrade, squeeze as many wins as possible out of that budget (ideally, while not mortgaging the future to do so.). The ongoing presence of Pedro Florimon on the roster and in the lineup makes me feel like the front office does not have share that goal.
  12. You may be right. At a minimum, they would need to seek and gain approval for it from the commissioner's office. However, something similar, at least, was explored in the past: http://arizona.diamondbacks.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090216&content_id=3837264&vkey=news_ari&fext=.jsp&c_id=ari
  13. I would be open to other (or maybe even any) approaches to finding a long term solution. But this is a potential short/medium upgrade there for the taking. I won't argue he is a great solution, just an upgrade. If the Twins want, they can make it happen. However, I am suspicious that if they wait until after June 4, they will lose out on him.
  14. You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php/2897-Market-inefficiency-Creativity-needed
  15. I am hopeful Rodon somehow falls to the Twins, but I am not sure how. Free land looks like a good bet to be the Twins' pick right now.
  16. "I don’t think anyone expects guys like Colabello and Kubel to keep hitting." I was was going to say that this was good locker room bulletin board material.
  17. If I am Stephen Drew, I want to be playing baseball, not waiting two months. The Twins have the money to make a decent offer to Drew. I don't think that is the issue--it's the draft compensation. As for collusion, I don't think so. In the past, I seem to recall a team working out a deal with another team so that they wouldn't lose their draft pick. This was back when the draft pick actually went to the team that lost the player.
  18. Right now, one of the thirty best shortstops in the game, coming off a championship season - who should be earning a multi-million dollar salary and starting on a daily basis - is cooling his heels without a team. Other, inferior players occupy starting spots on teams across the league, including, most obviously, the Twins. By now, most folks are aware of the circumstances that have forced Stephen Drew to sit out the opening part of this season. His signing is attached to a draft pick compensation, which has dried up his free agency market. Any team signing him would lose a valuable draft pick in the June draft; either their first round pick, or their second rounder if their first round pick is one of the first ten. If he is signed, Drew's former team, the Red Sox, stands to gain an extra pick in the June draft--a supplemental pick between the first and second round. But Boston only nets this pick if a team signs Drew before June 4. In recent years, MLB teams have grown to increasingly value early round draft picks, and therefore have been increasingly loathe to give them up in exchange for signing quality free agents (who aren't at the most elite levels). This year, the draft is considered extremely strong, making it even less likely for teams to sacrifice their first (or second) round pick. The presumed outcome of the Drew situation is that after June 4, he will quickly be signed by a team. By waiting until after the draft, the team will therefore avoid forfeiting a draft pick. This outcome has a clear negative outcome for Boston - it means Boston will lose out on that supplemental pick they stood to gain. The Twins have an obvious incentive not to sign Drew. They lose their second round pick by signing him. And this makes sense, as the Twins have relied on developing a strong farm system to get their organization back on track after several down years. But the Twins also have incentives to sign him before June 4: 1.a. They are fielding a sub-par SS in Pedro Florimon. The Twins' overall early 2014 performance has surprised many. This early success has led to more optimism about 2014, an optimism that wasn't there for most at the beginning of the season. b. Improving their weakest position, SS, would improve their overall likelihood of success this year. 2. Come June 4, there may be several suitors for Drew's services, when the draft pick sacrifice evaporates. It may be very hard for the Twins to succeed in landing Drew when faced with competition to sign him. Therefore, given the various incentives for the Twins and the Red Sox, it is in both of their interests to work out a deal before June 4. As we know, trading draft picks from the coming draft is not allowed. So to make this work, the Twins and Red Sox would need to work out a trade of players in their systems. They need to trade some prospects. The question is what kind of trade would be fair. For Boston, they should be willing to trade anyone who is valued less than that supplemental pick they stand to gain. For the Twins, they should be willing to accept anything from Boston that is roughly equivalent (or slightly less so) to the second round pick they would sacrifice. The Twins would also need to give something back in the trade. Therefore, the quality of what Boston would give up could be increased, because they would also be getting a (lesser) prospect back from the Twins. Here is what I suggest: First, the Twins come to a verbal agreement with Stephen Drew, dependent on working out a deal with the Red Sox. Then, the Twins trade Luke Bard for Anthony Ranaudo and complete the deal with Drew. The Twins lose their second round pick, but get back a quality arm. I'd prefer Henry Owens or Matt Barnes as the return, or Trey Ball (as a player to be named later, since he can't be traded until after June), but I am suspicious that these would be too far of a stretch. I think this would be a creative solution to an inefficiency in the market the current draft system has created. It would get Drew playing, as he deserves to be, it gets the Twins a better shortstop. (While there is debate over Florimon's worth, I don't hear anyone arguing that Pedro Florimon is a better overall shortstop than Drew). It lets Boston get the supplemental pick they might otherwise forego and it allows the Twins to get something in return for sacrificing their second round pick.
  19. Right now, one of the 30 best shortstops in the game, coming off a championship season - who should be earning a multi-million dollar salary and starting on a daily basis - is cooling his heels without a team. Other, inferior players occupy starting spots on teams across the league, including, most obviously, the Twins. By now, most folks are aware of the circumstances that have forced Stephen Drew to sit out the opening part of this season. His signing is attached to a draft pick compensation, which has dried up his free agency market. Any team signing him would lose a valuable draft pick in the June draft; either their first round pick, or their second rounder if their first round pick is one of the first 10. If he is signed, Drew's former team, the Red Sox, stands to gain an extra pick in the June draft--a supplemental pick between the first and second round. But Boston only nets this pick if a team signs Drew before June 4. In recent years, MLB teams have grown to increasingly value early round draft picks, and therefore have been increasingly loathe to give them up in exchange for signing quality free agents (who aren't at the most elite levels). This year, the draft is considered extremely strong, making it even less likely for teams to sacrifice their first (or second) round pick. The presumed outcome of the Drew situation is that after June 4, he will quickly be signed by a team. By waiting until after the draft, the team will therefore avoid forfeiting a draft pick. This outcome has a clear negative outcome for Boston - it means that Boston will lose out on that supplemental pick they stood to gain. The Twins have an obvious incentive not to sign Drew. They lose their second round pick by signing him. And this makes sense, as the Twins have relied on developing a strong farm system to get their organization back on track after down years. But the Twins also have incentives to sign him before June 4: 1. They are fielding a sub-par SS in Pedro Florimon. The Twins' overall early 2014 performance has surprised many. This early success has leading to more optimism about 2014 that wasn't there for most at the beginning of the season - and improving their weakest position, SS, would improve their overall likelihood of success this year. 2. Come June 4, there may be several suitors for Drew's services, when the draft pick sacrifice evaporates. It may be very hard for the Twins to succeed in landing Drew when faced with competition to sign him. Therefore, given the various incentives for the Twins and the Red Sox, it is in both of their interests to work out a deal before June 4. As we know, trading draft picks form the coming draft is not allowed. So to make this work, the Twins and Red Sox would need to work out a trade of players in their systems. They need to trade some prospects. The question is what kind of trade would be fair. For Boston, they should be willing to trade anyone that is valued less than that supplemental pick they stand to gain. For the Twins, they should be willing to accept anything from Boston that is roughly equivalent (or slightly less) to the second round pick that they would sacrifice. The Twins would also need to give something back in the trade. Therefore, the quality of what Boston would give up could be increased, because they would also be getting a (lesser) prospect back from the Twins. Here is what I suggest: Twins trade Luke Bard for Anthony Ranaudo. And then they sign Stephen Drew. The Twins lose their second round pick, but get back a quality arm. I'd prefer Henry Owens or Matt Barnes as the return, or Trey Ball (as a player to be named later, since he can't be traded until after June), but I am suspicious that these would be too far of a stretch. I think this would be a creative solution to an inefficiency in the market the current draft system has created. It would get Drew playing, as he deserves to be, it gets the Twins a better SS (while there is debate over Florimon's worth, I don't hear anyone arguing that Pedro Florimon is a better overall SS than Drew), it lets Boston get the supplemental pick they might otherwise forego, and it allows the Twins to get something in return for sacrificing their second round pick.
  20. If I recall correctly, Bruno was the coach when Plouffe, Dozier and Parmelee all had big (monster) stretches in the minors, and he was given credit. By the way, striking out 1430 times, swinging like a man, and having great patience are necessarily unrelated events. In fact, a strong argument could be made that they are keys parts of the same overall approach/overall development.
  21. And in June, when the rotation is Meyer, Gibson, Hughes, May, and Nolasco, the Twins will have a chance to actually make some noise this year.
  22. Except those contracts that buy out the arbitration years differ in price (and not insignificantly so) based on how much arbitration clock a player has left.
  23. Hey! I was trying very hard to avoid thread jacking. I will comment on the (obvious) Hughes HOF qualifications on the appropriate thread. This thread, by the way, is pretty funny and one of the better efforts of Twins Daily in some time.
  24. I think a more interesting question is the last day of the season the Twins are not below .500. For example, if the Twins lose today, but hang around 2-5 below .500 all season until the last week and win their last five to finish 81-81, the total will be 6. Or 7. Whatever. But if they lose today and their next 30 ball games, and finish 59-103, the total will also be 6. Or 7. But staying afloat until April 22 or Sept 30--big difference!
  25. Fun fact: If the season ended right now...the Twins would be in the playoffs.
×
×
  • Create New...