If front-loaded contracts--or "aging curve" contracts were regularly instituted, it would cut out a lot of these bloated albatross contracts like Wells and Matthes and Soriano and Howard and Pujols; they could be built so that they were much lower dollar figures in the far years. Tom Tango has for years done great work on calculating, extremely accurately, what sort of contracts free agent players should, and do get. In his calculations, for players in the decline phase (usually post-29), he factors in a .5 WAR decrease per year. At a going rate of 6 million/WAR, it would make a lot of sense to have contracts that look like, in Drew's case: 3/30, with the years being 13/10/7. That would also mirror his expected contribution to the team, and would make his 2016 salary palatable (and maybe more platoonable.) I also thought declining contracts didn't really ever happen, though, but they do, albeit infrequently, and this conversation has helped illuminate this. I also think Drew for 3/30 would be a great deal, cheaper than he is worth.