Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Willihammer

Provisional Member
  • Posts

    7,383
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Willihammer

  1. Ianetta and Ioki aren't going to turn a 76 win team into an 83 win team. The line seems based on the assumption of positive regression across the board, and considering the age of the best players on the team, that doesn't seem likely IMO. Under.
  2. From Fangraphs 2015 trade value series: So yeah, as a pure rebuild play, a fair trade for Trout would be the entire farm plus all the suplemental picks, international bonus pool, and maybe you're getting close. Maybe they throw in Albert and pay for his entire contract to round it out. I really hope the Angels tank now.
  3. I would be really curious to know how big of a factor the options were. Perhaps the Twins felt they could ill-afford for Hicks to go into another sub-.600 slump, and chose to move him for a guy they could afford to be patient with (due to options), and would not risk losing Hicks for nothing. If true, that would tell us a lot about their 2016 eval / expectations for the guy. Or maybe, they liked Murphy regardless of the roster flexibility he provides.
  4. I'd take the under too. Thin rotation, thin bullpen, thin lineup, no farm. Poo-holes is 36. Stick a fork in Weaver and Wilson, they're done. Pretty easy to imagine things going south quick IMO.
  5. I've run out of optimism with Mauer. Still, this spring, he keeps an open channel with umpires, constantly asking about strikes. That's not a good sign, is it? For the prolific OBP guy? Everything pulled is on the ground, everything oppo is a 275 footer to the left fielder. I can't imagine he'll do anything but continue declining this year.
  6. Too far away from the mean to not take the over.
  7. I like the Jays a lot. But, regression's a bitch. Under.
  8. I get that. To complete the picture though, Hicks is definitely going to be an above average glove in the corner. Murphy's glove is much more of a question mark IMO. On another side note, the Gardner-Ellsbury-Hicks configuration is going to cover a lot of ground for the Yanks.
  9. Good point. The system got so wildly out of balance that maybe it would be unrealistic to expect fair value for Hicks. Maybe I am too anxious after watching yesterday's game. Hicks was so solid (and has been all spring, at least at the plate) and Murphy was... unspectacular (and has been all spring). Must give it time...
  10. I'm starting to worry the Twins got fleeced in that trade. Murphy looks like a slap hitter at best.
  11. Yeah I was really hoping, naively I guess, that more of the kids would be stepping up. But that didn't seem to happen. Tonkin with another lousy performance. Meyer has done nothing too impressive. We're back to auditioning the dime-a-dozen Aaron Thompson, Buddy Boshers and Dan Runzlers of the world. Its impossible to imagine that bullpen without May in it anymore.
  12. They already lost Bird, and he wasn't even old. There's definitely upside but with any kind of injury bug they could get thin on power awfully quick. Under for me.
  13. I'd take the over too. They look like the 2nd best team in the division to me.
  14. It is impossibly noisy IMO. The two-strike dynamic, the sac bunt angle, which in truth how many times are sac bunts 100% sacrifice? More like a semi-sacrifice I'd say, in most cases. Bottom line, a well placed bunt is a good tool to have in the back of your toolkit. It shouldn't be front and center like the Twins had with Gogo. There was an article on bunting I had read way back that attempted to put a finer understanding on the effectiveness of sac bunting and IIRC it included a stat that said something like 50% of PAs where a bunt was attempted at one point, the PA reached two strikes and the bunt attempt was abandoned. If you assume that was the case with Gogo, that would mean almost one in 5 PAs were a bunt atttempt. Obviously that was a terrible squandering of his power skill.
  15. Sure, when he got it down. As I said the denominator only includes PAs which ended on bunt attempts. At least I assume that is the case. Maybe someone can correct me if that's not true. If true, any time he squared to bunt, and fouled the ball or missed, took a strike, etc. and found himself in a 2-strike count, would not be counted.
  16. Bunting is fine, hitting is better. I hope the Twins are always challenging Buxton to hit the ball over the fence, and not think about dropping it 25 feet down the foul line like they did with Gogo. Pop quiz. How many of Gogo's PAs *ended* in the form of a bunt attempt? (this excludes the early- or mid-count bunt attempts before going to two-strikes because he failed to get the ball down) Of the 963 PAs he took as a Twin, EIGHTY EIGHT ended in a bunt attempt. By comparison, Andrew McCutchen has 12. For his career. I hope the Twins are serious about envisioning Buxton as a McCutchen type player.
  17. I have to admit when I saw the first article in this series I was in shock and awe about the scope of it - ten players! But here we are. Kudos Jeremy.
  18. Tonkin's average fastball velo is identical to Joaquin Benoit and Ryan Madson's. He has the arm strength. He does appear to throw a 2-seemer and/or sinker instead of a 4 seemer. And he throws his FB a lot- 74% of the time vs. 45% and 50% for Benoit and Madson. Personally I would ditch the 2 seemer in favor of a 4 seem with more rise. Forget ground balls, try to get popups and whiffs. And throw the slider more.
  19. Could really care less about the exact $$ of a Sano extension. It should be a priority though, to lock up at least a couple FA years. Prospects like him don't come down the pipe very often at all. And the longer they wait, the harder its going to be to get done, barring injury, underperformance, etc.
  20. IMHO the Twins have no choice but to go with the youth. Teams don't win with many vets in the bullpen these days.
  21. Seems like a safe bet that Jepsen reverts to his career norms too, and hopefully no worse. That is, probably 3rd or 4th on the depth chart of a good team.
  22. Welp since Feb 1 the S&P is up 2%. I wonder if we are experiencing a "soft landing" in the market.
  23. I know, its ludicrous to even suggest the idea but what if Rosario and Buxton both pick up where they left off, and the Twins have to option Buxton? What's your move? A. Rosario moves to CF, Arcia moved to LF full time, AAAA guy recalled to bench. B. Rosario moves to CF, Kepler recalled to LF full time, Arcia stays on bench. C. Rosario stays in LF, Kepler recalled to man CF D. Rosario stays in LF, Santana employed in CF, AAAA OF recalled E. Other (explain)
  24. Haha Fabulous Freebirds, there's a throwback. Are you going to WWE Live / Trump Rally at Target Center on Friday?
  25. 2014 was a fun class. Lots of intriguing HS arms although some big disappointments so far among that group (incl. my guy Kolek). The college bats as a whole seem to be doing best. Maybe the best retrospective comparisons are Nola and Turner. The Twins seemed heavily linked to both players, almost nobody on the board liked either of them. But they're both doing pretty well. As for Gordon, I just hope the glove is legit. If he can be a stud on defense then he won't need to hit for much power to be an *alright* pick.
×
×
  • Create New...