That's fair, I just think the decision here is more of a toss up than many are giving it. The bunt gave them a better chance to tie, while you're talking about a better chance to win. (Fair to say that perhaps it should've been more about winning than prolonging the game) Also, as you pointed out, not every situation is the same, I think that's important. Hicks was swinging well that game and the bunt guaranteed (for all intents and purposes) that one of your best hitters would get a shot. Is it a great decision? No, I'd have preferred a pinch hit, but it wasn't that awful.