Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

TheLeviathan

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    20,798

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    47

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by TheLeviathan

  1. TheLeviathan
    Nope, . The tracker I was watching showed pitch 4 was outside and in the dirt. So I've learned no to take that tracker seriously!
  2. TheLeviathan
    Was Rosario's at-bat when he had the 3-0 count as bad as it looked on Gameday?
  3. TheLeviathan
    Berrios is one helluva fun player.
  4. TheLeviathan
    Great read, thank you for posting this. Wes Johnson is the kind of pitching coach we have been clamoring for.....well....my entire lifetime I think?
  5. TheLeviathan
    I remember Dan Vogelbach's 2018 MVP award started with his Spring Training leading 7 home runs. We all shoulda seen it coming.
  6. TheLeviathan
    Well, at least we hit that point where we're so ready for the season we've forgotten that Spring Training is irrelevant. It's irrelevant. Mull no more.
  7. TheLeviathan
    I say keep him in the rotation, work on getting a better third pitch.
  8. TheLeviathan
    I thought Pressly credited the Twins for turning him around? The Astros simply doubled down on it to make him elite. I wonder if we'll end up being more content with the bullpen than many of us thought and it will be the rotation that will be our bane. Just a nagging concern I can't shake.
  9. TheLeviathan
    Clearly we should trade for Peter Bourjos.
  10. TheLeviathan
    Well, maybe....we always knew our second baseman would be right behind him for protection!
  11. TheLeviathan
    This is Baldelli getting off on the right foot. Nice lineup construction.
  12. TheLeviathan
    There is a large difference downside (and upside) between us and, say, the Astros. Or Indians.
  13. TheLeviathan
    If I had to bet on what position group is most likely to be the culprit for a Twins rough showing in 2019....it's this one. Too much downside.
  14. TheLeviathan
    All of that can be true and it can still be obnoxious to pay $6 for a hot dog.
  15. TheLeviathan
    I choose not to attend big league games in part because of price gouging, but one thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is that sometimes the prices on concessions are just a big middle finger to fans. Yeah, the clubs can get away with it. Doesn't make it any less obnoxious.
  16. TheLeviathan
    From Fangraphs: The individual weights for home runs, walks/HBP, and strikeouts are based on the relative values of those actions with respect to run prevention. The constant is what puts it on scale with ERA. The multipliers are value driven. And that is different than calculating ERA or OBP. There are no multipliers or value adjustments. (And, before some new tangent arrives, I'm not saying that makes the stat lesser. It just makes it some degree more subjective)
  17. TheLeviathan
    FIP has more subjectivity than, say, OBP. It's about the levels, stats like WAR and a few others certainly have a higher component than many others. Basically, any "value" stats are going to be more subjective than others.
  18. TheLeviathan
    Jorgenwest already tried to help you on this. And the original posters point was on the same thing. I'm not sure how you got on this tangent, but it's a strawman. No one doubts that if you are given 5 x 2 you'll get 10. Of course that's objective. But it isn't whether 5 x 2 is objective or subjective, it's the question of whether it should be 5 or should be 2 and the decisions made in that regard. What's subjective is deciding it should be 5 or should be 2. What you decide to incorporate and how you weigh it is an act of choosing what is most important. That is, by definition, subjective. Now, you can have strong reasons for doing so. You can test it and find the results in line with what you are trying to measure, but nonetheless there are elements that are subjective. Hell, on WAR alone we have multiple ways to calculate it based on what different places choose to weigh. That doesn't eliminate them from being useful, but it pretty much squashes the "objective" argument.
  19. TheLeviathan
    The conversation is not about whether people can read a formula and put it in a calculator, the question is whether the formula itself is too subjective. I don't think that was unclear from the discussion. Your point seems to be an unnecessary quibble given that.
  20. TheLeviathan
    The problem is that OF cannot be elite. What Buxton can provide, if he becomes what we hope, is elite. And it elevates Rosario and Kepler. I hope people don't take too much from Buxton crushing fastballs the first two weeks of spring. April is our true test, anything before that is just nice to hear, but mostly meaningless.
  21. TheLeviathan
    I hope he keeps the K's in check and uses last season as the motivation to put it all together this year.
  22. TheLeviathan
    Correct. I hear the proponents proclaim loudly how they understand that one year samples are not necessarily great use of the metrics, but then think nothing of citing WAR in a one year sample. I look at defensive metrics, I'm not as skeptical as Chief, but the blinders go on REAL fast for a lot of people. It's not purposeful, I think people just like having the quick and dirty stats and frequently forget how dirty they really are.
  23. TheLeviathan
    I also think, should things not go well for the team, that he has more value as a trade target.
  24. TheLeviathan
    I'm not defending anyone, other than against the torches. I too, would like to see Sano stay a little safer in his choices to avoid injuries, but this sounds like dumb luck.
  25. TheLeviathan
    Buxton's spring training performance was brutal last year but you dismissed that (and the equally putrid start to 2018) with injuries. Buxton struck out in one third of his plate appearances in the minors in 2018but yet, he "tore it up" and Sano was bad. (Despite, you know, better numbers). Buxton continues to have similar, reoccurring injury problems. Buxton has had long, crippling stretches of awful hitting. I hope all of those facts are included in that position breakdown as well. I dislike it when someone professes to be analyzing when they are actually doing something more like proselytizing. You are entitled to your opinion that Buxton is more likely to bust out for the Twins. But the amount of Ks he piled up in AAA, the amount of time he missed with injuries, and the putrid start he had last year should be parts of the analysis. I hope they are and it's not all rose-colored glasses and duckies and bunnies. Sano deserved criticism and optimism. Buxton deserves both too.
×
×
  • Create New...