I think the difference is that a democratic gerrymander will stir the right pot. Maybe this is my bias at this time, but most democratic voters are able to realize the injustice a gerrymandered district or state has. Republicans, to date, have been content since it benefits them. I might be with you Brock. Use the same technology the republicans did, screw the system up so bad the Supreme Court has to take action. I'm the mean time, a gerrymandered map for democrats is gut wrenching for Republicans. In the current state it is +5 swing for Republicans... but democrats already have a +3 advantage, and could easily go to a gerrymandered +8. We're talking a 40+ seat house advantage. I'd feel differently about this if the Republican party stood for the same principles it used to. That party is long gone. At this point, the party only seems concerned with big donors, polluting, and evangelicals. They are gong to find it hard to ever win the votes of millennial that don't give a **** what Reagan said in 1980.