Sorry. I haven't been talking about that at bat at all. Others have. I am talking in general, playing baseball, and be present in the moment to make moves outside the "process", moves that win games because a team doesn't always stay in the box no matter what.
Speaking of the shift you bring up, I hate it more when the shift creates hits because the defense wasn't there because they bet on the extreme shift to beat the odds. I enjoy a game where the pitchers field their position and cover the middle better (I guess that is over, eh?). NBA lotteries are set up so the worst team(s) still have the best chance to win the precious first pic. Fundamentally sound, by the percentages. Except, like the game of baseball, especially in the very small sample sizes that the games are on the line, staying with the precious "process" isn't winning the games in the moments games are won, and the worst team(s) in the lotteries with the best "odds" are getting worse than the precious first pick way more often (probably a bad comparison). Even the .300 hitter has better odds to fail that succeed. By over twice as much. Special moments involve different approaches to make better/best teams.
Hey, you love the box. Good for you. I am happy for you.