I don't get that many things right, so I'm going to gloat a bit. I wanted Escobar to stay at short, and Santana to stay at CF and push out Schafer. At this point, Santana/Schafer would have been a wash, but Escobar certainly would have been better than Santana at short. When it looked like the Twins were absolutely set on Santana starting the season at short, I didn't complain too much - might as well try the young guys, right? - but when people still maintain Escobar is nothing but a utility guy, I have to take exception. Every year he's been given the chance, he's been an average or so shortstop, and has outperformed much more highly touted and highly paid players. None of the post hoc rationalizations as to why Escobar actually isn't a major league capable shortstop ever held water with me. After a few years of proof, isn't what he's actually shown himself capable of equal to what we can conclude he's capable of?