1) He's only playing OF for Texas because there were no other openings around the League at SS. Of course he's still a SS. There's no way the Nats would have offered Desmond 7/$107 to play a new position for the same team with no obvious heir apparent 2) Was anyone predicting that Nunez was going to have a career year and be the Twins best player? Certainly Terry Ryan, Rob Antony and Paul Molitor made no such utterances- Nunez started the season as the man most likely to be the first DFA. OTOH,. Desmond on a highly incentivized one-year deal at SS (which he sought in order to get a better offer than the Nats 7/$107) would have made a huge difference solidifying the MI as a proven veteran (picking up some of the leadership void left by Hunter's departure)- who has a career .300 BA and OPS+ of 111 hitting in the 2-hole in the batting order. (Nunez still could have proven himself with regular starts, what with Dozier's horrible start and Plouffe's horrible start, plus his injuries.) 3) The beauty of signing a proven, incentivized veteran in a premier position is the high likelihood of positive ROI. If the Twins had fallen out of contention- Desmond could have netted a nice package of prospects before the deadline. If the Twins had been in the hunt, the Twins would have received a nice compensatory 1st rd. pick after making a QO. If Desmond had fallen on his face, the Twins could have just walked away, after 2016, or even signed him to another lower-cost one-year deal. Isn't it a little too soon to assume that a guy just starting out in rookie ball shapes the Twins' destiny? I'm not buying the notion that Park was bought cheap. The first-year cost including the $12.85M posting fee puts the cost for Park at close to $16M. That money should have been focused more efficiently by filling the greater need in the Bullpen. I get that some remain optimistic about Park, but there are/were multiple 1B/DH/RF options stacked up iwithin the organization- and all are, or will be, playing at the minimum for quite some time. I'm in complete agreement regarding Plouffe and Mauer, but adding Park into this mix was an unforced error that only served to further complicate things, as Park was an impediment to proper roster/lineup construction this year, needlessly risked permanent injury to their best offensive hope in 2 generations. The fact is, Park only becomes more of an albatross, albeit a less expensive one, over the next THREE years.