I agree that the Indians are almost certainly a worse team than they were in 2013. On the other hand, I don't think the Bourn signing was terrible. They got him for a reasonable per year rate and much less than the market originally suggested he would be paid. I'm one of the most vocal people on this forum about hating long-term contracts to speed guys in their late 20s but Bourn's price is reasonable. I wouldn't have signed the contract but for 4/$48m, it's not going to be a disaster. The one big problem I see with it is that it's typically back-loaded. He only made $7m last season and will make up to $14m in future seasons for production that probably won't warrant that money. Cleveland, as an organization, just doesn't have the wiggle room to swallow $14m on a speed guy with no legs in 2016. And it's very possible that ends up being the description of Bourn in just a year or two. Just not a lot of upside there and, as is typical with no discipline burners, lots and lots and lots of downside.