Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    White Sox Winning Winter Meetings Through Day 1


    Seth Stohs

    The Winter Meetings are always a fun time for baseball fans. If you follow twitter or MLB Trade Rumors, there are constantly updates throughout the week, at all hours of the day. There is no question that the Chicago White Sox won Day 1 of the Winter Meetings. Here is a look at what happened on Day 1 in terms of Twins news. (No, it will not be empty below.)

    Image courtesy of Jim Cowsert, USA Today

    Twins Video

    OVERVIEW

    The Winter Meetings were originally set up as a meeting for all minor league teams. Then major league teams started crashing the party and since then, it has become a media Mecca.

    Contrary to popular belief, it isn’t just a place where GMs meet with agents and other GMs. Front offices of the teams go to have meetings.

    That said, of course, all the teams are there. All the GMs are there. All the agents are there. There are meetings.

    However, how many of the rumors will turn into actual transactions during this week? A few will, and we’ll try to stay on top of everything here at Twins Daily.

    WHITE SOX ARE BUSY

    Earlier in the offseason, the White Sox signed 1B Adam LaRoche, and then they signed lefty reliever Zach Duke.

    Rumors throughout the night were that the White Sox and A’s were in serious discussions about Jeff Samardzija. Sox infielder Marcus Simien, who was a top 100 prospect in Baseball America a year ago, was one name mentioned. It’s hard for me to believe he would be the key piece to such a trade. I think the White Sox would need to give up a higher-ranking prospect to get Samardzija.

    Then as midnight approached, USA Today’s Bob Nightengale tweeted that the White Sox signed closer David Robertson for four years and $46 million. The long-time set- up man for Mariano Rivera finally got the opportunity to close last year. He turned in a solid season and got his big pay day.

    There are rumors that the White Sox still could be a player for third baseman Chase Headley.

    Teaming “Shark” with lefties Chris Sale and Jose Quintana certainly gives the South Siders some quality pitching.

    COLABELLO CLAIMED BY THE BLUE JAYS

    Late this morning, the Toronto Blue Jays announced that they had claimed first baseman Chris Colabello. He comes off the Twins 40-man roster, putting the roster at 39. It will be interesting to see what happens in the next couple of days. Were the Twins just trying to clear up a spot for a potential free agent signing? Were they just opening up a roster spot so that they can make a Rule 5 selection on Thursday? Could other players currently be on the waiver wire to create more roster spots so that the Twins could do both?

    Colabello’s story was (and remains) remarkable. The Twins signed him before the 2012 season out of independent baseball where he spent eight seasons. He made the New Britain roster and raked that whole season. In 2013, he was invited to big league spring training and became a hero for Team Italy in the World Baseball Classic. He was named the International League Rookie of the Year and MVP for his great play in AAA Rochester. In May, all that time spent culminated with his big league debut. And, of course, he made the Twins opening day roster. He was named the American League co-Player of the Month in April. Unfortunately, he was jammed on a pitch late in the month and had thumb problems that affected him the rest of the season. Even recently, he learned from an MRI that there was still inflammation.

    It’s a savvy move for the Blue Jays. The powerful Colabello showed that when healthy he can hit and be quite productive in the big leagues. The Blue Jays traded Adam Lind in the offseason to Milwaukee, but then they acquired first baseman Justin Smoak. Colabello could compete with another former Twins player, Danny Valencia, for right-handed platoon at-bats. The other thing is that Colabello still has an option year remaining so he can provide the Jays with powerful depth. Of course, seeing how Toronto has operated the last couple of seasons, it’s also possible that they could now try to sneak Colabello through waivers, too.

    OLIVA, KAAT FALL SHY OF COOPERSTOWN

    At 1:00 central time on Monday, the Hall of Fame gathered the media together in San Diego to tell them that the Veteran’s Committee had elected no one to the Hall of Fame. I think a press release might have done the job.

    For enshrinement, a player would have needed 12 of the 16 Veteran’s Committee members to vote for them. Tony Oliva and Dick Allen both received 11 votes. Jim Kaat received 10 votes.

    Can you imagine being one vote away from receiving baseball’s ultimate honor? One vote! Now, I have said many times in the past that I don’t think that Oliva or Kaat should be in the Hall of Fame, but whenever they are up for election again, I will hope like crazy that they make it.

    MASTERSON UPDATE

    1500 ESPN’s Darren Wolfson posted several tweets yesterday indicating that the Twins have been unable to meet with free agent starter Justin Masterson. It may be that his agent hasn’t been able to work out a time to talk to Terry Ryan. It’s also possible that Masterson just isn’t interested in the Twins.

    Listen, the reason that Masterson is appealing to many as a potential free agent acquisition is that he was coming off his age-29 season in which he posted a 7-9 record with a 5.88 ERA and a 1.63 WHIP between Cleveland and St. Louis. The thought was that he might want to sign a cheap, one-year deal with someone to regain market value, so why not the Twins?

    Part of the allure was that he has some upside and typically has eaten a lot of innings. However, since the hot stove league began, it’s been suggested by many that there are a lot of teams, likely well into double-digit teams, who are interested. That creates a bit of a bidding war. Frankly, it’s not a bidding war I would want to get into. His ERA+ in 2013 was 110, in 2012 it was 79, in 2011, it was 122, in 2010 it was 84 and in 2009 it was 94. That’s not the kind of guy you get into a bidding war over.

    OTHER FREE AGENTS OF NOTE

    LaVelle E. Neal of the Star Tribune posted throughout the day that the Twins have been quite active talking to agents for some free agent pitchers. That sounds good, but the four pitchers that he is linking the Twins with are Logan Ondrusek, Dustin McGowan, John Axford and Alexi Ogando. All four would be relief pitchers.

    None of those names are terribly exciting on a major league contract. I realize that the Twins can improve their bullpen. I just personally prefer going the minor league signing route or using starting pitchers who are not in the starting rotation. Then again, I’m good with anyone on a minor league contract.

    TERRY RYAN NOTES

    In his Monday media discussions, Terry Ryan indicated that he had no interest in the Toronto Blue Jays CEO/President position. He said he is from Minnesota, it’s where his family is and will remain. This is no surprise, of course, since Ryan had the opportunity to be the Blue Jays general manager in 2001 when the Twins were on the contraction chopping block. He could have left then but decided that he was staying.

    He also said that Ron Gardenhire is likely to take the 2015 year off and then determine what he wants to do in 2016. He will continue to have a standing job offer with the Twins.

    COMING SOON: MINNESOTA TWINS PROSPECT HANDBOOK 2015

    Much more will be coming throughout this week, but this year’s Twins Prospect Handbook will be available within a week, possibly even as early as Friday. Co-Authors Jeremy Nygaard, Cody Christie and I are waiting until after the Rule 5 draft to release the book so that we can add (or subtract) any players affected that day.

    This year’s Prospect Handbook (my seventh) is huge, and it’s packed with Twins minor league information. There are prospect profiles on approximately 150 Twins minor leaguers. Anyone from the Gulf Coast League through guys whose Rookie of the Year status remain. You’ll find stories on our choices for Starting Pitcher (JO Berrios), Relief Pitcher (Brandon Peterson), Hitter (Mitch Garver) and Manager (Doug Mientkiewicz) of the Year. Jeremy takes a look at the Twins draft in 2014 and looks ahead to the 2015 draft when the Twins have the sixth selection. Cody took a look at the injuries. We also had articles from Steve Buhr, Eric Pleiss and former Twins minor leaguer AJ Pettersen.

    I’m also excited to say that St. Paul Pioneer Press’s Mike Berardino wrote a terrific foreword for the book. We also want to thank Linwood Ferguson for his pictures of the Ft. Myers players and Steve Buhr for pictures from Cedar Rapids.

    As I mentioned, there will be much more information coming in the next few days. If you’re looking for a Christmas gift or stocking stuffer, consider getting a copy of the 2015 Minnesota Twins Prospect Handbook.

    ccs-19-0-13266000-1418107858_thumb.jpg

    WHAT WILL HAPPEN ON DAY 2?

    The White Sox won Day 1 of the Winter Meetings in San Diego. What will happen on Day 2? Will the Twins make any news?

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Moderator warning: The bickering needs to stop.  Have a discussion and at some point, agree to disagree.  Try not to make this personal by telling other posters they are off the rails, or need decaf, or just don't get it.  Make your points without going there.  Warnings are and will continue to be issued.  It's frustrating to be losing and feel that issues aren't being addressed as we think they should be, but I think we can all express this without delving into the trolling and disrespect and non sequitur realms.  Thank you!

    They don't really need future luck to have a meaningfully strong rotation -- they've got one at present.  Sale, Quintana, and now Samardzija.

     

    I'd argue that even with TR's guidance, the Twins draft-and-develop approach is probably more dependent on "luck" (with less yearly breakout potential) than the White Sox more aggressive approach.

    How many starters in a given rotation go down for a lengthy period in a season? Two? Most teams end up using what, 7-8 starters in a season? That's the luck I'm talking about. 

     

    If Detroit loses two starters, they have Buck Farmer and a desperate trade to make. The Whities, I'll grant, have a little more depth. But I'll take our current veteran rotation plus May, Meyer, Berrios, Stewart, Thorpe, Gonsalves, Hu, Wheeler, and Rogers et al on a five-year plan over what the Whities have going at the moment.

     

    The Sox will be improved, but so will the Twins. Hahn is probably taking the right approach for them, all things considered, but that doesn't make me think the Twins are in the midst of a failed strategy or something. I think the Twins, if they execute reasonably well, will have a more sustainable foundation.

    I don't think anyone believes the White Sox have been a perfectly run franchise or even a better one than the Twins. I certainly wouldn't have traded what the Sox did for a 38 year old David Wells, for example. A 6th rounder and a 16th rounder for a 30 year old Samardzija, who worshipped the White Sox as a kid, seems a lot more reasonable IMO.To your second point, the Twins and White Sox are basically polar opposites of each other in how they handle prospects - one uses them as a pipeline of talent and the other uses them as currency, its interesting to compare the results of the two strategies. And 1150 wins doesn't mean much without some context. Also this is a Twins forum.

    Yeah the price for Shark is reasonable, rental price or no, and is like Laroche a lot at his price. All that said, I wouldn't declare this anything more than an aggressive, interesting set of moves because we've seen these same moves fail often.

     

    Personally I prefer an organization that operates closer to the middle of those two poles you speak of. I see some smart ideas in both, but often carried too far.

    And over the past 9 years, they have a .495 winning percentage, with 1 post season appearence (thanks to a Jim Thome homer). The same period of time shows the Twins to have a .485 WP, and 3 post season entries. Since 2006, the Sox have yet to post consecutive winning seasons. I don't think the Twins want to go about emulating that. 

     

    I think we're past the point where simple post season "entries" are something we place as our goal.  I'll be happy to see the White Sox crash and burn, but they are putting together a pitching staff that looks like it may be capable of taking home with World Series.  I doubt they will, but at least they recognize what their pitchers need to look like. 

     

    They Twins haven't put together a pitching staff that looked like it could win a World Series in 24 years.  The last time the Twins actually fielded a staff capable of winning a championship, they actually did.  Three studs up front and a rock solid back of the bullpen and you give yourself a chance. 

    Personally I prefer an organization that operates closer to the middle of those two poles you speak of. I see some smart ideas in both, but often carried too far.

     

    I do too, perhaps partially because I like the chemestry when your core guys came up together, but it certainly does look like the on the 10 year anniversary of their WS championship they are trying to copy the formula.  That year they signed Jermaine Dye, Tag Iguchi and Aj Pierzynski, along with they back of their bullpen Dustin Hermanson and Luis Vizcaino while trading for Carl Everett, Freddie Garcia, Orlando Hernandez and Jose Contreras.  Obviously some moves were better than others, but enough worked out.

    I trust the Ivy League and Northwestern Kellogg School of Management guy to understand how to make the new economics of baseball work- and they've proven more than capable of extricating themselves from no longer desirable contracts just over the last year.  I think the new tidal wave of money flowing into baseball isn't fully yet appreciated.

     

    $90M last year + $39M that they have added already would get me to $129M.  That is more than their highest payroll of all time, which was in 2012 of $127M. I don't  ever see them as being a $170-200M payroll team.  So this team plus another $10-15M in payroll does not look like a world series champion to me.  Nor are they investing in young players.

     

    The Twins start with say $70-75M in 2016 (lose Hunter and Pelf).  We have Buxton, Sano, Meyer, and Berrios (among others) and could theoretically add another $40-50M......we are going to be OK boys and girls. I would honestly not trade franchises this second if I wanted to build a contender. 

     

    Which position would you guys rather be in over the next five years?

    Edited by tobi0040

    It's only money. Isn't there some middle ground between the Sox and Twins?

    Yes - the middle ground rhymes with "The Faint Bluest Dardanelles"

     

    I think the difference between the Sox and Twins means that in order to be competitive any time soon, the White sox had no choice but to make large FA signings and trade whatever prospects they think they can spare.

    The Twins have been slowly (re)building the farm and as a result, there's less urgency in the front office to make a big reach now. The Twins will wait for the next crop prospects to arrive and then contend for a few seasons before starting over.

    The owner makes money, the fans have something to hope for, almost everyone is happy.

    Recalling with fondness that the Twins in fact did NOT field a staff capable of winning a WS in 1987, and they won anyway, with fearsome Les Straker taking the hill as our third starter.

     

    Irrelevant fun fact here. 

     

    Yeah, 87 was not a great staff despite having a Cy Young Award winner and a HOFer.  That was reflected by their meager 85 regular season wins.  You can get lucky, few teams have recently but it's possible. However, I think to give your team a realistic chance, you need to put together an elite staff and hope it's enough.

    Recalling with fondness that the Twins in fact did NOT field a staff capable of winning a WS in 1987, and they won anyway, with fearsome Les Straker taking the hill as our third starter.

     

    Irrelevant fun fact here. 

    Yeah, but the 87 Twins had the almighty pitching power of Mike Smithson!!!  

    Last year they fielded a 73 win team for 90M.  They don't lose any large contracts.

    Dunn.  And if we're counting Zach Duke's ~$5 mil AAV on one side of the ledger, it seems only fair to include similar yearly salaries they are shedding in the form of Lindstrom, Beckham, De Aza, and Downs, not to mention Bellisario and Konerko close to ~$3 mil each.

    Recalling with fondness that the Twins in fact did NOT field a staff capable of winning a WS in 1987, and they won anyway, with fearsome Les Straker taking the hill as our third starter.

     

    Irrelevant fun fact here. 

     

    Well... Straker was meant to be the fifth man in a 5 man pitching staff, at an era when the 5th man was a spot starter.  He actually rose above the occasion with a 103 ERA+, not too shabby for your third best starter.   Smithson, a veteran with success who led the AL for the Twins in GS in 84 and 85 was number 3, and an up and coming phenom (who later ate his way out of baseball,) Mark Portugal, was supposed to be the number 4.  The difference between Ryan and MacPhail is that when the latter two faltered, MacPhail was never afraid to trade his backup catcher to the Yankees for a veteran work horse with a ridiculous contract (Niekro) or a C prospect to the Indians for a future Hall of Famer (Carlton.)  

    Edited by Thrylos

    Dunn.  And if we're counting Zach Duke's ~$5 mil AAV on one side of the ledger, it seems only fair to include similar yearly salaries they are shedding in the form of Lindstrom, Beckham, De Aza, and Downs, not to mention Bellisario and Konerko close to ~$3 mil each.

     

    On that Cot's site, they didn't have Dunn listed to get to the $90M because he was traded to Oakland.  I only looked at the top 7-8 paid guys and because I am lazy didn't look much below that.  The broader point remains. 

     

    Would anyone trade franchises with them right now?  If not, we probably should not get too worked up.

    If Detroit loses two starters, they have Buck Farmer and a desperate trade to make. The Whities, I'll grant, have a little more depth. But I'll take our current veteran rotation plus May, Meyer, Berrios, Stewart, Thorpe, Gonsalves, Hu, Wheeler, and Rogers et al on a five-year plan over what the Whities have going at the moment.

    First of all -- the five-year plan seems an odd way to put this.  Sale and Quintana were top 10 pitchers in MLB fWAR last year, and they're both young and signed cheaply for the next 5-6 seasons.  Depth is nice, but I'm not sure compiling a list of mostly B-/C+ prospects from the low minors really closes that huge gap.

     

    Not to mention that there isn't anything precluding the White Sox from adding to that plan over the next five years, just like they did yesterday (adding #15 pitcher in 2014 MLB fWAR).

    $90M last year + $39M that they have added already would get me to $129M.  That is more than their highest payroll of all time, which was in 2012 of $127M. I don't  ever see them as being a $170-200M payroll team.  So this team plus another $10-15M in payroll does not look like a world series champion to me.  Nor are they investing in young players.

     

    The Twins start with say $70-75M in 2016 (lose Hunter and Pelf).  We have Buxton, Sano, Meyer, and Berrios (among others) and could theoretically add another $40-50M......we are going to be OK boys and girls. I would honestly not trade franchises this second if I wanted to build a contender. 

     

    Which position would you guys rather be in over the next five years?

    The White Sox are actually at about $104 million estimated for 2015 right now.

     

    Before trading for Samardzija and signing Robertson, B-Ref actually had their projected payrolls lower than those of the Twins for 2015, 2017, and 2018.

     

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/CHW/2014-payroll-salaries.shtml

     

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/MIN/2014-payroll-salaries.shtml

     

    Even with the latest acquisitions, they are still within ~10% of the Twins projected payroll for those seasons, and it is less concentrated than that of the Twins (Mauer).

    The White Sox are actually at about $104 million estimated for 2015 right now.

     

    Before trading for Samardzija and signing Robertson, B-Ref actually had their projected payrolls lower than those of the Twins for 2015, 2017, and 2018.

     

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/CHW/2014-payroll-salaries.shtml

     

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/MIN/2014-payroll-salaries.shtml

     

    Even with the latest acquisitions, they are still within ~10% of the Twins projected payroll for those seasons, and it is less concentrated than that of the Twins (Mauer).

     

     

    I think the White Sox extend Jeff S at about $20M a year, starting as early as next year.  That puts them about $115M assuming they fill out their roster with young players.  At this point that may not be an accurate assumption.  If they are over $120M they are near their highest point.

     

     

    I know I would not trade spots with them right now.  Would anyone else? 

    Edited by tobi0040

    I'm not sure if the White Sox approach is the perfect one to emulate. But when you are on pace for your FIFTH 90+ loss season in a row, haven't won a playoff series in the better part of a decade, and haven't sniffed a World Series since the first Bush was president, I don't think it's too much to ask that they start emulating ANYONE other than themselves.

    I don't think there's much question they are in a better spot than the Twins to compete for the next 5 years. But if the 2000s were any indication they'll make a boneheaded move, maybe two before the term is over and at that point the Twins draft and hold policy will start to gain ground on them.

    Sox still need a Catcher, 3rd Base, Left Field and could probably use a bench bat and more help in the bullpen.

    They're probably looking to improve at the spot anyway, but the White Sox starting catcher actually bested ours in 2014 rWAR (and is younger and cheaper with only year-to-year commitments for the next 3 seasons).

     

    Similarly, their third baseman's stats actually look not dissimilar to our 3B at the same age (Plouffe two years ago, although I will grant Gillaspie looks less likely to improve defensively).

     

    They've got an exciting young free swinging Venezuelan in one of the outfield corners... sound like anyone else we know? :)  (Admittedly they need their own Torii Hunter for the other corner and/or DH.)

     

    And they've already dropped the 3 worst performers from last year's bullpen and replaced them with two guys from the top of last year's K/9 leaderboards.

     

    Again, they are far from perfect, and I imagine they are still looking to add a bat or two (or three!).  But they've got a WAY better pitching staff in the immediate future, and roughly equal total future contractual commitments.  The main Twins advantage is indeed "farm system" which is important but feels a lot less dependable than an existing MLB talent advantage.

     

    In a hypothetical world where a genie offers a complete organizational trade, you'd have to be tempted, right?  Sale, Quintana, Abreu, and Eaton are four of the best in the game right now, and all cheap and controlled for 4-6 seasons.  Seems like the Twins, even with the farm system advantage, would be lucky to be in a similar situation as far as top-end talent and control in the near future.

    I don't think there's much question they are in a better spot than the Twins to compete for the next 5 years. But if the 2000s were any indication they'll make a boneheaded move, maybe two before the term is over and at that point the Twins draft and hold policy will start to gain ground on them.

     

    Like hire a manager who likes to play station to station baseball and a GM who likes everyone to hit the ball 500 feet.

    I think the White Sox extend Jeff S at about $20M a year, starting as early as next year.  That puts them about $115M assuming they fill out their roster with young players.  At this point that may not be an accurate assumption.  If they are over $120M they are near their highest point.

    As you say, that may not be an accurate assumption.

     

    Plus, they could let Samardzija walk and still project to have a better staff than the Twins for awhile.  Sale and Quintana are really that valuable right now.  Further, the White Sox shed almost $40 mil per year after 2016 in just three mostly supporting players: Ramirez, Laroche, and Danks.

     

     

    Also, the Twins might be very close to a similar extension crunch with Hughes, only it could be a lot tighter if we don't quickly develop some other high-level starters to fall back on.

    They're probably looking to improve at the spot anyway, but the White Sox starting catcher actually bested ours in 2014 rWAR (and is younger and cheaper with only year-to-year commitments for the next 3 seasons).

     

    Similarly, their third baseman's stats actually look not dissimilar to our 3B at the same age (Plouffe two years ago, although I will grant Gillaspie looks less likely to improve defensively).

     

    They've got an exciting young free swinging Venezuelan in one of the outfield corners... sound like anyone else we know? :)  (Admittedly they need their own Torii Hunter for the other corner and/or DH.)

     

    And they've already dropped the 3 worst performers from last year's bullpen and replaced them with two guys from the top of last year's K/9 leaderboards.

     

    Again, they are far from perfect, and I imagine they are still looking to add a bat or two (or three!).  But they've got a WAY better pitching staff in the immediate future, and roughly equal total future contractual commitments.  The main Twins advantage is indeed "farm system" which is important but feels a lot less dependable than an existing MLB talent advantage.

     

    In a hypothetical world where a genie offers a complete organizational trade, you'd have to be tempted, right?  Sale, Quintana, Abreu, and Eaton are four of the best in the game right now, and all cheap and controlled for 4-6 seasons.  Seems like the Twins, even with the farm system advantage, would be lucky to be in a similar situation as far as top-end talent and control in the near future.

     

    I mean, compared to a team that lost 90+ games 4 years in a row, sure the White Sox look pretty good.

     

    I was responding more to the tenor of comments saying that Sox were now the favorites to win the division and/or serious playoff contenders this year. I don't think they have done enough yet this offseason, and we haven't seen what the rest of the league will do yet.

     

    But if there's comparisons to be made:

    I think Plouffe is better than Gillaspie, both now and when Plouffe was Gillaspie's age. I'd take Plouffe over him. Also, I'd take Sano over Gillaspie for the next decade or two.

    I'd take Dozier over the current hole at 2B in Chicago, too.

    I think both outfield corners in Chicago are suspect. Viciedo and Avisail Garcia are both trouble. The Twins can't really talk in that department, though, so I won't belabor that point.

    Catching... ? Tyler Flowers and Nieto? I'd honestly rather have Kurt Suzuki and Josmil Pinto. If Molitor would let Pinto have more playing time in 2015 than Gardy was giving him, I like what the Twins have even more.

    The Sox have a better rotation, no argument from me there. The bullpens I think will depend on what the Twins do in the offseason and how fast the 2013 and 2014 draft class moves up. 

    First of all -- the five-year plan seems an odd way to put this.  Sale and Quintana were top 10 pitchers in MLB fWAR last year, and they're both young and signed cheaply for the next 5-6 seasons.  Depth is nice, but I'm not sure compiling a list of mostly B-/C+ prospects from the low minors really closes that huge gap.

     

    Not to mention that there isn't anything precluding the White Sox from adding to that plan over the next five years, just like they did yesterday (adding #15 pitcher in 2014 MLB fWAR).

     

    I get why Hahn is doing what he's doing. I said earlier that it makes sense to skin the cat the way he's doing it given their situation. But I need to correct your statement: May, Meyer, and Berrios are B+ prospects, not part of a compilation of "B-/C+ prospects from the low minors", and the others mentioned are all better than what that suggests, really. But talking about individual prospects misses the point about the  advantages of having high-level talent at all levels. If you accept the benefits of this, talking about a five-year horizon doesn't sound odd, spycake. The Shark trade illustrates this well, as the Sox further decimated a weak system for a #2-3 starter who will cost a fortune in a year. Another example: Detroit just gave up two of their ten best prospects for a #4-5 starter. Purging those same like-quality prospects from the Twins system would barely impact  their future.

     

    Again, I'm not criticizing Hahn's approach and acknowledge he could add to the $104M payroll as a means of sustaining things in the absence of an incredible prospect pipeline like the Cubs and Twins have (although he now has fewer prospect chips, right?). But I am defending the Twin's approach and will go a step further to say it's a more sustainable strategy, even without considering the economic side of it all beyond player value.

    I don't think there's much question they are in a better spot than the Twins to compete for the next 5 years. But if the 2000s were any indication they'll make a boneheaded move, maybe two before the term is over and at that point the Twins draft and hold policy will start to gain ground on them.

    Just scanning their yearly rosters at B-Ref, I don't see many boneheaded moves.  The Nick Swisher fiasco in 2008 was obviously the big one, losing Gio Gonzalez in the process.  Carlos Quention was a loss in 2012, although his subsequent salaries and health greatly reduce the level of boneheadedness.  I've seen the Peavy trade cited a few times in this thread, but it didn't really hurt them (actually netted them Avisail Garcia in the end).  Edwin Jackson for Daniel Hudson?

     

    Signing Dunn wasn't a good move, but it was only cash and not a crippling amount (Nolasco money).

     

    This is a team that hasn't bottomed out much or for very long since I became a baseball fan (1990).

    Just scanning their yearly rosters at B-Ref, I don't see many boneheaded moves.  The Nick Swisher fiasco in 2008 was obviously the big one, losing Gio Gonzalez in the process.  Carlos Quention was a loss in 2012, although his subsequent salaries and health greatly reduce the level of boneheadedness.  I've seen the Peavy trade cited a few times in this thread, but it didn't really hurt them (actually netted them Avisail Garcia in the end).  Edwin Jackson for Daniel Hudson?

     

    Signing Dunn wasn't a good move, but it was only cash and not a crippling amount (Nolasco money).

     

    This is a team that hasn't bottomed out much or for very long since I became a baseball fan (1990).

     

     

    I mean, compared to a team that lost 90+ games 4 years in a row, sure the White Sox look pretty good.

     

    I was responding more to the tenor of comments saying that Sox were now the favorites to win the division and/or serious playoff contenders this year. I don't think they have done enough yet this offseason, and we haven't seen what the rest of the league will do yet.

     

    But if there's comparisons to be made:

    I think Plouffe is better than Gillaspie, both now and when Plouffe was Gillaspie's age. I'd take Plouffe over him. Also, I'd take Sano over Gillaspie for the next decade or two.

    I'd take Dozier over the current hole at 2B in Chicago, too.

    I think both outfield corners in Chicago are suspect. Viciedo and Avisail Garcia are both trouble. The Twins can't really talk in that department, though, so I won't belabor that point.

    Catching... ? Tyler Flowers and Nieto? I'd honestly rather have Kurt Suzuki and Josmil Pinto. If Molitor would let Pinto have more playing time in 2015 than Gardy was giving him, I like what the Twins have even more.

    The Sox have a better rotation, no argument from me there. The bullpens I think will depend on what the Twins do in the offseason and how fast the 2013 and 2014 draft class moves up. 

     

     

    I think the only time to panic is if their future (2 years to 6-7 years) looks brighter than ours.  I don't think it does.

     

    I think some are feeling left out because action is going on around the league and as usual, we are having no part of it.  But I don't think these are the types of moves we should be worrying about.  They seem to be buying high on guys, adding 30+ year olds, overpaying for average at best bats, spending where they should not be spending (closers, DH), etc.  These are not the types of decisions over time that pay off at a reasonable rate.

    Just scanning their yearly rosters at B-Ref, I don't see many boneheaded moves.  The Nick Swisher fiasco in 2008 was obviously the big one, losing Gio Gonzalez in the process.  Carlos Quention was a loss in 2012, although his subsequent salaries and health greatly reduce the level of boneheadedness.  I've seen the Peavy trade cited a few times in this thread, but it didn't really hurt them (actually netted them Avisail Garcia in the end).  Edwin Jackson for Daniel Hudson?

     

    Signing Dunn wasn't a good move, but it was only cash and not a crippling amount (Nolasco money).

     

    This is a team that hasn't bottomed out much or for very long since I became a baseball fan (1990).

     

    They've also devoted significant resources and been basically the same as us the last decade.  It's not that any of their moves are horrible, it's just that they are always thin (which bites them in little ways that hold them back), they're always chasing, and they're always inconsistent.  (Odd as that might sound)

     

    Every now and then those inconsistencies smooth out and they perform decently, but just as often the patchwork roster construction and thin depth catch up to them and they give 500 at-bats to Gordon Beckham, Jeff Keppinger, or keep shoving Jordan Danks out there.  (Or John Danks for that matter)

     

    None of that is to put the Twins on a pedestal.  In my opinion they both suffer from the same problem of being too comfortable in their heavy handed approach.  (Over Aggressive vs. Pathological fear of Aggression)

    But I need to correct your statement: May, Meyer, and Berrios are B+ prospects, not part of a compilation of "B-/C+ prospects from the low minors", and the others mentioned are all better than what that suggests, really. 

    My post said "mostly" and I stand by it.  Sickels has Meyer and Berrios (and Stewart) as the only Twins pitching prospects above a B- grade. 

     

    If you accept the benefits of this, talking about a five-year horizon doesn't sound odd, spycake.

     

    ...

     

    But I am defending the Twin's approach and will go a step further to say it's a more sustainable strategy, even without considering the economic side of it all beyond player value.

    What was weird about the 5 year horizon is that Sale and Quintana are two of the youngest, best starters in MLB, both controlled cheaply for next 5-6 years.  This isn't even a Verlander (expensive) or Price (expensive or gone soon) situation.  A Sale-Quintana (plus Samardzija) situation anytime in the next few years would pretty much be a best-case scenario for the Twins plan -- how can another team, having achieved that best-case scenario, somehow ranked behind the Twins who have achieved virtually none of it yet?

     

     

    Looking at the White Sox record as a franchise the last 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 years, it's hard to see how their approach is less sustainable than that of the Twins.

    It should have been pretty obvious the White Sox were going on a spending spree this offseason.  They shed Dunn, De Aza, Beckham, Lindstrom, Downs, Belisario, Konerko and Paulino since the start of the 2014 season.  That was a lot of marginal production and roster spots eating up $35M.

     

    They deserve credit in that regards given that they were able to give themselves a lot more roster and financial flexibility.  The Twins could take some notes in that regard. 

     

    It was less expected that the Sox would sign 2 free agent relievers and trade for one year of a quality SP in this time frame.  However, it don't see the condensed timing as a reason to congratulate them.  It should be interesting to see how it turns out with a $12M closer for 4 years and $5M set up guy for 3 years who just had his first decent season since 2009.  It'll also be interesting to see if they retain Samardzija and at what cost ($$$$$). 

     

    They win "most early offseason action", but I'm far from calling these moves a winner.

    The Samardzija deal is actually a 6 player deal.  Sox get Ynoa, who has flopped. 

     

     

    http://fantasynews.cbssports.com/fantasybaseball/update/24876421/white-sox-acquire-samardzija-ynoa-in-six-player-deal-with-as

     

    The A's think Semien will be there SS next year. 

     

    Manual has Ravelo as #10 for them.

     

    Bassitt has a 3.94 ERA in 30 IP in the big's.

     

    Phegley is a 26 year old catcher that hit well in the minors the last few.  .966 and .861 the last two years.

    Edited by tobi0040



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...