Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Twins Could Look Completely Different After the Trade Deadline

    The Twins still have time to climb back into the AL Central race, but if they become sellers, this roster could undergo some major changes over the next month.

    Sam Caulder
    Image courtesy of © Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    We're already counting down the days until the MLB Trade Deadline on August 3, but there's still a lot of uncertainty surrounding what exactly the Minnesota Twins should do. Depending on who you ask, you'll get a completely different answer.

    A lot of people think the Twins should be sellers once again. At the same time, there's still a sizable group that believes Minnesota should be an aggressive buyer, especially considering how underwhelming the AL Central has been this season. This time of year always makes things difficult. We're just over halfway through the season, but the standings remain incredibly tight. It's hard to know exactly where teams stand when one good week can completely change the outlook of a division race. There's still time for the Twins to gain some clarity, but the pressure is about to ramp up in a hurry.

    So, what should the Twins do at this year's trade deadline? And what would each path mean for the rest of the roster? A lot of that answer, obviously, depends on where they sit in about two weeks. The Twins currently own a 39-44 record, but they're still only 4.5 games behind in the AL Central. That's close enough to keep hope alive, but far enough back that another rough stretch could all but end any realistic postseason aspirations.

    The next 12 games should tell us a lot. Minnesota has three-game series coming up against the Rockies, Astros, Yankees and Guardians. If they somehow manage to go 8-4 during that stretch, the conversation around this team could look drastically different than it does today. On the flip side, if they go 4-8, the front office may not have much of a choice. Regardless of what happens over the next couple weeks, though, I still think the likeliest outcome is that the Twins end up as sellers.

    If that's the route they take, several names should immediately jump to the top of the trade market. Ryan Jeffers, Josh Bell, Trevor Larnach, and Kody Clemens all make a lot of sense. Larnach, in particular, feels like someone who should be moved regardless of where the Twins are in the standings. Minnesota simply has too many young corner outfielders knocking on the door in Triple-A, and eventually they're going to need everyday opportunities. Beyond that, all four players represent guys who are either in the prime of their careers or short-term pieces that probably aren't going to move the needle much for the Twins beyond this season.

    If those four players are traded, though, the lineup would suddenly look dramatically different. Four of the five hitters that typically occupy the top of Minnesota's lineup would be gone. The Twins would need a new catcher, a new primary left fielder, a designated hitter, and someone capable of filling the many different roles Clemens has handled this season. That creates opportunities for younger players.

    Alan Roden feels like one of the biggest beneficiaries. He has the defensive versatility to play either corner outfield spot, and his offensive production at Triple-A has looked more than deserving of a promotion. This would also be the perfect opportunity to finally see exactly what Aaron Sabato can offer at the major league level. The former first-round pick from the 2020 MLB Draft may never become the Twins' long-term answer at first base (and realistically probably won't), but when a player has produced 35 extra-base hits and a .927 OPS in Triple-A, it's worth finding out if there's something there before completely moving on.

    Catcher probably wouldn't change much immediately. Jeffers is already sidelined with a fractured hamate bone, so the Twins have already begun adjusting behind the plate without him. The biggest winners, however, would likely be the organization's wave of outfield prospects. Assuming he returns healthy, Emmanuel Rodriguez should receive even more opportunities down the stretch if the Twins pivot toward evaluating young talent. Walker Jenkins, Hendry Mendez, and Gabriel Gonzalez could all benefit as well, especially if multiple outfield spots suddenly become available over the final two months of the season.

    Of course, the Twins probably wouldn't stop at trading only four players. Taylor Rogers is another obvious candidate. He's an experienced left-handed reliever, and contenders are always looking to add bullpen help in July. Even Yoendrys Gomez could generate interest despite arriving less than two months ago. The Twins showed at last year's deadline that they aren't afraid to aggressively move relievers, so it wouldn't be surprising to see them take a similar approach again if they decide to sell.

    Then there are the two names everyone always talks about. Byron Buxton and Joe Ryan have been connected to trade rumors for what feels like years now. Buxton's situation is a little different because he owns a no-trade clause. If the Twins agreed to a deal, he would still have the ability to veto it. Ryan doesn't have that luxury. So how far out of the playoff picture would Minnesota need to be before seriously considering moving one of them? Or even both? And if they did, what kind of return could they realistically expect?

    The answer is probably a massive one. Both players have multiple years of team control remaining, both are among the best in baseball at their respective positions, and both would instantly become one of the most sought-after players available at the deadline.

    The Twins wouldn't simply be acquiring prospects in return. A trade involving Ryan or Buxton could realistically bring back major league-ready talent, along with one or more premium prospects capable of impacting the organization's future. I've been pretty vocal about my belief that the Twins should trade Joe Ryan–I don't necessarily feel that same way about Byron Buxton. But there's no denying the type of return either would command. 

    That's what makes the trade deadline so fascinating every single year. It's one of the most exciting times on the baseball calendar. Unfortunately for Twins fans, that excitement probably won't come from adding talent this summer. Instead, there's a very real chance the roster we see today looks nothing like the one we'll be watching just a little over a month from now.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    41 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    I'm not sure your point about Larnach?

    Larnach provides more value to stay as a Twin then he nets in a trade.  Plus his average is in the .280 range with gap power.   Other than Buxton, I think he is extremely valuable for the 2026 team

     

    17 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    You will have to elaborate.  What statistical bias would be present by using a data set comprised of the highest WAR players or in this case generally the 10-12 highest producing players.   I was looking to identify how the highest producing players were acquired.  How could that result in statistical bias. 

    You just spelled out exactly the bias.

    I could point to Ryan Kreidler and Yoendrys Gómez as proof of success for the Twins' bottom-feeding tactics for player acquisition.

    I don't use the term "bias" to imply bad intent.  But when analyzing large sets of data, some care is needed.  It's fine to use a biased data set if you are intrigued by a potential insight, to see whether something might be there. But then you need to validate the conclusion you want to draw by also looking at the contrapositive.

    24 minutes ago, ashbury said:

    You just spelled out exactly the bias.

    I could point to Ryan Kreidler and Yoendrys Gómez as proof of success for the Twins' bottom-feeding tactics for player acquisition.

    I don't use the term "bias" to imply bad intent.  But when analyzing large sets of data, some care is needed.  It's fine to use a biased data set if you are intrigued by a potential insight, to see whether something might be there. But then you need to validate the conclusion you want to draw by also looking at the contrapositive.

    I think you have interpreted the way I approached this to mean the only thing that counts is when an established player is traded for a guy that has no major league experience.  I view Kriedler or Willi Castro the same way at least in the context of this discussion.  When we talk about roster building here, we generally look at through a lens of 4 categories.  1. Drafted by the Organization,  Free Agents, Trading prospects for  established players or Trading established players for unproven players.  There is another category of players like a Kriedler or Wiilli Castro.  I guess I could have created a couple more categories but there just are not enough of those guys to make a couple more categories meaningful.  Conceptually, the way we discuss acquiring players here, they are unproven just like all other prospects so that's where I put them.  If you want to quibble about another category especially for them, OK.  Would that change the percentage of players acquired as free agents or the percentage of production from established players acquired for prospects.?  Of course, the answer is that those categories would not change at all.  The difference is you would have another category of players that were unproven when acquired.  Add all those categories of unproven players up and you have the exact same result.

     

     

    On 6/29/2026 at 7:26 AM, MMBoys93 said:

    They’re still 24th in baseball against winning teams and I can guarantee you that if they make the playoffs they’ll only be playing teams with winning records 

    This seems to always be the twins issue. They feast off weak competition. 2019 they won 101 games, had a record under .500 vs teams with a winning record. Got swept by the Yankees and everyone was somehow shocked.

    The point is if you can’t beat good teams, then buying at the trade deadline seems silly

    You seem worried about records vs winning teams.  Only one team in last year's playoffs was more than 2 games over .500 against winning teams.  No American League playoff team was more than one game over .500 against winning teams.  Even the two time champion Dodgers were under .500  

    Win the games you're supposed to win and let the rest sort itself out.

    On 6/28/2026 at 5:47 PM, DocBauer said:

    I don't necessarily disagree with you. I think I stated they SHOULD resign Ryan, but I'm open to the idea of trading him. I just don't LIKE the idea. 

    I'm TIRED of the idea that "we're not quite there". But of you DON'T once in a while KEEP a TOP player, how do you EVER actually GET THERE?

    Look, if someone offered another TOP SP like Abel, and a TOP Catcher or 2B and another "Varland type" of arm that's ready for a full BP conversion, I could be IN 100%.

    Maybe we extend Lopez instead of Ryan as the leader of the staff. I could see that happening. 

    Again, I'm not OPPOSED to trading Ryan. But I'd rather keep him as a Twin for the next 4 years. I think that makes more sense than looking for the next Ryan. But you give us the next Abel...which I really dispute a contending team would do...and a TOP CATCHER or 2B, and throw in a 23-25yo ARM who has real talent but is Varland Jr just converting, or ready to convert, my mind can change in a hurry.

    That's 2 top 100 prospects ready to debut, and a 3rd who might be the next Varland. Another team offers THAT, I'm on board for a trade.

    Hi Doc:

    I would LOVE to sign Ryan but I am 99% positive that the Twins have already burnt that bridge.  I highly doubt that he would sign an extension with the Twins...or even, let's say, the LAD if he were traded there.  He knows that if he has another year like this one, he will be earning $20-$30 mill on the open market.  I just can't see the Twins matching those offers, so the chances of him signing an extension are pretty much dead.  That said, all the teams know that he is the best SP available for trade (not named Skubal) and has that 2027 year, so yeah, he will bring a pretty good trade haul.  I think this is our reality, sadly.  

    But, we may be at a point where we could get a good deal on an Lopez extension.  I expect he will come back strong and I love him on the team.

    A more challenging question:  do you trust Zoll to make a good trade for Ryan?

     

    On 6/28/2026 at 9:53 PM, Danchat said:

    Trading Larnach should rely on whether they will buy his final season of arbitration, if that's going to be too expensive for them then it's better to trade him at the deadline than let him hit the open market and get nothing for him. 

    It would be absolutely insane for them to not buy Larnach's final year of arbitration. I cannot even imagine that is a discussion right now. He is arguably the second best hitter on the team. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...