Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Adalberto Mejia: High Floor or More?


    Jamie Cameron

    Few moments in life result in genuine anticipation. For me, they are predictable. My wedding day, the birth of my daughter and waiting for a starting pitcher to sign this offseason. In an effort to fill this continually unexciting, and harrowingly stagnant alternate reality in which starting pitchers are no longer required to complete baseball games, I’m taking a stand. I’m going to forget about all the upside that could improve the Twins rotation and focus on what we already have. Namely, Adalberto Mejia.

    Image courtesy of Bruce Kluckhohn-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Mejia ‘hasn’t gotten a ton of ink’ at Twins Daily this offseason. Those are Tom Froemming’s words, I can’t pull that sentence off. The point remains, Mejia can be an afterthought in a Twins rotation resplendent with uncertain back end options. He’s most likely the leading candidate for the fifth starter role in 2018, but should he be?

    The Twins acquired Mejia in a sell-high swap of Eduardo Nunez, traded on the back of an outstanding(ly lucky) first half for Minnesota in 2016. Mejia was one of the Giants’ better thought of prospects (No. 10 according to Baseball Prospectus) in a weaker system. At the time, he was thought of more as having a high floor than high ceiling. After an up and down 2017 season, what does Mejia offer the Twins? And what does he need to do to take a step forward and cement his position as a more consistent back of the rotation starter?

    Let’s start with what Mejia has. He’s a 6-foot-3 lefty, who checks in at 195 lbs. according to FanGraphs (lies!). He relies in a pretty typical four-pitch mix. Mejia throws a four seam fastball (avg. 93 mph), a slider (avg. 84 mph), a changeup (avg. 84 mpg) and a sinker (avg. 92 mph). All four of his pitches have slightly above average velocity, but none of them are going to blow you away.

    Mejia’s mechanics went through some adjustments over the course of the 2017 season. In April (a month in which Mejia struggled significantly) his release point was significantly lower on all four of his pitches than it was by the season’s end. His average fastball started the season with a release point of 6.0 ft. and finished with a release point of 6.31 ft., a significant difference. This ‘straightening up’ allowed Mejia to generate a little more vertical movement on all of his off-speed pitches as the season progressed. The graphs below track Mejia's vertical release point and vertical movement for his four primary pitches throughout the 2017 season.

    ccs-8747-0-10204200-1517714305_thumb.jpeg

    ccs-8747-0-28248300-1517714317_thumb.jpeg

    In spite of this increase in movement, Mejia struggled to generate a consistently strong secondary pitch throughout the 2017 season. Mejia left a few of his sliders over the plate, which, with minimal break on the pitch, led to said few being crushed for home runs. His lack of a strong secondary pitch most impacted his fastball, however, allowing hitters to wait on it and tee off on the pitch to the tune of a .921 OPS. Mejia did split his breaking pitch mix between his slider and a curveball (which he threw around 10 percent of the time). Mejia’s curveball showed promise, registering at season’s end as his only plus pitch.

    If there is one factor in determining whether Mejia can solidify himself as a solid back end option for the Twins, it is his fastball control. Overall, Mejia had an ugly walk rate of 4.04 BB/9 in 2017. Mejia was only able to generate 34 percent ground balls on his fastball. Looking at his heat map for first-pitch fastballs, it’s easy to see why. The heat map below shows the location of Mejia’s fastball when deployed as the first pitch to right-handed hitters. It’s notable that Mejia 1) struggles to find the zone and establish his fastball against RHH, and 2) Mejia leaves a considerable number of the fastballs which do find the strike zone over the middle of the plate.

    ccs-8747-0-17565500-1517714366.gif

    One of the limitations of Mejia’s fastball in 2018 is how eminently hittable it is. This is noticeable in a comparison between Mejia’s fastball and that of Jose Berrios. O-Contact% measures the amount of contact hitters make with a particular pitch when it is thrown outside the strike zone. In 2017, opposing hitters made contact with around 60 percent of Berrios’ fastballs located outside the strike zone. For Mejia the figure was just under 80 percent. Over the course of the season, this equates to around 150 extra fastballs which weren’t in the strike zone getting contacted when comparing Berrios and Mejia.

    When your fastball isn’t a plus pitch, that’s a big deal. Mejia doesn’t have the movement or velocity to blow people away or create much deception in his pitches. In order to be successful, he needs to develop his ability to control his fastball and command it using the strike zone more deliberately.

    Finally, it’s interesting to note exactly when Mejia got himself into his biggest messes on the mound. You might think that a pitcher struggling with control would walk more hitters with men on base, but these situations were actually where Mejia clamped down. His greatest struggles came in low leverage situations in which he had a BB/9 of 5.34, as opposed to 1.29 in high-leverage situations. To put this another way, Mejia had a BB/9 of 5.73 when the bases where empty, as opposed to just 2.67 with men on base.

    Mejia remains an interesting option for the Twins going into the 2018 season. He will remain a bargain, given the price Minnesota paid for him. His 2018 impact is really dependent on two key factors moving forwards: Getting ahead of hitters and improving one of his breaking pitches to offset his fastball more effectively. If Mejia can take steps forward in these areas, the Twins should have a solid No. 5.

    Who do you think is the favorite for the Twins fifth starting pitching roster spot ahead of spring training?

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    But isn't that the case with most systems? It's not as if even the best system has 3-4 #1/2 projectable pitchers in the pipeline.

     

    The Twins are certainly lacking can't-miss, top-end talent but there are intriguing names that might end up mid-rotation or better in the future: Enlow, Thorpe, Romero primarily.

    I was not passing judgement,I was answering a question. Worse for this team, and this is a judgement, one of the good pitchers is in his mid 30s....

    Mejia will never be a good pitcher with his walk rate. If he fixes that, sure, but it's a longstanding problem and it isn't likely to change. 

     

    With a good defense he can be a #3, but most likely he is a #5 with maybe a couple of peak years as a #4.

     

    The Twins signed a #3 but he won't hit the field until 2019 -- Michael Pineda* -- so Mejia is slotting in where he should be for the long term. The Twins have yet to address the short term middle of the rotation.

     

    *Pineda is not a real solution to anything as he will only play one year with the team.

    Edited by Doomtints

     

    Mejia will never be a good pitcher with his walk rate. If he fixes that, sure, but it's a longstanding problem and it isn't likely to change. 

     

    With a good defense he can be a #3, but most likely he is a #5 with maybe a couple of peak years as a #4.

     

    The Twins signed a #3 but he won't hit the field until 2019 -- Michael Pineda* -- so Mejia is slotting in where he should be for the long term. The Twins have yet to address the short term middle of the rotation.

     

    *Pineda is not a real solution to anything as he will only play one year with the team.

    Mejia's walk rate is troublesome but not outlandish (4.0/9 in 2017). Contrast that with a pretty solid rookie year K rate (7.8/9) and it's not hard to see him becoming a productive MLB pitcher, certainly better than a #5 in the rotation.

     

    If he moves both stats in the correct direction half a point, his peripherals suddenly look rather solid. He's not *that* far off the mark.

     

    I understand people being somewhat tepid on Mejia but I don't think he's getting a fair shake a lot of the time. He's coming off a quite solid rookie campaign with peripherals that weren't embarrassing (his peripherals look downright promising compared to Berrios' rookie year). Sure, he has stuff to work on but I'm not ready to relegate him to a #5 starting pitcher quite yet.

     

    Too bad the two guys he passes up in the pecking order don't get the same benefit.

     

    The defensive play Santana got was a bit different from the defensive play some of the other guys got. You gotta be a great guy in the clubhouse to really get peak effort from guys ... that's just reality/human nature.

    The defensive play Santana got was a bit different from the defensive play some of the other guys got.

    That's gotta be Small Sample Size.

     

    Otherwise, you're arguing that, say, Buxton gets an initial read on a long fly ball, says "I might be able to reach that", then thinks twice and says, "nah, that one's on Gibby".

    I think Odorizzi kicks Mejia back to Rochester (hey, somebody had to do it).

     

    I would like to see Mejia pitch into the 8th inning a few times in AAA to show he has the stamina to even get through the 4th or 5th in the bigs. He seems to unravel pretty quickly. I wonder if spin rates remain steady or if they drop off with fatigue or who his swinging strikes were collected from or if he can maintain his release point deep into a game, or, name your question. Lots of great data in this article and still lots of important questions surrounding him. Mejia is a good player to have, just not ready to trust him with a rotation spot. Maybe a spot start against a favorable matchup.

    I think Odorizzi kicks Mejia back to Rochester (hey, somebody had to do it).

     

    I would like to see Mejia pitch into the 8th inning a few times in AAA to show he has the stamina to even get through the 4th or 5th in the bigs. He seems to unravel pretty quickly. I wonder if spin rates remain steady or if they drop off with fatigue or who his swinging strikes were collected from or if he can maintain his release point deep into a game, or, name your question. Lots of great data in this article and still lots of important questions surrounding him. Mejia is a good player to have, just not ready to trust him with a rotation spot. Maybe a spot start against a favorable matchup.

    Not that I disagree that Mejia needs to be able to go deeper in games, but so does Odorizzi. Odorizzi averaged 1 more out per start than Mejia did last year.

     

    I think Odorizzi kicks Mejia back to Rochester (hey, somebody had to do it).

    I would like to see Mejia pitch into the 8th inning a few times in AAA to show he has the stamina to even get through the 4th or 5th in the bigs. He seems to unravel pretty quickly. I wonder if spin rates remain steady or if they drop off with fatigue or who his swinging strikes were collected from or if he can maintain his release point deep into a game, or, name your question. Lots of great data in this article and still lots of important questions surrounding him. Mejia is a good player to have, just not ready to trust him with a rotation spot. Maybe a spot start against a favorable matchup.

     

    With Santana on the DL, I think Mejia will get a shot in the rotation personally. I'm fine with that. There's some pretty unrealistic expectations on this forum if we think that what we saw of Mejia in his rookie year is what we get, and I'd probably say the same again regardless of how he does in 2018. Baring injury, he should improve.

     

    He may not ever be a #1, but if he puts up anything even remotely close to his minor league career rate, then he's pitching like a 2/3 type. His career walk rate is around 2 in the minors. His K rate is a bit lower than I'd like, though from here it looks as though there was something going in in AA (injury I'm guessing but I'm just spitballing based on the number of innings pitched) that likely affected it, as he's been up over 8 per 9 in just about all of his other stops, which included a stint in the PCL (note his major league K rate is already in line with his minor league career numbers). 

     

    With Santana on the DL, I think Mejia will get a shot in the rotation personally. I'm fine with that. There's some pretty unrealistic expectations on this forum if we think that what we saw of Mejia in his rookie year is what we get, and I'd probably say the same again regardless of how he does in 2018. Baring injury, he should improve.

     

    He may not ever be a #1, but if he puts up anything even remotely close to his minor league career rate, then he's pitching like a 2/3 type. His career walk rate is around 2 in the minors. His K rate is a bit lower than I'd like, though from here it looks as though there was something going in in AA (injury I'm guessing but I'm just spitballing based on the number of innings pitched) that likely affected it, as he's been up over 8 per 9 in just about all of his other stops, which included a stint in the PCL (note his major league K rate is already in line with his minor league career numbers). 

    You could be right. I went back to look at Mejia's lines, and he wasn't as bad as I remember, especially in June and July last year he was pretty good. My impression is of Mejia's later starts, always running into trouble and Molitor getting itchy already by the 2nd or 3rd inning. 

     

    ..still a #5-6 starter, imo, but maybe worth a start or two early when Santana is rehabbing

    Edited by Hosken Bombo Disco



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...