I really don’t think it’s fair to lump Kepler with Buxton and Sano. First of all, he’s been in the lineup (i.e. healthy) pretty much everyday. He has an OPS+ over 100 and a bWAR of .8. Sano and Buxton can say all but 3 of those. Kepler’s problem is very much different than Sano or Buxton. Kepler has a career low 16% K rate and a career high 12% BB rate. He is not being overmatched. He has good pitch recognition and plate discipline. Sano has a career worst 40% K rate and career worst 9% BB rate. Buxton has a 32% K rate, which isn’t career worst but is still terrible. Kepler’s line drive % is 24% which is right about his career mark and just a tick below league average (26%). Sano has a 16% line drive rate, about half his career mark coming into 2018. Buxton is at 19%, also a career low. The number that stands out for me is Kepler’s .250 BABIP. He has always run low. His career mark is .265. My thinking is that it is mostly a result of hitting into the shift too predictably. That has to be the next phase of Kepler’s development. Making himself a threat to all fields. Then the shifts go away and his BABIP should normalize. Sano’s BABIP is .303. Buxton’s is an absurdly low .226, but that just shows how bad a place he is in and could be related to the foot issues resulting in extremely weak contact (further evidenced by his LD%). So, very different problem for Kepler. But one I think he can improve. He has made tremendous strides vs lhp, so he clearly is capable of adjusting his approach. Frankly, neither Buxton or Sano have proven they can adjust yet. They have gotten where they are largely with natural ability.