Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    25,138

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    126

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by nicksaviking

  1. nicksaviking
    It would not be more interesting, unless you find toxicity interesting , in which case, you’re on the wrong website. And it would take truly clueless leadership to throw the goodwill earned from this signing out the window. You’d lose the clubhouse and you’d anger all but a small, and very specific and unfortunately overly vocal demographic of your fan base.
  2. nicksaviking
    I can't imagine the MLBPA would have stood for the annual physical clause. You open that door, and teams will push for it on EVERY contract. The Mets deal was dead in the water if they were insisting on that.
  3. nicksaviking
    Kind of a weird choice for the Twins. It's basically a no risk deal so it's fine with me, but while I'd like him to go directly to the pen, I bet they stick with him as a starter since he has an option year and the AAA rotation is pretty bare of options. They have Varland, SWR and Balazovic. Maybe Winder, but my guess is he'll get a long look for the MLB pen. Sands and Henriquez are certainly being looked at as relievers at this point, competing with Winder for a BP role perhaps. But his issue with control is the real head-scratcher. The Twins used to go all in on these kinds of arms thinking they could change them. That seemed to stop a few years back though. They seemed to make a concerted effort about it too.
  4. nicksaviking
    Re-reading the AP article, the vesting options AREN'T all at 502 PA, 502 is the final vesting year. https://apnews.com/article/carlos-correa-twins-mets-giants-anke-physical-9bfbe5088907863eb3a604ae3cca6307 The first vesting year is at 575 PA, which is far from a given. This contradicts another source that used to be linked on MLBTR so it could be wrong. One of those sources also said the there were team options as well.
  5. nicksaviking
    Kepler is a free agent in two years and the Marlins are non-competitive in the the league's best division. I just don't see them having any interest in him since they aren't contending for anything. They'll want young position players. And probably young pitchers too. Everybody wants young pitchers, especially if they're trading pitching.
  6. nicksaviking
    I don't remember who had the original details, but I'm pretty sure it was 502 PA. But I also saw that it's not only vesting options, but team options as well. So if Correa is still playing well but has a fluke injury keeping him from 502 PA, the ball's still in the Twins court. Like most, I'm sure MLBTR is a go to refresh page for this kind of news. I don't like when they restructure the initial reports into an article removing the old links and minor updates once that article is ready to go up. Then I lose most of the sources like to the things I 'think' I remember reading above.
  7. nicksaviking
    Why single out the Mets in particular then? No other team was willing to beat MN's AAV. Not now, nor with the initial offers. I mean, the Mets were offering 26M per year, the first year of his deal with the Twins is 36M. That's a pretty significant jump.
  8. nicksaviking
    36M the first three years then 31-30M the years after. The Twins have really structured this contract well. Most teams try to structure them to make the payouts higher at the end (let's earn some interest!!!!!), but clearly the front loaded deal works for the Twins current payroll situation best. That's a great sign that to them, doing this deal right is worth more than doing it economically.
  9. nicksaviking
    AAV. Their highest yearly offer was only 26.25M. Even the offer the Twins made, which we all knew was subpar overall, was 28M. Once they had injury concerns, naturally it was the length of the deal that the Mets wanted to cut down, the initial salary they were offering probably wasn't the issue to them.
  10. nicksaviking
    I don't think Miami would have any interest in Kepler. They have two 100 win teams in their division in addition to the World Series champs. Kepler will be long gone before that team is ready to compete.
  11. nicksaviking
    The vesting options are all based on 502 PA the previous season. https://apnews.com/article/new-york-mets-minnesota-twins-san-francisco-giants-mlb-sports-9bfbe5088907863eb3a604ae3cca6307 That's pretty fantastic in my book. The Twins pretty much get to call the shots.
  12. nicksaviking
    I think Miami would prefer younger players. Maybe ONE of those three vets along with younger players.
  13. nicksaviking
    AK and Larnach are corner players and oft injured ones at that. If they're lucky enough to get an extension, they'd likely only get a Kepler/Sano kind of deal. Lewis, Lee and Miranda are still years away from free agency. They certainly COULD extend them now, but if they did, the players would be taking a discount, if they wait to extend them (assuming any end up being worthy) the bulk of their extensions won't bump up against Correa's commitment. You'd likely only have a year or two where it gets tight.
  14. nicksaviking
    I understand where you're coming from. I just hope the front office doesn't actually think Kepler is a key cog in this system.
  15. nicksaviking
    We agree on a lot, but not this one. Seems more likely they'll be interested in getting his salary off the books now. And personally, I don't want both him and Gallo manning the corners. I don't want Miranda to be the only young upside player in the lineup, I really want to make room for the young bats.
  16. nicksaviking
    This is nuts, and I'm all for it. I bet this worked out due to the pretty crazy AAV of those first six years. The Mets and other big clubs liked those long term deals to stretch out the payments, but the Twins did have one thing going for them in that they had next to no payroll commitments for the next several years. The high AAV upfront worked out for them.
  17. nicksaviking
    Ugh, looking at that list, "Top" free agents is obviously a relative term.
  18. nicksaviking
    Most outlets suggest the Twins salary goal could or should be about 160M this year even if only to pump up their upcoming broadcast rights negotiations. 10 years from now, the payroll should be closer to 200M, than it is to 150M. Whether it works out or not, whatever deal Correa signs now, will be yawned at by 2028. Heck, 10 years from now, payroll might be well north of 200M because revenue sharing and salary caps/floors are likely the only way the league will survive. The sport's going to be dead if there continues to be a 1000% difference between the top spending club and the bottom spending club.
  19. nicksaviking
    While certainly jealous, I didn’t begrudge the Mets and their new owner and his crazy spending. This is totally unacceptable and unprofessional though. The Mets KNEW the Giants had medical concerns and still offered that deal. Now they want to renegotiate? Fine, they can ask, but spare us the dramatics. They have zero right to be indignant and passive aggressive. And if they think passive aggressiveness is going to get the job done, ha, good luck! Upper Midwesterners are the kings of passive aggressiveness. You’re playing on our turf now.
  20. nicksaviking
    Agrees to terms between those hours. His signing hours are TBD. Funny thing will be, if he does change course back to MN, based on the last two months, no one will believe it to be true until ink is on the paper.
  21. nicksaviking
    Hendricks pitched three seasons for the Twins. Their foolishness stemmed from not trying him in the pen before cutting him loose. Looks like the Twins did start that with Enlow last year, but he was still in AA ball, and not doing well. I'm not terribly worried about him becoming great. I'll also be a dissenter in saying that I think the odds of him getting claimed are less than 50%. The bloom has been off of his rose since 2019.
  22. nicksaviking
    The Twins paid Joe Mauer 23m per year over a decade ago. It seemed scary. 28M twelve years later should be easy to stomach considering how inflation has hit the rest of the league. And I’m not scared of the injury stuff. Has a MLB player retired due to arthritis since Sandy Koufax?
  23. nicksaviking
    I don’t know about best, maybe capable. If they land him, seems more like they foolishly went all in on a straight draw and were lucky enough to hit it on the river.
  24. nicksaviking
    Well two of the last three off seasons, in early December the Twins walked into their offices, which were fully ablaze and surrounded by an angry mob. They then exited the offices the following calendar year, somehow unscathed and holding a baby dragon as a shocking new prize.
  25. nicksaviking
    The Mets have ZERO reason to be frustrated. They jumped in with an offer knowing full well the Giants had concerns. What are they frustrated about? The player not compromising?!? Why would he when the team ALREADY knew there was an issue yet offered and agreed to terms with him? Only team that should be frustrated is the Giants, who got stood up after 12 hours, not one month like the Mets got.
×
×
  • Create New...