Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    25,644

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    126

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by nicksaviking

  1. nicksaviking
    Presuming Tait is still a higher valued prospect than Diaw, I'd look to trade Tait first. If I had to pick one stat to make an educated guess on a hitting prospect, it would be OBP and Diaw has gotten on base at an elite clip at every level. But I'm not trading anybody of note for rental players.
  2. nicksaviking
    If you're a Tigers fan, it's hard not to like the return for a rental, even if it's the best rental in the league. As a Twins fan, I don't want Hope and Ryan in the Tigers system. The Mets got nothing back because they traded away a guy who apparently can only pitch well while wearing a Brewers uniform.
  3. nicksaviking
    If this team is trading for rentals, the rentals should be salary dumps with minimal player equity going back. Like the Minter deal. Trading Larnch is fine, but trade him, in a package perhaps, for someone who’ll be here beyond 2026.
  4. nicksaviking
    Yeah the prospects need to be up getting reps, but that could be done by trading/DFAing/demoting Bell, Gray, Martin, Kriedler and/or Roden. But trading for more relievers blocks Raya, Culpepper, Matthews from getting needed reps too.
  5. nicksaviking
    I get trading Larnach, but why for a rental? I’m starting to become gravely concerned this team cares most about making a token playoff appearance this year and has no eyes on being a legit contender next year and beyond.
  6. nicksaviking
    Right. Instead of raising the ceiling, which without question is what real contenders do.
  7. nicksaviking
    Yeah, this looks like a move just to make a move. This is a guy who would/should be left off of a playoff roster. Why wouldn’t you want Rojas getting those starts instead? Kind of a symptom of post Correa Twins roster building though. Competitive teams add to the top of the roster. The last two years the Twins have primarily only tried to add to the bottom of the roster. Which is basically just DFA candidates.
  8. nicksaviking
    I mean, if it’s me, Rojas is in the rotation over Matthews and the new guy, and Rogers is either DFA’d or invited to enjoy the games from the press box.
  9. nicksaviking
    I just don't think ERA means a whole lot for pitchers moving from team to team. And definitely not wins. Don't get me started on WAR. Gausman's strikeout numbers and walk numbers are still really, really good, and much superior to Ray, and those should be much more translatable skills. Ray's strikeouts are way down this year and he's actually leading the NL in walks. To me his other numbers look like a fluke and he's quite possibly about to walk off a cliff. Oracle Park does tend to make pitchers look good.
  10. nicksaviking
    I'd say no to May and Singer as they're ground ball specialists and the Twins infield, uh, isn't. I could do Ray, but if the team is eating salary to prove a point, give me Kevin Gausman and his strikeouts.
  11. nicksaviking
    I have to say, the apostrophes (note: not quotation marks) around 'Having Nightmares' almost makes it sound like someone from the Twins provided that statement on the record and not Bob Nightengale. In any case, it wasn't a good trade. But I am still pretty excited about Rojas. Tons of the Twins previous 'bad trades' had next to no redeeming values, but there's a good chance that even if they 'lose' this one, it won't be a complete bust.
  12. nicksaviking
    As far as I know, that only matters when it comes to ROY voting these days.
  13. nicksaviking
    I mean, obviously their track record says they are undefeated at being right...........
  14. nicksaviking
    It's not exactly a concrete reference source, but when Max Clark was called up the other day, MLBTR said he had no chance at accruing a year of service time at this point of the year. https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2026/07/tigers-call-up-max-clark-top-prospect.html
  15. nicksaviking
    Don't get me wrong, I don't want to sell either. I want to retain Ryan and Jeffers, even if only through 2027. I also want to make sure any needed key young players in 2027 are getting the experience and reps needed. Winning games in 2026 is a bonus and I hope they continue to do so.
  16. nicksaviking
    Yeah, the velocity and the ensuing strikeouts are the biggest question mark for sure. I do like the track record over two teams and how infrequently he hands out free passes though.
  17. nicksaviking
    Minter actually has reverse splits this year giving a .810 OPS against left handed hitters. Presuming the Twins were paying attention before they traded for him, it's possible he wasn't brought in to be a typical left handed specialist.
  18. nicksaviking
    Well, that's likely because our priorities are slightly different; like a year off. Which is also OK. I'm really happy the team is playing competent ball this year, and I don't want to take that excitement away from anyone. It's just that my belief is if they play their cards right, next year could be the real deal; and maybe for a good long stretch.
  19. nicksaviking
    Raya, Culpepper, Klein (Matthews). I'm good giving Anderson a longer look too.
  20. nicksaviking
    Yeah, that's where I am. **If they felt they had to get a bullpen arm, I presumed it would be a strikeout artist for late game scenarios. This is fine, and I'm definitely not in any way mad about it, but it's not what I thought was needed. Don't care about the prospects, but I don't need more bullpen moves after this, because I do care about the roster spots and getting innings to the young relievers who still need to continue adjusting to relief work. That's who this team has to count on next year and the foreseeable future. Possible bonus though, as he's a lefty, perhaps the Twins would then swap out Matthews for Rojas in the rotation. That's where both should be in 2027.
  21. nicksaviking
    I think it's the nature of other team's relievers. I think when they're already in house and have been here a year or so, you have a significantly better idea of when, how and if to use them.
  22. nicksaviking
    That was a terrible time for a team meeting. What did I miss?
  23. nicksaviking
    Have they decided it's best for Jenkins? Or best to keep his future earnings low? Because I can tell what's not incomplete, his low strikeout and high walk rates, which are almost always the things that holds a AAA player back.
  24. nicksaviking
    I'd take either a salary dump starter or even a low level waiver starter to get Matthews to the pen, which is where I think he belongs. That's not to be demeaning at all, because I think Matthews is going to thrive there as soon as he gets used to the transition.
  25. nicksaviking
    Don't we want the Twins to be in that boat? I don't think they've done pre-arb extensions with ANYONE since Kepler and Polanco, let alone 1st year contract extensions.
×
×
  • Create New...