Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    25,395

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    126

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by nicksaviking

  1. nicksaviking
    Man, Texas had the best offense in the AL last year; .790 OPS. This year they only have two players who can top that mark and it's almost exactly the same offensive roster. Those bats got old fast. And yes, I realized I probably just jinxed the Twins by posting this.
  2. nicksaviking
    May, Duffey, Perkins, Nathan, Hawkins, Aguilera. Duran, Alcala, Rogers and Presley were all questionable starters until right when they got called up. Still baffling that the Twins didn't have the foresight to do it with Liam Hendricks before they had to cut him loose.
  3. nicksaviking
    OK, so if they were willing to spend 700K on a bad reliever, stands to reason they may be able to be talked into spending 700K on a not bad reliever. But again, I'm in agreement, Texas is unlikely to do this, and if they should, the players are unlikely to make it to the Twins.
  4. nicksaviking
    I'm not disagreeing that the Pohald's aren't the ones standing in the way of improving the club, but Trevor Richards isn't playing for free. They did add 1M or whatever in payroll to add him, which is as much or more than the last three relievers listed. Stands to reason if they didn't say no to Richards, it's possible they wouldn't say no to: RHRP José Léclerc - $1M - 0.3 fWAR LHRP Kirby Yates - $0.7M - 1.6 fWAR LHRP Andrew Chafin - $0.7M - 0.3 fWAR
  5. nicksaviking
    Bad look for sure. Especially since Seattle and Houston are two teams who ARE in position to grab these guys. No way in hell Texas wants either of those teams to win a championship with one of these guys.
  6. nicksaviking
    Yeah, I get it, but the Twins are paying Richards more than the last three relievers on the list will cost. But agree with everyone else; they'll never make it to the Twins. The only hope is that no team is going to want to claim and accidentally get three starters and four relievers, so someone goes unclaimed by the lower teams because they all claimed the same few guys. Which means the Twins would need to bid on the worst of the bunch.
  7. nicksaviking
    Your Honor, allow me to introduce exhibit A: Carter administration baby.
  8. nicksaviking
    A rusty 44-year-old Rich Hill wasn't implausible enough?
  9. nicksaviking
    I'll take Baltimore over Houston, even if Baltimore is a better team. The Twins clearly have a post season mental hurdle with Houston (and obviously NY), meanwhile the talented Baltimore squad put up no fight against Texas last year. I think there's a reasonable chance that they end up like Milwaukee and TB (and the Twins), regularly having a really good team but crapping the bed early in the playoffs.
  10. nicksaviking
    You risk alienating all the Trevor Richard fans on this site.
  11. nicksaviking
    I'm fine sticking him in St. Paul from now until he turns 80, but will he even sign with the Twins without a guaranteed contract?
  12. nicksaviking
    Things are going well today......
  13. nicksaviking
    Well than this might be a controversial take and I'll await the barrage of thumbs downs: If Duran can't be used in situations other than closing games, I probably look to move him in the off season. Flexibility leads to efficiency and a thrifty club is going to need efficiency to be most effective.
  14. nicksaviking
    Well she was the National Guard for a bit so I'm giving her a pass on that one.
  15. nicksaviking
    I'd say most posters are objective about Rocco and will criticize or congratulate him as they see fit. But there are far more posters who wouldn't give Rocco credit for saving kids from a burning orphanage than there are who will excuse every move he makes.
  16. nicksaviking
    I get where all this is coming from, but is Duran really someone this team needs to save for the big innings? Seems to me Jax is far and away the team's best reliever this year, and there is easily a case to waste Duran over Alcala and Sands.
  17. nicksaviking
    Agreed. I was excited seeing his prospect ranking when the Twins traded Berrios for him, but that lasted about 30 seconds after I looked at his stats. This type of hitter has no margin for error.
  18. nicksaviking
    I could be talked into a six man rotation to shorten the innings workload of the young arms, but only if Rich Hill AND BALDELLI understand that his seniority buys him absolutely nothing. But if that's the path, is a rusty Rich Hill really any better of an option than Randy Dobnak, whom I also have no interest in?
  19. nicksaviking
    I'm willing to give Kiersey a shot. Can't be worse than Martin.
  20. nicksaviking
    Great. It really wasn't going to bother me if Darnold started most of the year, but now McCarthy won't get any reps and everyone will be putting up question marks about him next year.
  21. nicksaviking
    If we're talking a 6 man rotation, then fine, they can add Hill over Varland. But I don't have interest if the goal is simply to nail down a playoff spot just to be happy to be invited as an underdog. That plan hasn't worked for this franchise in 40 years. The goal needs to be to roster the highest upside players so this team is one of the favorites should they get to the post season. I'll take aiming for the top with the downside of missing the playoffs over accepting a no-chance-in-hell early round exit.
  22. nicksaviking
    That's why I picked 10 days.
  23. nicksaviking
    Good news. But if he's at all gimpy, I sit him 10 days anyway.
  24. nicksaviking
    If the goal is to win a championship, it's too late in the year to bench potential for safety. This is an April move, not a mid August move. The team made their bed in the offseason, it's time to lie in it.
  25. nicksaviking
    My question with these takes is why would you assume Rich Hill will be better than what's currently available? Just because he's a veteran? Here's how I see it. Do I want Hill (or Paddock) starting on the mound in an elimination game in the playoffs? Hell no. Do I want Matthews or Festa on the mound? Probably not. But at least there's a probably in there. They have a month and a half to change my mind; if you stick them in AAA and go with Hill, that option is off the table.
×
×
  • Create New...