I don't disagree with the crowd that says that a manager is only as good as his players. I also agree that the manager is overrated - not unimportant, just overrated. However, how a manager uses those players can make a meaningful impact in a game and over the course of a season. Molitors refusal to platoon players, poor bullpen management, suspect in-game decision making and an overall failure to put players in a position to succeed continue to be issues for me. A good manager, even with a poor roster, can still do all of those things and squeeze every ounce of blood from the turnip. I still think Molitor costs this team more wins than he earns them. Just because a roster isn't full of talent, that isn't a reason to keep a poor manager on. I'd like to see the new FO have their choice in skipper as well.