No one seems to be logically disputing John's basic thesis that Ryan should have rolled the dice by giving Liriano another start. If Liriano pitched a bad game, then the downside would be not getting two C level prospects (or maybe getting only one of them). But if Liriano could have a good game, then maybe the Twins might have received a B or B+ prospect from someone, preferably not the White Sox. Also, there is a fundamental difference between Liriano and Blackburn, which is that Liriano can be virtually unhittable when he has his act together. Liriano has a very high upside. And I suspect that no one approached the Twins wanting Blackburn. One thing that I like about this thread is that we will eventually KNOW who was correct. If Liriano pitches well tonight and thereafter, then there will be vindication for those who did not like the trade. But if Liriano stinks tonight and thereafter, then there will be vindication for those who are happy about trading him to an arch rival for seemingly mediocre prospects. For the record, I would rather have let him have tonight's start. If he stunk, then I would have rather run him through waivers in August than trading him for two bags of balls. By August there could be some pretty hungry teams out there and even if he could not clear waivers enough to get a decent prospect, this would not be much worse than relieving the hated White Sox of two of their weaker prospects.