Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Vanimal46

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    26,054
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    116

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Vanimal46

  1. Teams not trying to win: KC CHI DET BAL TOR SEA TEX MIA CIN PIT SF SD ARI And others will join the group later this year. Maybe even the Twins!
  2. If people think there are too many good teams ahead of the Twins, I hate to break it to them... There are more teams ahead of them in prime position to lose 100 games.
  3. I bet he won't take a 1 year deal, so the Twins are out.
  4. Recruiting class ranked #34 nationally. 8th in the Big 10.
  5. Another blow for FB... But frankly, it doesn't really bother me. If the service is free, you're the product. I accept it.
  6. Don't have time to do the research. I'm sure there are players like Odorizzi every off-season with a track record similar to his. Willingness to sign for cheap or reasonable terms is just your opinion, man. Unless you have inside info?
  7. 13 free agent pitchers with 2+ fWAR this year. And it's not a deep SP class.
  8. I'd love a multi year commitment, but not for pitchers like Odorizzi. I concur 100% with you that pitchers like Odorizzi are available every season. No reason to lock him in. Totally separate note that you didn't comment about... I don't buy Odorizzi as a solid sell candidate either. The Twins gave up very little to get him for 2 years. Why would anyone give the Twins value for less than 1 year of Odorizzi?
  9. I don't think a player will play for the Twins long enough to have this conversation anymore. Not in this risk-averse sport.
  10. I don't buy it; but will thoroughly enjoy the crow I'll eat if he takes the next step offensively.
  11. Now you understand fully... Welcome aboard!
  12. Concur. Sounds like it's doubling down on the one thing we all agreed Molitor did poorly - over using his good relievers to the point where they broke down in 2 months.
  13. Bucholz and Pomeranz does nothing for me. The Twins have no shortage of back end rotation pitchers. Try aiming for a player who can slot into #2/3, or (gasp!) #1 in the rotation.
  14. I classified Stewart and Jay as misses because the goal wasn't to find a potential back-end starter and middle inning reliever picking at #4 and #6 overall. The Twins need a lot more bang for their buck from the draft and that's not going to cut it. If Buxton and Gordon become the starting CF and SS, hey, at least they got 50% right. Chicago Cubs nailed 4 top 10 picks in a row from 2011-2015... Baez, Almora Jr. (who took the longest to develop), Bryant, Schwarber, Happ. Houston nailed, let's say 4 out of 6 top 10 picks from 2011-2015. Springer, Correa, Bregman, Kyle Tucker. Their missed being Appel, and Aiken who never signed with them in 2014. Because of their resounding success tearing down the MLB team and drafting incredibly well, now everyone thinks that's the way to do things. It's not as easy as it looks.
  15. It also illustrates how impressive, and lucky the Cubs and Astros were in their rebuild. Everyone points to their plan as the gold standard, but don't realize how difficult it is to hit on 4 top 5-10 draft picks in a row. The Twins have missed on 50% of their recent top 10 picks with Stewart and Jay. Jury is still out on Buxton and Gordon.
  16. Sounds like they're willing to trade Puig. I'd be in on that.
  17. I don't know why this is necessary. Being a college football coach is the best gig ever. Anytime you have less than 4 years left on your contract, the instant excuse comes into play. "How can I recruit if I can't say I'll be here the whole time they're in the program?"
  18. Correct. There is no confusion what the vision is. It's been the same vision since 2015 when Buxton and Sano were called up. Problem is, there are plenty of concerns whether the Twins are building around players who won't take this organization to the next level.
  19. This sums up my thoughts on the subject.
  20. If they sign or acquire new players via trade, then the Twins have new players to add to the core moving forward if the others fail. I have a feeling we're going to look back on the Button/Sano era and remember one thing "Wait and see".
  21. They can stand pat if they want. I don't know how this generates any excitement for the team or desire to buy tickets. Apathy has already set in for a lot of fans.
  22. Are you advocating to never sign a multi year contract again?
  23. You're preaching to the choir. I've wanted this regime to be bold the last 2 off-seasons. Hence why I have no hesitations packaging Kepler with top prospects to acquire a difference maker. You can find my interest and desire in most any rumors thread for top end pitching.
  24. I was the youngest brother and my older brother obviously needed someone to shoot on in the basement!
  25. Nice to meet a few fellow goalies! No wonder why we get along... We're all crazy enough to willingly let someone shoot a puck as hard as they can against us!
×
×
  • Create New...