In 2016, one of the big reasons why Howard won MVP over Pujols was because he had 149 RBI and Pujols had 137. Howard hit .256/.426/.518 with RISP. Pujols hit .397/.535/..802 with RISP. So who performed better with RISP? The guy with more RBI or the guy with 12 less RBI? Could it be that the 53 more PA with RISP helped Howard get more RBI? Andruw jones almost won MVP when he led the league in RBI with a whopping 128. He batted .207/.335/.386 with RISP. Look at those numbers, but he led the league in RBI. Maybe having 230 PA with RISP helped. Boston leads the majors in OBP. They lead in OBP by a lot in the AL. Their players have way more opportunities for RBI due to having runners on a bunch. It's not that RBI is worthless, just as a standalone stat with no other info it doesn't really tell us whether or not the guy really does well with RISP or not. But Terry Ryan loves the RBI stat, so it must mean a lot.