Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

jimmer

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    10,027

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by jimmer

  1. jimmer
    In any event, all of this is moot. No chance at all we'd get Tulo.
  2. jimmer
    They already hurt their short term goals by shoving May in the bullpen.
  3. jimmer
    I'll be shocked if he ever shows the skills to be a true #2.
  4. jimmer
    Tulo is an actual proven top notch player, and has been for a decade, The 'young' Gibson (who will be 28 going into the offseason) hasn't shown himself to be anything more than average at best.
  5. jimmer
    When we start talking about Tulo being an older player, does it matter that Tulo is only three years older than Gibson? And that he's actually a proven top notch player for a decade as opposed to a pitcher who hasn't shown himself to be anything more than average at best?
  6. jimmer
    I see absolutely nothing special about Gibson at all. He turns 28 this year, not 22 or 23. He is what he is at this point and it's nothing special at all. If HE is going to be the centerpiece of this rotation for year to come, we are boned.
  7. jimmer
    people seem thrilled with Gibson too. some things make no sense.
  8. jimmer
    How has Hanley looked this year? Tulo has an AWAY OPS over .819 this year, and Tulo's away OPS has been heavily affected by NL West parks, as I've shown. Additionally, he can still play shortstop, which Ramirez can't. Ramirez can't play anywhere and to say he was a below average shortstop when he did play there would be generous. It would give him too much credit. So we'd still need a shortstop. Career wRC+ of 125 for Tulo and 131 for Hanley. One has been a quality defender most of his career, they other, yeah, not so much. Tulo has been and is still a much better player.
  9. jimmer
    I don't know any Escobar Tulowitzki who plays for the Rockies so I don't think we should trade for him :-)
  10. jimmer
    Almost half of Tulo's away games have been played in NL West parks (247 of his 521 away games played) and he has, roughly, a .765 OPS combined in those parks. His overall Away OPS is .819. That makes his OPS at those four parks almost 55 points lower than his overall AWAY OPS. That means away from the four NL West parks he plays away games in, he's roughly 55 points higher than his overall AWAY OPS...around .870. Or, to look at it another way, around 100 point swing in OPS. Tulo's AWAY OPS is greatly affected by the amount of away games played in the NL West because almost half of his away games have been played in those parks, and in those parks he has a combined OPS in the .760s. It seriously drags down the overall AWAY OPS to .819. BTW, career wRC+ Home 131, Away 119. Not such a huge difference. Most players do better at home.
  11. jimmer
    Was there anywhere in my posts to suggest Coors didn't have an effect?
  12. jimmer
    If the Twins offered just Gibson for Tulo, the laughing from the Rockies front office (and around baseball if others found out), could be heard to the far reaches of the world.
  13. jimmer
    Yeah, you're mixing the very few star type players the Rockies have had with the plethora of scrubs they've had mixed in with the few stars. Tulo's away numbers as a shortstop are top of the line. And he's had to play a bunch of his away games in decidedly pitcher's parks. He would have seen a drop of his career slashline if he played somewhere else, for sure, but he still would have been the best hitting shortstop in baseball over that time.
  14. jimmer
    I'm not worried about the BA stat, so yeah, Coors inflates that. That's good. I'm saying if we think Tulo would have been some average overall hitting shortstop if he didn't play half his games at Coors, which the post I was responding to seemed to suggest, then I think that's very untrue.
  15. jimmer
    We know what Tulo is, we are guessing what those three will be. This team, and it's fans, have a history of over-rating our prospects by a sizable amount. I often wonder how many quality players we have missed out on over the years as our team hoarded prospects that turned out to be extremely disappointing.
  16. jimmer
    His career away OPS is .813. An .813 OPS from a quality defender at the shortstop position is special (and this is the FIRST season he hasn't shown good skills there. One season is not a trend).There are only two qualifying shortstops who have an OPS of .813 or better this season and he is one of them (with the best one by far). People said the same thing about Holliday when he left Coors. Ooops. People think it's only about leaving Coors, but it's also about playing a ton of games in parks like Petco, Dodger Stadium and AT&T. Not exactly hitters parks over the course of his career and not to mention against quality pitching staffs from those teams to boot on a regular basis.Tulo is a great hitter, period. And he's a leader, he has the intangibles too while still being a great player. Even if he played 120 games a season, 120 games of him and 42 from others still makes the best shortstop situation. At least for another couple years until Correa takes his belt.
  17. jimmer
    true.
  18. jimmer
    I'm still liking my preseason AL MVP pick of Donaldson.
  19. jimmer
    Tulo for Polanco,May and Rosario? Sign me up. Rockies would never take such a small haul.
  20. jimmer
    Getting Tulo would be awesome. And smart.
  21. jimmer
    sorry you are having a hard time following the conversation you and i were having which, in the case of this particular conversation, started with this quote from you, 'I imagine the Twins prefer he wasn't in the pen. So yes.' to which I responded, 'if they preferred he wasn't in the pen, he wouldn't be in the pen.' and the discussion went from there (as we follow the quotes each of us responded to). Then you said, 'Clearly not. I suppose they could have sent him back to AAA.' I said, 'May didn't have to be the one sent to the pen.' you said 'On this I agree. Still has nothing to do with last night.' then I said, 'no, but it does have to do with whether or not the Twins want him in the pen...' Which tied it back to when you said, at the beginning, ''I imagine the Twins prefer he wasn't in the pen'
  22. jimmer
    no, but it does have to do with whether or not the Twins want him in the pen....
  23. jimmer
    May didn't have to be the one sent to the pen.
  24. jimmer
    then 'perhaps the best way for Yost to avoid accusations of team favoritism.' was to not put Moustakis on the ballot to begin with....
  25. jimmer
    if they preferred he wasn't in the pen, he wouldn't be in the pen.
×
×
  • Create New...