Since some people still seem to be confused why the debate CAN be Santana or Arcia without it being a mess up of roster construction: Santana doesn't just play CF.He's plays corners too. And he's playing OF not IF. If Santana was gone instead of Arcia, all that would mean is that Buxton and Kepler would be 1-2 for CF with Arcia taking a corner spot when he played (or LH DH). So, instead of Buxton, Santana, Kepler and Grossman, it'd be Buxton, Arcia, Kepler and Grossman.Leaves two people who can play CF and 4 OF who can play corner (with Rosario eventually, who can also play all 3 spots) It's not that hard to figure out why people are asking why are we keeping Santana over Arcia. Especially since only one would be a good option for pinch hitting and that's not Santana.