How do you KNOW they aren't crediting him properly for what he does well? Maybe they are crediting him properly for what he does well but that doesn't outweigh the things he doesn't. Should they only take into account what he does well and ignore the rest? In any event, you have more than clearly stated your belief the metrics are terrible at evaluations. Unfortunately, you state your belief as fact without providing any alternative form of unbias evaluation to back up your opinion. You believe he's a good, or better, defender than he is and since the metrics disagree it must be the metrics that are wrong or are missing something. So while I truly respect your opinion, in my opinion (even without the metrics) I see a bad defender and the metrics, made by people who evaluate defense for a living, back up what my eyes have told me. I never said he was done or that he was garbage. Being between a role player and a solid starter does not demonstrate done or garbage. IMO, he won't be a difference maker though, not when taking into account his overall game. He will likely be overpaid though, for what he provides.