I said this in my original post, but I'm not sure I said it clearly enough. There were only 3 good signings that the Twins could have reasonably acquired. One of those three they attempted and failed to acquire (Liriano), and I'd argue that this board would have been mostly up in arms about it. I'd also argue that I doubt he has as good of a season as he's having right now if he's still here. The second no one wanted because of his age (Colon) and there were also biogenesis concerns with him if I remember correctly. The third (Santana) was really expensive and would have taken up pretty much all of the budget. The Twins didn't have one spot to fill, they had 3 or 4. They did take a gamble on Worley, and I think that was a wise move. It hasn't panned out this far, but given his minor league track record and two seasons with the Phillies, it was a reasonable gamble, and a far better chance of success than many of the other signings we championed around here. Harden wasn't a bad option either given that it was a 50k minor league deal. The remaining FA options have all faired from mediocre to horrible. Very few of them would have amounted to more than a couple of wins for this team. I wasn't terribly happy about Ryan's free agent acquisitions, but look at this in hind sight, he did a pretty good job. I don't think it's fair to look at the 3 good guys and saying "you should have gotten them", when there were 30 some guys that we were quite glad we didn't get.