I guess this is eye of the beholder stuff. Last year, they beat the Saints twice, knocked Rodgers out for the year, held Atlanta to 9 points and made Julio Jones a non-factor, held the Rams to 7 points, and were the #1 defense by pretty much every measure and #1 historically in some measurements. That seems like they were pretty dominant. You want to throw that out b/c they got blown out in Philly, fine. But not everyone will agree with you. They weren't quite as good this year but the defense still kept the team in a lot of games, especially after the offense imploded in the second half of the year. All those three and outs by the offense were huge - opposing teams dominated time of possession. The Vikings lost TOP in 6 of the last 8 games. In any event, the defense isn't the problem and I'm perfectly fine with Zimmer's defensive scheming. If the Vikings had a credible OL, I suspect a lot of these complaints would be smoothed over. That said, they weren't perfect. They need to get more turnovers on defense. Richardson was pretty run down by the end of the year and not all that effective (I'm not convinced the Vikings won't draft a big DT in the first round and address the OL later in this draft). Kendricks and Barr can be beaten in coverage by fast RBs.