Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

USAFChief

Twins Daily Contributor
  • Posts

    35,928
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    578

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by USAFChief

  1. if Austin finishes with five years in the big leagues I'll buy you a beer.
  2. I've filed a motion to have my grandson's name legally changed to La Tortuga. What stage am I?
  3. Cruz is such a massive upgrade in the middle of the order. Many people these days pooh pooh RBI. Not me. They win ballgames, and he's good at em.
  4. In any case, 2 of 3 to start the year, against Clevelands top 3 starters, is acceptable.
  5. I think that baserunning mistake was on Buxton. It was hard to tell, but I'm pretty sure Astudillo got the stop sign from the third base coach, then the coach started frantically windmilling when he saw Buxton charge around second.
  6. Wasn't Baldelli just raving about Cruz's baserunning ("secondary lead") aiding in a run scoring, after a spring game? He's not fast, but maybe he's a good baserunner. Also, I agree with the above poster...I wouldn't take his bat out of the lineup in a 0-0 game. That's something Gardenhire would do...
  7. Shoulda' bet on that. Opening day happened, and it seems like those were pretty long odds of it being cancelled.
  8. Ignoring the fact Spycake has proven your claim about Houston's payroll to be false...what, pray tell, does Houston's payroll have to do with the Twins, and/or the Pressly trade??
  9. if you're playing a guy every day who cant hit, your problem is the guy who cant hit, not the DH. The guy who cant hit would be playing anyway...if you had a better alternative, he'd already be playing. And then the guy who cant hit would be your DH, which is what ends up happening too often when you just pick from your unused players to bat in the DH spot every day. Cruz costs them very little flexibility. He takes the place of an extra futility infielder.
  10. Concur. And not only is it a position, having a better one than the team you're playing gives you an advantage, just like having the better starting pitcher, or better right fielder. The advantage is limited to the offensive side, but nonetheless, it's an advantage.
  11. Not that it matters, but the hot dogs served at Target Field are Schweigert hot dogs. "Big Dogs," "Dome Dogs," "Foot longs" etc, are obviously different.
  12. $1/hot dog?? A quick check of Schweigert hot dogs (at the Nicollet Mall Target) lists a package of 10 for $3.99. $.40/hot dog. https://www.google.com/shopping/product/1?hl=en&gl=us&output=search&lsf=seller:10046,store:511640365091534753,s:m&q=schweigert+hot+dogs&oq=schweigert+hot+dogs&prds=oid:13223681969682384282,pid:13223681969682384282&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjr28un7IHhAhWsxFkKHXeaD1IQ8gIIRg Presumably buying wholesale in bulk would cost even less. I don't think you'll find any regular hot dogs that weigh in a 1/4 pound, either, for that matter.
  13. The difference is, while 10 PAs are certainly not predictive, nobody would argue those 10 PAs (whether the dude hit 1.000 or .000) weren't accurately measured. Those 10 PAs did happen, and we know, for certain, what the results were. We can use those 10 accurately measured PAs, in conjunction with another 10 and another 10, and so on, to accurately measure what happened, and perhaps form an educated opinion about what is likely to happen in the future. Defensive metrics aren't sold that way. Everyone admits small sample sizes do not necessarily represent what actually happened. But those same people then turn around and claim "more inaccurate data" will solve the accuracy issue. I don't think it does. I think adding 10 accurately measured PAs to another 990 of the same gives you an accurate picture of what happened. But adding 10 inaccurately measured defensive plays to 990 other inaccurately measured defensive plays doesn't.
  14. unreliable small sample size, added to unreliable small sample size, is suddenly considered reliable, just because you now have more of the unreliable data. Doesn't compute, IMO.
×
×
  • Create New...