Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

USAFChief

Twins Daily Contributor
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    36,729

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    580

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by USAFChief

  1. USAFChief
    Let's hope. I don't think that's a guarantee. Day-twah looks pretty good to me, and Cleveland could win in the mid 80s.
  2. USAFChief
    Better at hitting. Are you just posting to see yourself in print? Or do you actually not understand baseball?
  3. USAFChief
    Don't forget sending out Polanco for the only add to the rotation.
  4. USAFChief
    Someone please put a leash on Baldelli so he doesn't take his better hitters out for a platoon PH opportunity in the middle innings. It's stupid, and counterproductive.
  5. USAFChief
    Sure glad Margot's in for Wallner. not. edit: posted prior to GDP
  6. USAFChief
    Wut??
  7. USAFChief
    Let's hope it gets worse and Farmer ends up facing a RHer later, too.
  8. USAFChief
    I don't PH Farmer here. edit: Terrific AB, sir.
  9. USAFChief
    I guarantee they'll do something.
  10. USAFChief
    And it came in the first inning of game 1. From somone on the IL
  11. USAFChief
    To be fair, they're down several of their preferred relievers. But I have no faith in Alcala. Regardless.
  12. USAFChief
    Alcala still isn't very good.
  13. USAFChief
    Offense remains offensive.
  14. USAFChief
    Twins have 2 chances at that this week...
  15. USAFChief
    We had Manny Margot at DH in the first game of the season, yet people think there wasn't room for Jorge Polanco.
  16. USAFChief
    I agree. But the post I responded to claimed the Twins didn't target Desclafani.
  17. USAFChief
    No matter how many times people try to pass this off, it's still not true.
  18. USAFChief
    In light of the "Desclafani isnt like these other trades" thread, I thought folk might want to review the reactions at the time of transaction.
  19. USAFChief
    A) you seem under the impression that because you don't think something is an option, nobody thinks it's an option B) you seem under the impression because you don't think it's an option, nobody thinks it's an option BTW, what's your DH solution? Margot in CF and Buxton at DH? Give that some thought, see if you can find the flaw, and get back to us.
  20. USAFChief
    LOL. Following this logic, we should trade Ryan, Lopez, Ober, Lewis, Julien, and Buxton, too. That'd really set up the future.
  21. USAFChief
    Maybe read my post again. You seem to agree with it.
  22. USAFChief
    Newsflash: they didn't trade for Burnes. Or anyone else. Desclafani was it. Written in ink. Done deal. Counted on.
  23. USAFChief
    He was written in ink as one of the five starters the minute the Mariners gleefully agreed to the trade. Also, "the lack of any other starter moves makes it seem like a bigger deal than it is"... Wow, what a bad take. Among other things, it completely invalidates the rest of your post.
  24. USAFChief
    A) we had Manny Margot at DH in a game already, yet Polanco was totally redundant?? (B) 100 percent? Stop it.
  25. USAFChief
    I agree...Polo wasn't any kind of realistic 3b option. But he'd look a whole lot better at DH than Manny Mar-gone. There was room on this roster for Polanco. You wouldn't need Santana, for one thing. No reason he couldn't play 1B. And if he needed trading, there was a better return out there than DeSclafani, a 30+ yr old reliever with zero history, and an A ball outfielder.
×
×
  • Create New...