Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    46,376

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    This team got older, with no ceiling to be good in a year or two. No chances at all are being taken on high upside players that weren't already on the 25 man roster. Indeed, they somehow managed to decrease the number of guys from the end of last year that were young with upside. On a 103 loss team...
  2. Mike Sixel
    At the rate they are fixing problems, the Twins should be great in 15 years, assuming everyone they bring on is still good then.... On a more serious note, people keep typing the following: "it's not a big deal, they can just cut him in a few weeks" "no big deal, they'll make adjustments in a few weeks" "they won't carry 13 pitchers for long" How do you know any of this? All we can go on is their actual actions. Their actual actions were all about bringing in veterans, and keeping DanSan and 13 pitchers on the roster. There is no evidence, at all, that decisions were driven by best performances, since none of the guys that were here before they came, that were not on the 40 man, made the roster. Only guys they acquired were added from off the 40 man. So, I guess what I'm saying is, we don't know at all what they are going to do, but we sure as heck know what they did. And what they did, so far, isn't pretty.
  3. Mike Sixel
    the "young" arms are 25-27 years old. They are literally losing velocity today.
  4. Mike Sixel
    I would guess Kepler is the backup 1B, yes. 13 pitchers, with off days. Must be some kind of stat head nerd geek thing no else has thought of....
  5. Mike Sixel
    Fair, i would not deal him. I think he's still a possible long term 4+ WAR player.
  6. Mike Sixel
    Next year, Chief, next year.
  7. Mike Sixel
    You realize there are entire treatises on the interwebs about this, right? You can believe the math, or not, up to you.
  8. Mike Sixel
    And yet, that same manager is in charge of his usage this year.....I hope he's learned.
  9. Mike Sixel
    next year, next year, next year.......been reading that here for three years now. Remember when people debated if the Cubs or Astros were ahead of the Twins, just last year? Good times.
  10. Mike Sixel
    If we think he's not great, why would a GM give up 3-4 prospects, including a pitcher in the top 10 - 20 prospects in teh game?
  11. Mike Sixel
    Can't. Tell. If. Serious. If so, why? Based on what, in the last two years?
  12. Mike Sixel
    I have a bit of hope for Tonkin, if he's used in 1 inning bursts....call me naive and overly hopeful, but I do.
  13. Mike Sixel
    According to fangraphs, the Twins have a number 3, and a bunch of number 4/5/6 types. Also, no one is suggesting they need to have five number 1 starters. Also, you can sign a FA to a long term deal, so that when they are good, that player is still here. If they aren't good in the next 3-4 years, they will have wasted Buxton and Sano.
  14. Mike Sixel
    we all hope that.
  15. Mike Sixel
    A team can work on the bullpen and the rotation and hitters all at the same time. This thread is about the bullpen
  16. Mike Sixel
    Sure, whatever, but giving them a pass on this seems a bit overly forgiving to me....I'd like to see this team "wing it" by betting on an unproven young guy as a RP, just one time, out of the gate.
  17. Mike Sixel
    Agreed, as long as Molitor is here, I don't know how anyone could feel good about the bullpen.
  18. Mike Sixel
    I wouldn't change a number from what Seth wrote. I also predict adequate defense.
  19. Mike Sixel
    Brutal. Nothing about this makes me feel good about the new FO.
  20. Mike Sixel
    Well, the stats are ambivalent on if he's the 3rd or 5th worst player in all of MLB the last two years.....you just can't trust them with that kind of variance.
  21. Mike Sixel
    28 home runs, about a 337 OBP. Not traded, because having a 2B at the end of his contract is somehow more important to a bad team than taking a chance on prospects. Heck, I predict he's signed to an extension, and they never trade him, just like Perkins.
  22. Mike Sixel
    Let's see what changes....Not holding my breath on Molitor changing, but we'll see. As for the players on the roster, I don't know if I could be more underwhelmed on the "changes" they've made.
  23. Mike Sixel
    funny, if I was on your meds, you could reverse those! magic those meds are!
  24. Mike Sixel
    It's not like the front, middle, or back end of the Twins' rotation is anything special. The Dodgers are projected to be the best staff in the game, even with Urias held back....it makes good sense to hold him back, use him less early, and have him ready for the playoffs. That all makes sense for the MLB roster this year, and the future. I guess we just disagree that having 1 number 3 and 4-8 number 5 starters, is the same as having the Dodgers rotation.
  25. Mike Sixel
    You don't see any difference in finding room on the Dodgers' rotation, the best in the baseball, than on the Twins' rotation?
×
×
  • Create New...