Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,973
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    330

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. This would not be my favorite decision.
  2. If I'm an expansion team, I'm taking veterans I can trade for prospects..... And really young players I can keep around. If I'm the Twins, I think I'd base my protection around that.
  3. I'm not criticizing anyone. I'm pointing out that if you have a budget, and get one time money, it's bad strategy to commit past one year. How is that debatable?
  4. I was aiming for five, maybe ten, percent over two weeks.... lucky for me this time. It's not always that way....
  5. When did they sign CC to the second deal? Wasn't that last year ?
  6. Vazquez for a defense first catcher for ten million. They didn't shed Kepler either. Covering is fine, if you don't plan to sign anyone else, and that doesn't account for next year's increases. My preference is irrelevant to what a team with budget constraints should do.
  7. One more thought... If the BAM money was one time.... They should not have signed long term deals, but only one year deals last year.. Locking in long term deals with one time money is bad business.
  8. Nice 16% profit in less than a week on that swing trade.....
  9. If they were emulating the Ray's, Kepler would be traded. They aren't really emulating them. They need to pick a lane.
  10. Also, Baltimore was terrible for years, and refused to invest in the team last year .... I'd guess their payroll is lower than the Twins....
  11. All y'all have staked out your positions for years on this topic. You have more stamina than me!
  12. I'm trying to be a better person, so I'll feel bad for him for a minute or two. He's one of the final straws for me ever rooting for individual athletes......
  13. Cool. Was just going to check....
  14. Likely it does nothing good. You can be competitive without spending in the top half, but you aren't winning it all.
  15. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2024-prospect-week-chat/ ram 1:15 Has there ever been a disparity between your list and the ZIPs list that has caused you to go back and reevaluate a prospect? Eric A Longenhagen 1:17 Yes, Danny sends me zips a few days ahead so i can double check some guys. This year it was Danny de Andrade, who I felt comfortable moving on from quickly from a top 100 standpoint, still a fair prospect who'll be on their team list
  16. For fun? I'm going with Montgomery for 1-2 years......
  17. At least he's being honest.
  18. Big fan of this combination. I expect Jeffers to be about ten percent worse, and Vazquez to be much better.... So a little better overall than last year. I hope Jeffers starts about ten or twenty more games than last year....
  19. Never too old! I bought more Nvidia after this mornings plunge.
  20. It's literally an article about payroll....what id you expect?
  21. that said, I 100% think this is why payroll is what it is this year. I also think they believe (rightly?) in the SP in AA and AAA and don't think they need to sign a FA SP to a 2+ year deal.
  22. I'm guessing Hunter and Cousins are gone. This is going to be ugly for a couple years.
  23. Fangraohs writers listed no one in the Twins.... Those two were from scouts. I was kind of bummed about that, given how many made that list.
×
×
  • Create New...