Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,924
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Imagine how bad your team would be if they all hit like Vazquez. Would it even win sixty games?
  2. No, but I'm not convinced about most any prospect, and even many MLB players. I guess we disagree on taking chances on upside, rather than settling for bad veterans.
  3. The could have Prielipp relieve for a couple months this year, and still be a starter to the start the year in the minors next year. I'd only do that if they are in the running......but it is not totally unusual to do. Lots of teams promote TOP prospects with less at bats than 600 in the minors. If he's healthy and the guy they all say he is, he should be up some time next year, well before September.
  4. Which is basically what I said in my second sentence. It's not just about him. On the other hand, they h have plenty of chaffe. Also, I've never understood why people want to watch bad veterans with no upside, rather than take a chance on rookies.
  5. He's way too old to worry about years of control. Now, they might not want to bump others.... But I can't imagine holding him back to worry about controlling him to age 33....
  6. Partly due to them splitting time, he doesn't even have 100 at bats as a catcher and that's a counting stat. But yes, he's not hitting great as a catcher this year. Still, more than twice as good as Vazquez.... Last year he was the 8th best hitting catcher. Sixth best in 2023. So anyone trading for him would be assuming he regresses to his career norms.
  7. He's the worst hitter in baseball. 301st of 303 with 100 at bats. No defense makes up for that.
  8. Either Sabato or Keaschell should be the first baseman at this point.... Once the latter is healthy.
  9. 303 hitters have at least 100 at bats. 2 are worse than Vazquez. No amount of defense makes up for that. He's not just worse, he's a lot worse.
  10. He's been bad, but he's still hitting just before average overall. Larnach is barely out hitting him. But I'd understand dealing wallner instead. But if Larnach is better, I deal him. I'm expecting Emma, Keaschell, and Jenkins all available next year in the OF at some point. But I'm not going to say your wrong.
  11. That's fair. I'm willing to bet on the more years of control for Wallner.
  12. I'd sign Bader to a two year deal. And trade Larnach in the off-season.
  13. 47 catchers have at least 100 at bats. Vazquez is the worst hitter of them all. And it's isn't close.
  14. 303 hitters have at least as many at bats as Vazquez. He's 301st in hitting! Just DFA him and try anyone else at this point.
  15. Does everyone else go to the bathroom or clean or something when Lewis and CC are up at this point?
  16. I guarantee if someone offers him one hundred million, he's leaving. Fifty, probably thirty, is enough. Maybe twenty.
  17. Martin and Keaschell come up for basically free. Martin can replace Bader. Paddock by a free player. That leaves catcher really to be signed. I guess first, but I'd put Keaschell there as soon as he's healthy this year I see no real additions this off session until the team is sold. Or they give up selling it. As I've said, morning changes until Lewis and CC hit or are gone.
×
×
  • Create New...