Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,924
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Like in Princess Bride....sure, hopefully there is not poison.
  2. I have my doubts about Pinto being on this roster next year. I don't believe Hu will start in the rotation next year, but I could see him up in the fall or so (depending on everyone's health, of course). I can't see them completely rebuilding the RP from inside. I would guess you'll see 1-2 FA types there.
  3. Except this was the other move.......
  4. That's why I'd describe my feelings as more "well, that's not what I was hoping for", than "that makes me mad"......
  5. I agree, if one works out, that's a good ratio (as long as they cut the other before waiting too long).
  6. Isn't that the entire point of the article? Outliers that defy the standard are more likely to have meaning (or value, or whatever) than "standard" types that appear to succeed. By math, there won't be much sample to work from.
  7. To the person that says Stauffer has a track record of success......he's never been above replacement level as a RP. As a starter, he was "meh" and that was in 2011. I'm not sure why anyone thinks Stauffer has a good track record.
  8. How about Stauffer for Vargas/Pinto, Brock?
  9. So, all those predictions Vargas went down for Pinto were not quite accurate. Yay! Go Twins!
  10. My perception also.....
  11. Other than CF (which may be fixedish).....the team has less black holes than the last two years. IMO, this shows the value of even average players. Not completely giving away multiple positions is huge. This is, imo, especially true about the pitching on this team. Ryan deserves credit for the that.
  12. If I wasn't married, I'd marry that article I love it so much.
  13. You read that 100% wrong. Plouffe is a top 10 player at his position.......it is rare to get more MLB talent in return, it usually comes in the form of prospects. My post was pretty clear, I thought, that it would be hard to get more talent, that is younger, that is MLB ready than you give up.
  14. Not sure why 1B and 3B are grouped, but it doesn't hurt anyone, because there aren't many guys....... Big believer in Sano, at 1B or DH or OF, mostly believe he can be a good 3B (counting hitting, since as posted above, it would make him even more valuable). Sort of a believer in Kepler, but I need a full year of productivity to really believe he has taken the step of translating all that talent to productivity. No idea how I feel about any of the others that aren't already 28ish.......just not enough data* *well, I am relatively sure a few won't make it, but not naming names.....
  15. I would also not call them boneheaded, agreed on that. Anymore than I would call those that disagree ridiculous, or stats' geeks.* It is certainly possible that all these decisions are working out because they are good decisions, it is more likely (even if I agreed with them all) that luck plays a role. Luck, or randomness, plays a role in all of life. That's why process is so important to business success, it tries to reduce the influence of luck.** *awful sentence **actually, when you are bad, you should rely more on luck, but most businesses and teams can't/won't do that......
  16. Nice writeup. Though I believe Harper is the answer to your question........
  17. Sure, if you can get younger and better, sure.....seems doubtful to me. And by younger and better, I mean MLB player......where they don't have a good/soon prospect. So, Catcher, and 1B (maybe) and corner OF. Oh, and maybe 3B if you lose Plouffe.
  18. Not shutting the door is different than people saying they should trade them. That's pretty clear, I think.
  19. You can choose to drive drunk, and not get in an accident, doesn't make the decision less boneheaded. Doesn't mean that luck doesn't play a role.* *I am not saying if the decisions the Twins are making are good or bad.....just that judging them on an outcome or 10 is not valid at all.
  20. Saying we have doubts, is very different than what doc said. And no, this isn't about lack of attention span......I would suggest not ascribing intent/belief/cause to other people.
  21. It raises an interesting question......if your best pitching coach is in the majors.....are you really helping your minor leaguers all that much?
  22. I could have sworn I read something by him......d'oh.
  23. Seth, is that speculation, or do you know something?
  24. He won't stay in their minors for that long, he'd leave. Every year not in the majors is lots of money down the drain. If he isn't up here until 30, would he ever even make $1MM in a year?
  25. Not sure what this means? Should Meyer be up, even if he walks guys? Should they continue to keep him in AAA, not making MLB money, when he could maybe be up here as a RP? Should they make him a reliever soon? I am not sure what you are saying, other than agreeing, right now, he doesn't have control. He may or may not have control. Randy appears to be anomaly among tall pitchers, not the rule.....
×
×
  • Create New...