Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,924
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. And people think Seth and I don't agree......I agree with this 100%: "The inherent problem with the Twins’ spending isn’t the lack of it. It’s the systemic problem that seems to pervade the organization: complacency. The Twins have a profound lack of ambition in virtually everything they do." and especially this: "don’t get me wrong, signing Hughes or Santana or, hell, even Nolasco isn’t enough to hamstring even a team that pretends they can’t spend money, like the Twins. However, Minnesota stacked these signings on top of one another, reducing their flexibility this year to the point where there isn’t room for more than one of higher-upside" I almost feel like this isn't coming from Seth, but then, he's no more an all in apologist, than I am an all in hater* *we have both been called these things.....
  2. Title inflation......nothing more to see there.
  3. Entrepreneurs generally are not good at running a business, and Ops people usually are not good at building new stuff. Maybe this is the same? I had not thought about it that way.
  4. He's 30.....let's hope he's not 31/2 before he debuts. That would be unfortunate.
  5. I am not a huge fan of TR the closer.......he seems to build well, but in his last iteration, he, imo, did not close the deal by signing FAs or trading minor leaguers for veterans that could close holes. IF baseball is cyclical, and they were fated to stink after their run, that is 100% an argument FOR trading prospects at that point....since those prospects won't be part of a winner anyway....... Having Becker and Tyner as your DH, on a championship potential team, was not, imo, acceptable. So, I like Terry to build the team, I am not sure I like him to take it to the next level or not. We'll see.
  6. I too would appoint someone "just left of center" over someone super liberal. The goal is to get the person confirmed. A secondary goal is to get the Republican Senate to harm their brand by not holding hearings. But, the main goal should be getting a 9th Justice on the court. 2 sessions with only 8 members is not good for the country.
  7. I'd vote lower end of medium, or higher end of small, because what matters is the number of cable subscribers.........that get FSN or whatever. Everything else in market size is probably not super relevant, imo. Heck, maybe they are small.....I don't have the data.
  8. No, you called me a liar. You said you didn't believe what I typed. Let's be clear here. And, I was asking, will the Republicans rubber stamp whomever she chooses, since she won?
  9. Based on what, do you think I am lying? You just called me a liar, right? and, what does the second line mean? Like, if there is a liberal appointed, the SC will somehow be ruined?
  10. I don't begrudge them making money. I want them to make money. I want the team to be successful on and off the field. But, when they are competitive, I want them to fill the holes with difference makers, who will likely cost money/prospects.
  11. Don't you understand, this will ruin 'merica, and the terrorists will win if we can't detain people without due process, torture them, and do it on foreign soil..... Hey, that's sarcasm, btw.....
  12. If Obama is a lame duck, what is every single house member right now? should they all stop voting on everything? What about the Senators up for re-election, should they stop right now?* *putting aside that that might be good if they all just quit.....that's not the point at all. If by a miracle, the House passed a budget, should Obama just look at the paper, and do nothing?
  13. I think I'm free to use principle here all day.....I'd say the same things to the Democratic Senators if needed. Is anyone under the delusion, that if Hilary wins the election, and Reps control the Senate, they'll say "the people have spoken, we'll approve Hillary's nominee"?
  14. What are you talking about? I don't give a crap what the parties would or would not do (even though we know that democrats have approved justices in the last year of a presidency). Congress should do their job, not leave the Court w/o 9 justices for 2 years.
  15. if you aren't willing to have "dead money" basically, you have to practically admit you will never sign a free agent. Also, that you will never sign your own players to long term deals to keep them past their FA time frame. No team does that and wins. Teams build the core thru draft, trade, development, and fill the holes with free agents. *those are some terrible sentences, I hope my points are clear.
  16. When Tyner is your DH, a hitter. When you are flush with number 3-5 starters, a number 1/2 type. When you have a lot of 1B/DH types, not another DH...... FA should, imo, be about filling a hole or three......with big time, elite, players, occasionally.
  17. Did that make it right? do you really think that in the 2 elections where people elected Obama, that they didn't think maybe he'd have to replace another justice? What is RIGHT for the country? He's not a lame duck, he's the elected PoTUS. He has almost a full year left. If only Congress would pass a budget, and do their jobs.........but they are too busy trying to make Obama look bad, at the expense of the country.
  18. Evidence that protection exists?
  19. I'm not sure what that has to do with the point I was making........has TR ever brought in a big time FA or traded top prospects for an elite player to close the gap? Tyner DH'd one of the years they were in contention, IIRC. McPhail brought in FAs to close the holes. But, changing the topic was great for not talking about the topic......will this FO close the holes, unlike they did in the last run, or not? That, to me, will answer the question about the system, because that is what was broken in the last run.
  20. I'd think that only writing this article with hindsight would get ripped to shreds.....
  21. I don't see a lot of disrespect on this thread......
  22. The Souhan article is based on number 3 hitter being your best hitter.......math shows that there is the TINIEST upside to that actually being your number 4 hitter. I don't agree that the series of RH batters is a problem, in terms of how to use THIS group of players. That is the group to work with, artificially moving Mauer around to get a LH bat in there for the small number of times it will matter seems like a bad idea to me. What I liked about the article, though, is that it was a real baseball article w/o a bunch of hyperbole.....
×
×
  • Create New...